Re: Rep. Charles Rangel Faces Sanctions After Ethics Convictions - ABC News

Barney Frank was censured for a single violation (granted, it was a
doozy). Shouldn't 11 warrant a reprimand?

On Nov 18, 8:41 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> He will likely escape much of anything (do not want additional
> precedents).  He will, however, be the Republican whipping boy for at
> least the next two years.  Gots to emphasize something as a difference.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> ... where corruption and public crimes are not carefully opposed,
> and severely punished, neither liberty nor security can possibly
> subsist. -- Cato's Letters (1721)
>
> At 08:32 AM 11/18/2010, you wrote:
>
>
>
> >Reprimand is doubtful,  Public statement "deploring his conduct" is
> >the likely "penalty"
>
> >On Nov 18, 7:41 am, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Charlie learns his fate today.  Bela Pelosi has done such a
> > wonderful job of "draining the swamp".
>
> > > Rangel will be reprimanded and then go on "business as usual".  Sad.
>
> > >http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep-charles-rangel-faces-sanctions-eth...
>
> >--
> >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.