Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark, if you feel that way, then you too are a socialist-communist—or
else you can't read and comprehend. Attack me in any way, and you
attack fair, free-enterprise capitalism and having maximum civil
liberties for the vast majority of Americans. Until you can recognize
those facts, I have you correctly pegged-through-the-heart with a
sharply pointed wooden stake. — NE —
>
On Mar 22, 11:55 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kinda like you and your supposed "constitution" that goes beyond the scope
> of a REAL Constitution ie.
>
> *The fundamental law, written or unwritten, that establishes the character
> of a government by defining the basic principles to which a society must
> conform; by describing the organization of the government and regulation,
> distribution, and limitations on the functions of different government
> departments; and by prescribing the extent and manner of the exercise of its
> sovereign powers.*
> *
> *
> ***Go, get a new life. **what you are doing is a waste of your time and most
> importantly....MINE. I have to read all the drivel (your "constitution"
> posts) as well as all the meaningful stuff every day on this forum. What you
> have written and displayed so far IS A JOKE.*
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > MJ:  All of those quotations of others that you cut and paste aren't
> > increasing your status in the groups one bit.  And haven't you heard?
> > It isn't polite to YELL (use larger type size).  You are a pest on my
> > post, simply because you know I have a lot of things going for me.  In
> > the perhaps years you have "tooted" your one page constitution, you
> > haven't gotten many readers, have you.  Please make a "quote" of your
> > own worthy of being in Bartlett's.  If you can't do that, then you
> > should seriously consider getting another (pretend) hobby.  — J. A. A.
> > —
>
> > On Mar 21, 10:11 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > And yet AGAIN ... you offer a response.
> > > SADLY, you offer no support to your claims.
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual
> > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
> > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient
> > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
> > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its
> > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and
> > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 10:06 AM
> > 3/21/2011, you wrote:Party crashers, like MJ, are undeserving of being
> > replied to.  — J. A.
> > > A. —
>
> > > On Mar 19, 9:50 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > It is my understanding that I am a member (in good standing?) of this
> > Group (PoliticalFo...@GoogleGroups.com).
> > > > I never claimed to be a moderator.
> > > > I did not request a 'discussion'.
> > > > I did, however, ask for YOU to support YOUR assertion and explain:
> > > >   What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine 'run counter' when you
> > claim, "sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
> > and their families"
> > > > Apparently you cannot support your claim(s) which is why you resort to
> > spewing fallacy when anyone responds to your posts.
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a
> > right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the
> > right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are
> > evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of
> > self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature." -- Samuel
> > Adams, November 20, 1772At 05:42 PM 3/18/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ:  You are a
> > rude party crasher, not a moderator.  I am not
> > > > interested in having a discussion with anyone regarding the specifics
> > > > of my New Constitution.  As for science, I am the King of the Hill of
> > > > patriotic Americans!  — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > > > On Mar 17, 8:45 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > >In medical facilities all across the country, "medical protocol"
> > > > > >sometimes runs counter to the Constitutional rights of both patients
> > > > > >and their families.
>
> > > > > What 'constitutional rights' do you imagine to have 'run counter'?
> > > > > Please cite some examples.
>
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it
> > > > > cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on
> > > > > the government, not on private individuals -- that it does not
> > > > > prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the
> > > > > government -- that it is not a charter _for_ government power, but a
> > > > > charter of the citizen's protection _against_ the government. --
> > > > > Alyssa Rosenbaum
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *Fila Coffee*
> *www.filacoffee.com*

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.