On 03/23/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Mark: Should I be flattered that you remember what I say from one day to the next? If indeed you can read and comprehend, you wouldn't need to put those words in capitals. Unlike you and MJ, I don't depend on YELLING to make my points. If you find what I'm writing to be interesting enough to read every day, then you are either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened and thus opposed. The "tone" of my document is pro control of government by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use of tax dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the rights of others. I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I have. If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution. If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts. No socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA! — John A. Armistead — PatriotOn Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is that we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND. The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next what he says. On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J. A. A. And now HERE in THIS thread the same person: I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile continuing to "cover" only those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of getting first rate care.The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.There is ALSO this from the same person: Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive new developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to maintain continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type. Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform safe and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry regulated. Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents. <sigh> Sad.As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you refuse to present and merey proclaim.Regard$, --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John A. Armistead — PatriotOn Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas and I the converse. It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to seehow it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a foundation.Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their privateproperty without outside interference.Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention. Regard$, --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busywhen they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me say something like this: "Iapplaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country! — J. A. Armistead —On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:John,eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000transactionsare performed every minute throughout the world with no need for government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they are happy with the transaction 96% of the time.There is no need for government involvement in commerce.On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most procapitalismand pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan!�J. A. A. � On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be afreesovereign, I do not consent.As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference,96%successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise asitgets.On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free enterprise. So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent ontearingdown this country rather than saving it. He should be railroadedoutof the USA! � J. A. A. � On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again! He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw politicalparties.He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has "thesmartsand the temperament to be President." On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace get hot-under-the-collar if a"guest",like Sarah Palin, avoids answering questions that tie her handsonissues that are in flux. Those two Fox jerks suppose that sincetheyare high paid and elitist, that people must do exactly like theysayor face ridicule. Within one week after my New Constitution is ratified, the entire Fox News Network will likely be closed downfornot being in the best interest of the country. But not toworry! Theother News Networks will be shuttered as well. The "problem" isthatNEWS, and commentary on that news, cannot occur on the samenetwork.Of course that is only for news relating to elections or"politics".I put that word in quotes, because political parties will be outlawed! Socialism will become a non issue, because any"politician"proposing anything like socialism will be hanged for TREASON!Believeme, people, I can straighten out this country faster than anyyellow-livered politician. Newt Gingrich has the smarts and thetemperamentto be President. But he is too much in love with our FAILEDsystem ofgovernment to save the country from economic doom. The Donaldhas agood idea to make IRAQ pay for all we have done for thosepeople. Weshould do those things AND tell China they will get back ONLY the principle on their loans to the USA. �Walk tall and carry abigstick!� Only tough-love can save this country... NOT moreGod-damnedpolitics and wasted campaign money... as usual. After BarackObamahas been hanged and has rotted to the ground for TREASON, thiscountrywill be on the path to economic recovery! � John A. Armistead�Patriot On Mar 16, 3:38 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.comwrote:As usual, "no specifics are open for discussion." What an egothis guyhas. Mustn't let anyone ask any questions. His head mightexplode.On 03/16/2011 11:53 AM, NoEinstein wrote:Folks: The vast majority of the still apt portions of ouroriginalConstitution remains within my New Constitution. Issuesrelating tohaving government be deferential to the people, and placingreasonablelimits of the type and scope of the laws that may be passed, isthesubject of much that I have expanded on in my NewConstitution. I'veplaced great importance on seeing to it that the corruption in government�state, local and federal�which I have observedfirst hand,shall never again negatively impact any law-abiding citizen. There are dozens of well-defined, unconstitutional acts bygovernmentemployees or elected officials that will either get the personsfiredor sent to prison. Working for government, even for thePresident,.. read more »
--
Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.
Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.
Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
No comments:
Post a Comment