To quote you: "MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in sounding negative
to my efforts, as though in concert to defend... socialism and communism."
You are nothing if not an Ass! I have NEVER defended socialism or
communism in any reply to any post of yours relating to that
piece-of-excrement you call YOUR New Constitution.
On 05/02/2011 08:55 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The
> Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful.
> (Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has monkeys
> in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international peace
> negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of trying
> to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you that
> none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from my
> New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what I
> have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that
> 'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what everyone
> on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would tire of
> reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are first-
> time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New
> Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the adjunct
> block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There are
> many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the lives
> of average Americans better.
>
> It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a fall-
> from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group isn't
> part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am sympathetic to
> the computer storage problems associated with active posts. Several
> months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in
> sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to defend...
> socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, because
> those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding what I
> was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would be
> for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang
> around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied
> below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" tone
> and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a
> Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, if
> Mark interferes again, with THE most important post in the history of
> Political Forum.
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> [The following Email was received from The Annointed (sic) One,
> today.]
>
> Posting your thoughts and ideas is a wonderful thing. It is a JOY to
> read every single posting every single day.
>
> There has been a problem of late, though. The posting of three or four
> original sentences that is followed by several paragraphs that are
> simply cut and paste that can also be found numerous times throughout
> that same thread and other threads as well is not what we do here.
>
> Well,, thats SPAM !!! I have no problem reading the same material once
> or twice but on some threads it is becoming ridiculously
> repetitive..... when that action spreads to other threads and the
> supposed posting either originates or answers in that (or those)
> threads using the same cut and paste diatribe it is against our rules.
> WE DO NOT ACCEPT SPAM from outside sources or from
> members !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> So BASTA, GENUG, ENOUGH !!!! In the future said posts will be removed,
> the explanation is here.
>
> On May 1, 8:50 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Dear J. Ashley: Since as little as one to four sentences are needed
>> to address the crucial issues, there are NO paragraphs in my New
>> Constitution! If there were, the entire document would require fifty
>> plus pages, rather than just ten ledger-size pages to print. In many
>> cases I have "highlighted" the answer to a specific comment by putting
>> *** ... in front of the main point in the reply. The reason I show
>> the entire BLOCK of text (but not a paragraph) is so that people can
>> read larger sections and get a feel for how things are organized. The
>> 160 words you counted probably addressed 10 or more separate issues.
>> In some cases, my adding a single word modifier to an existing
>> sentence allows going in an entire new direction. For example: In the
>> 1st Amendment, I added the word "peaceable" to "freedom of *
>> religion." That is a protection against any religion that advocates
>> or condones violence as a means of fostering its objectives. — J. A.
>> Armistead —
>>
>> On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> John,
>>> I accomplished the same outcome with 43 words of clarity that you did
>>> with your convoluted paragraph of more than 160 words.
>>> On 04/24/2011 05:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>>> J. Ashley: How quickly YOU forget! The following is from my New
>>>> Constitution:
>>>> "Section 9& 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person,
>>>> news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
>>>> government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
>>>> while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
>>>> make scheduled depositions provided they don�t communicate with the
>>>> representatives otherwise. A representative�s constituents shall be
>>>> allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
>>>> only while they are in their home states or districts.
>>>> Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
>>>> return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
>>>> constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
>>>> accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
>>>> solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
>>>> solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
>>>> organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
>>>> prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
>>>> above, is a felony�defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
>>>> prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed." � John
>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot
>>>> On Apr 22, 11:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> John,
>>>>> How quick you forget. Do you not remember when you challenged me once
>>>>> before? I posted the following problem and solution:
>>>>> (1) The lobbying of Members of Congress by any Person on behalf of
>>>>> anyone other than themselves shall be prohibited.
>>>>> (2) Any Person found guilty of lobbying under the Prohibitions of
>>>>> this Article shall be imprisoned for not less than 10 Years and/or
>>>>> deported;
>>>>> On 04/21/2011 06:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>>>>> J. Ashley: You never did define a single problem with our government
>>>>>> or society, and solve that problem in less than four sentences. I did
>>>>>> that for fourteen years! Convoluted or not, my New Constitution
>>>>>> solves society's problems! � J. A. A. �
>>>>>> On Apr 21, 12:06 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> John,
>>>>>>> How does your reply have anything to do with what I posted? It's no
>>>>>>> wonder YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted.
>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>>>>>>> Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone
>>>>>>>> stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes sense.
>>>>>>>> But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! � J. A. A. �
>>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> John,
>>>>>>>>> 1) Trump has no ideology!
>>>>>>>>> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists.
>>>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If Trump
>>>>>>>>>> was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's
>>>>>>>>>> ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
>>>>>>>>>> socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
>>>>>>>>>> the head. � J. A. A. �
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> *John,
>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
>>>>>>>>>>> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
>>>>>>>>>>> attention!*
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp......
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
>>>>>>>>>>>> post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can Donald Trump �Fix� the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
>>>>>>>>>>>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
>>>>>>>>>>>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. For one
>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something�like our broke economy�
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall that a
>>>>>>>>>>>> certain new ice skating rink in New York�s Central Park started
>>>>>>>>>>>> leaking water and couldn�t be used. That work had been done by three
>>>>>>>>>>>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
>>>>>>>>>>>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
>>>>>>>>>>>> before long.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are
>>>>>>>>>>>> effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really
>>>>>>>>>>>> �free� free enterprise system, I think of The Donald. He has been
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor
>>>>>>>>>>>> unions and government regulations that are found in NYC. That man
>>>>>>>>>>>> THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the
>>>>>>>>>>>> job done! Part of the secret is his charisma. But most of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word. He makes sure that all
>>>>>>>>>>>> those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities
>>>>>>>>>>>> are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches. In
>>>>>>>>>>>> short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all
>>>>>>>>>>>> time. His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors
>>>>>>>>>>>> of most states. Under him people do their jobs and do them well.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of
>>>>>>>>>>>> projects, because it�s an honor just to be associated with one of his
>>>>>>>>>>>> projects!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative. But he doesn�t
>>>>>>>>>>>> owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals
>>>>>>>>>>>> do even without realizing that they do. The USA has been hamstrung
>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we
>>>>>>>>>>>> �invade� other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields
>>>>>>>>>>>> get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there� just for
>>>>>>>>>>>> their oil. By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go
>>>>>>>>>>>> away. The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the
>>>>>>>>>>>> USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have
>>>>>>>>>>>> enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those �poor�
>>>>>>>>>>>> people till they are back on their feet. All of that is being done
>>>>>>>>>>>> like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose
>>>>>>>>>>>> standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> size and the over-control of our government. If The Donald can get us
>>>>>>>>>>>> trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for
>>>>>>>>>>>> our sacrifices, I�ll vote for him!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in
>>>>>>>>>>>> �possible� budget cuts that might save this country. The bad news is
>>>>>>>>>>>> that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never-
>>>>>>>>>>>> should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being
>>>>>>>>>>>> run by government. After the nearly 15 years that I�ve spent penning
>>>>>>>>>>>> and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas
>>>>>>>>>>>> how to fix our government, fast. The following 5 things aren�t
>>>>>>>>>>>> written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
>>>>>>>>>>>> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
>>>>>>>>>>>> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans,
>> ...
>>
>> read more »
--
Freedom is always illegal.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment