Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

<sigh>
I made no claim nor expressed any desire to be a 'co-author'. Yet MORE fallacy.
This is getting rather sad, really.

Regard$,
--MJ

It is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them. Using this kind of reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything about anything, without having to bother to deal with facts or logic. -- Thomas Sowell


At 10:54 PM 2/15/2011, you wrote:

Dear J. A.:  Thanks!  My New Constitution has the best interests of
everyone at heart.  MJ, as much as he wishes, won't be a co-author of
even a word of it.  — NE —
>
On Feb 15, 11:26 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> It appears to me that "NoEinstein" has squat.
>
> On 2/14/2011 9:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par
> > with
> > your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> > for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> > when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> > must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> > of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> > ratification process.  � John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> > On Feb 14, 1:29 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >> So you are going to ENDLESSLY spew fallacy?
> >> Why not simply posit your Constitution instead so it can be discussed and we might get somewhere?
> >> Regard$,
> >> --MJIt is amazing how many people think that they can
> >> answer an argument by attributing bad motives to
> >> those who disagree with them. Using this kind of
> >> reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything
> >> about anything, without having to bother to deal
> >> with facts or logic. -- Thomas SowellAt 01:20 PM 2/14/2011, you wrote:On Feb 14, 10:09 am, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >> Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >> your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> >> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >> when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> >> must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> >> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >> ratification process.  � John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>> Why you imagine spewing fallacy aids your cause is unknown.
> >>> I can certainly understand WHY you would prefer NOT to support (or attempt to) your efforts or claims.
> >>> Regard$,
> >>> --MJA state of skepticism and suspense may amuse a few inquisitive
> >>> minds.  But the practice of superstition is so congenial to the
> >>> multitude that, if they are forcibly awakened, they still regret
> >>> the loss of their pleasing vision.
> >>> -- Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire_At 11:36 PM 2/13/2011, you wrote:Dear MJ:  Your tact and your manners, in general, aren't on a par with
> >>> your library of worthy quotes from others.  Albert Einstein covered
> >>> for his Moron IQ by memorizing quotes, so he could say those things
> >>> when apt.  Your doing the same thing impresses few, I'm sure.  So, I
> >>> must decline to reply to you in the future.  You individual approval
> >>> of anything in my New Constitution certainly won't be part of the
> >>> ratification process.  � John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>> On Feb 12, 9:35 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net>  wrote:
> >>>> MJ, you seem to be on-the-fence whether you concur with what I'm
> >>>> doing.  I invite your more specific comments, because time does not
> >>>> allow me to be as wordy in future replies.  Your "$" salutation amuses
> >>>> I would need to see the TEXT of this Constitution in order to
> >>>> discuss it. I erroneously believed we were discussing the US
> >>>> Constitution ... and then you wanted to instead argue about something
> >>>> I STILL have not seen -- as though I instead had.
> >>>> Post the text already.
> >>>> I will provide the text of something that appears quite workable.
> >>>> Regard$,
> >>>> --MJThe fact that I have no remedy for all the sorrows of the world is no reason for my accepting yours. It simply supports the strong probability that yours is a fake. --  H.L. Mencken
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> For options&  help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Don't rely on an overpriced attorney. Learn how you can control judges
> and lawyers < http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.