> Even if the thinking at the time the map was put together was to use
> cross-hairs, is it really any different than the bulls-eyes used in
> Democratic ad's? Both symbols are there to convey the exact same
> point; a district perceived to be weak and to be focused on. It's
> being disingenuous to suggest anyone behind any of these maps was
> thinking "assassinate the competition". People who think that are
> either as looney as Loughner or believe scoring political points is
> more important than maintaining any sense of moral dignity.
So frank, moral dignity dictates that it's wrong that Giffords thought
there should be consequences for such things as using cross-hairs to
target her?
That was her take on it, and now you're calling her looney?
All I have to do is sit back and watch the Republitards make one
excuse after another and crash and burn all along the way.
Most Americans aren't buying any of these lame excuses.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment