moderated. I have checked and there are indeed large portions of your
former posts missing... our local moderators did NOT do that. If you
check though you will find that each section of your constitution that
was posted is still there at least ONCE. Gee, I warned you against
spam... Talk to your buddies at Google...ONLY they can do that, and it
is an auto response accomplished within the servers to save space.
As to my "lowly" "job" here... I enjoy reading different points of
view and am not so stupid that I need things CONSTANTLY repeated to
me; neither are the other posters.
Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The
Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful.
(Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has monkeys
in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international peace
negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of trying
to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you that
none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from my
New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what I
have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that
'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what everyone
on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would tire
of
reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are
first-
time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New
Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the adjunct
block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There are
many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the lives
of average Americans better.
It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a fall-
from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group isn't
part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am sympathetic to
the computer storage problems associated with active posts. Several
months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in
sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to defend...
socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, because
those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding what I
was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would be
for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang
around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied
below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" tone
and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a
Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, if
Mark interferes again, with THE most important post in the history of
Political Forum.
On May 1, 6:50 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear J. Ashley: Since as little as one to four sentences are needed
> to address the crucial issues, there are NO paragraphs in my New
> Constitution! If there were, the entire document would require fifty
> plus pages, rather than just ten ledger-size pages to print. In many
> cases I have "highlighted" the answer to a specific comment by putting
> *** ... in front of the main point in the reply. The reason I show
> the entire BLOCK of text (but not a paragraph) is so that people can
> read larger sections and get a feel for how things are organized. The
> 160 words you counted probably addressed 10 or more separate issues.
> In some cases, my adding a single word modifier to an existing
> sentence allows going in an entire new direction. For example: In the
> 1st Amendment, I added the word "peaceable" to "freedom of *
> religion." That is a protection against any religion that advocates
> or condones violence as a means of fostering its objectives. — J. A.
> Armistead —
>
> On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > John,
>
> > I accomplished the same outcome with 43 words of clarity that you did
> > with your convoluted paragraph of more than 160 words.
>
> > On 04/24/2011 05:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > J. Ashley: How quickly YOU forget! The following is from my New
> > > Constitution:
>
> > > "Section 9& 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person,
> > > news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
> > > government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
> > > while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
> > > make scheduled depositions provided they don�t communicate with the
> > > representatives otherwise. A representative�s constituents shall be
> > > allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
> > > only while they are in their home states or districts.
> > > Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
> > > return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
> > > constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
> > > accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
> > > solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
> > > solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
> > > organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
> > > prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
> > > above, is a felony�defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
> > > prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed." � John
> > > A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > On Apr 22, 11:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >> John,
>
> > >> How quick you forget. Do you not remember when you challenged me once
> > >> before? I posted the following problem and solution:
>
> > >> (1) The lobbying of Members of Congress by any Person on behalf of
> > >> anyone other than themselves shall be prohibited.
>
> > >> (2) Any Person found guilty of lobbying under the Prohibitions of
> > >> this Article shall be imprisoned for not less than 10 Years and/or
> > >> deported;
>
> > >> On 04/21/2011 06:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > >>> J. Ashley: You never did define a single problem with our government
> > >>> or society, and solve that problem in less than four sentences. I did
> > >>> that for fourteen years! Convoluted or not, my New Constitution
> > >>> solves society's problems! � J. A. A. �
> > >>> On Apr 21, 12:06 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> John,
> > >>>> How does your reply have anything to do with what I posted? It's no
> > >>>> wonder YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted.
> > >>>> On 04/20/2011 08:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > >>>>> Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone
> > >>>>> stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes sense.
> > >>>>> But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! � J. A. A. �
> > >>>>> On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> John,
> > >>>>>> 1) Trump has no ideology!
> > >>>>>> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists.
> > >>>>>> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If Trump
> > >>>>>>> was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's
> > >>>>>>> ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
> > >>>>>>> socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
> > >>>>>>> the head. � J. A. A. �
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> *John,
> > >>>>>>>> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
> > >>>>>>>> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
> > >>>>>>>> attention!*
> > >>>>>>>>http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp......
> > >>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
> > >>>>>>>>> Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
> > >>>>>>>>> post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
> > >>>>>>>>> Can Donald Trump �Fix� the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
> > >>>>>>>>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
> > >>>>>>>>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. For one
> > >>>>>>>>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something�like our broke economy�
> > >>>>>>>>> you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall that a
> > >>>>>>>>> certain new ice skating rink in New York�s Central Park started
> > >>>>>>>>> leaking water and couldn�t be used. That work had been done by three
> > >>>>>>>>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
> > >>>>>>>>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
> > >>>>>>>>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
> > >>>>>>>>> before long.
> > >>>>>>>>> Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are
> > >>>>>>>>> effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really
> > >>>>>>>>> �free� free enterprise system, I think of The Donald. He has been
> > >>>>>>>>> able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor
> > >>>>>>>>> unions and government regulations that are found in NYC. That man
> > >>>>>>>>> THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the
> > >>>>>>>>> job done! Part of the secret is his charisma. But most of it is
> > >>>>>>>>> because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word. He makes sure that all
> > >>>>>>>>> those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities
> > >>>>>>>>> are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches. In
> > >>>>>>>>> short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all
> > >>>>>>>>> time. His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors
> > >>>>>>>>> of most states. Under him people do their jobs and do them well.
> > >>>>>>>>> Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of
> > >>>>>>>>> projects, because it�s an honor just to be associated with one of his
> > >>>>>>>>> projects!
> > >>>>>>>>> Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative. But he doesn�t
> > >>>>>>>>> owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals
> > >>>>>>>>> do even without realizing that they do. The USA has been hamstrung
> > >>>>>>>>> trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we
> > >>>>>>>>> �invade� other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields
> > >>>>>>>>> get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there� just for
> > >>>>>>>>> their oil. By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go
> > >>>>>>>>> away. The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the
> > >>>>>>>>> USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have
> > >>>>>>>>> enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of
> > >>>>>>>>> the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those �poor�
> > >>>>>>>>> people till they are back on their feet. All of that is being done
> > >>>>>>>>> like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose
> > >>>>>>>>> standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the
> > >>>>>>>>> size and the over-control of our government. If The Donald can get us
> > >>>>>>>>> trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for
> > >>>>>>>>> our sacrifices, I�ll vote for him!
> > >>>>>>>>> Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in
> > >>>>>>>>> �possible� budget cuts that might save this country. The bad news is
> > >>>>>>>>> that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never-
> > >>>>>>>>> should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being
> > >>>>>>>>> run by government. After the nearly 15 years that I�ve spent penning
> > >>>>>>>>> and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas
> > >>>>>>>>> how to fix our government, fast. The following 5 things aren�t
> > >>>>>>>>> written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:
> > >>>>>>>>> 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
> > >>>>>>>>> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
> > >>>>>>>>> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
> > >>>>>>>>> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
> > >>>>>>>>> Republicans,
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment