Re: California: Los Angeles Court Defends Red Light Cameras

>In Massachusetts, we (they, dems) made law that says to challenge any
>traffic ticket (magistrate OR court (trial)), it will cost you $75.
>Win or lose, you still owe the 75.
>
>Jesus H. I know I am not a constitutional professor like someone
>else, but on face value from a software geek, this violates amendments
>1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 14, at first glance. I gotta PAY for being
>aquitted? WHAT??? Lets just start with 1, "redress of grievances")

Amendment I is a prohibition against Congress -- not the State legislature. :)

Most studies concluded that these cameras CAUSED more accidents than
they curtailed.

I want to know how one 'cross examines' a camera.

Regard$,
--MJ

"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of
evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.