euwe wrote:
Own a dictionary, dick? On Jul 18, 12:29 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:You are the one with the word games. I asked a simple question. Define your terms. That is supposedly the first and most important of a discussion. You are doing everything you can to evade that by throwing up any and all other comments you can. What I might think of the guy in the article has nothing to do with this until you define what YOU mean by racism. Anything else is just dust to cover up. euwe wrote:As I said, racists like to play word games like the guy in the article - the neo nazi, a group that dick doesn't think has anything to do with racism.On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you. Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or forget about it.euwe wrote:Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud enough for me.On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.euwe wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/And that means what with this discussion? -------- was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you think that was a Republican, or a liberal?On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.euwe wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would make you a racist by definition.euwe wrote:but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their hate for minorities.On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racismOn Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:Anointed One,You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think it sucks major.THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:"Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have noidea what you are talking about."I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love to.On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something about it?On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist, niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.euwe wrote:I don't care what race people are. ------- does racism bother you?On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex, color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then after the election forget all the above until the next election. At least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.euwe wrote:are you anti-racist, dick?On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just that this November.Sarcastic American! wrote:Thursday, July 15, 2010How 2 b a racist without being oneI was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia. We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this. So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster. Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they express what in is in the deepest recessions of your mind. Plus your pop lost his arm during WW2 fighting those Gerry s. You don t want to be associated with that crowd. So what s a true American to do? Easy! Be a passive/aggressive bigot and get away with it! Just fallow my easy plan. Being passive/aggressive is easy to do if you are an Anglo-Saxon. One of the many traits you have in your DNA is Sarcasm. Look how it works for Glenn Beck! He gets paid the big bucks having a spasm of mocking sarcasm. How about being stoic? You know: Clint Eastwood! Ever see his early movies? Like all wasp, he internalizes his emotions and represses it. That s a real man! Just think Dick Cheney? That man is dying of heart... read more »
No comments:
Post a Comment