to be on the Presidential ballot is successful.... who will run for
the Dems ??
On Feb 16, 6:46 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lets hope they run Bozo Lipstick Palin. The president will wipe the
> floor with her.
>
> On 2/16/11, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The Republicans could run Bozo and beat Obama.... they will turn out
> > in droves.
>
> > On Feb 16, 4:15 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> How 'pitiful' is the Republican presidential field?
> >> After crunching the numbers, polling guru Nate Silver finds the GOP's
> >> slate of potential 2012 candidates among the weakest in memory. How
> >> worried should Republicans be?
> >> posted on February 16, 2011, at 11:36 AM
>
> >> Though Mike Huckabee has the strongest favorability rating among
> >> potential Republican presidential contenders, the numbers are not
> >> encouraging. Photo: Corbis SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS
> >> Best Opinion: NY Times, American Prospect, Huff. Post...
>
> >> Republican insiders are fretting about the party's crop of likely 2012
> >> presidential candidates, and they "have some legitimate reason to
> >> worry," says The New York Times polling guru Nate Silver. According to
> >> public opinion polls, the field is currently "quite weak." Only two
> >> likely Republican contenders — Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney — have
> >> positive favorability ratings. Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich have
> >> "especially poor" ratings, in the negative double digits. Is the 2012
> >> GOP field, as The Atlantic's Andrew Sullivan puts it, irredeemably
> >> "pitiful?"
>
> >> The GOP field is weak: These numbers are "bad news for Republicans,"
> >> says Jim Lindgren in The Volokh Conspiracy. Some of the GOP contenders
> >> could make "better than average presidents," but "I see no one who as
> >> yet looks to be a better than average candidate." If this is the best
> >> the GOP can muster, "President Obama will be hard to beat."
> >> "The political weakness of the 2012 Republican field"
>
> >> This is no big deal: The "stunning unpopularity" of the field actually
> >> "doesn't strike me as something Republicans should worry about," says
> >> Jamelle Bouie in The American Prospect. At least not this early.
> >> "Favorability" just means "familiarity" at this stage, and many
> >> eventual winners were in mediocre shape early on. Two good examples:
> >> At roughly this in their campaign cycles, Bill Clinton had net
> >> favorability rating of just +3, while Ronald Reagan's was -1.
> >> "Early polling doesn't matter"
>
> >> The only numbers that matter are economic: Jobs and economic growth
> >> will be the factors that decide our next president, says Brendan Nyhan
> >> in The Huffington Post. Sure, the GOP field lacks a "widely praised
> >> figure who is held in esteem by both Democrats and Republicans." But
> >> "if the economy [remains] bad enough," as long as Republicans pick a
> >> nominee who isn't Palin or Gingrich, they'll win.
> >> "Are the Republican presidential candidates weak?"
>
> >> More:http://theweek.com/article/briefing_blog/203/2012-presidential-race
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment