Re: Paying taxes doesn’t allow Atheists, nor any group , to dictate to others.

John,

 

I agree.....Whole Heartedly.   Well said.

 

Keith

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:

On Sep 10, 12:18 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> Although it was difficult to get through that long winded disortation,
> (reminds me of someone who graduated from Clemson!)  and I agree that the
> Obama Administration has by executive order installed unconstitutional,
> communistic mandates upon "We, The People";   I am at a loss as to how you
> believe that our two party system is unconstitutional.
>
> Far from it.
>
> There is nothing in the Constitution,  (or maybe you can point out the
> Article and paragraph for us?)  that restricts the association of like
> minded politically thinking individuals from forming associations or groups
> to further their political cause.
>
> I also take exception to your notion that the "weak govern the strong".
> Examples please.
>

Keith:  The primary standard for strength and weakness is one's
economic success.  The super rich have dozens of employees to do their
every bidding.  If they get sick, they can afford the best care in the
world.  If they get sued, they can afford the very best lawyers.  The
rich are the leaders, not the followers, and those tend to be
powerful. Conversely, those who barely have enough money to survive
are weak.  When they get sick, they can't pay.  When they get in
trouble they have only couldn't-care-less lawyers to represent them.
The only "strength" that they have is the fact our original
Constitution (only) gives those very many weak people the same voting
power as the strong.  The weak are constantly trying to dominate the
strong—not by elevating themselves through fair capitalism—but by
banding together in as huge a group as possible (Democrats) so that
that unconstitutional group can mandate that the rich pay for their
every need, without any of them having to do a thing but to vote for
Obama, the anti-Christ, on election day.  Is it any wonder the polls
are so close?  The above is what I meant by the weak dominating the
powerful.  They are like thieves robbing the stage coaches of old in
order to have an easier life.  Who in this country is "riding shotgun"
to protect the rights of the powerful?  Lest any of you think I don't
care about the disadvantaged, I do.  I just see FAIR capitalism as the
quickest route for success for the most people, rather than having
people BEGGING government for free handouts.  Very importantly: Once
government stops being socialistic, there will be more money left in
most people's pockets so that those in true need will get necessary
charity without government involvement.  The rich must not be allowed
to be like that sheep with two wolves trying to decide what is for
dinner.  After the decision, all three should be alive and well!  —
John A. Armistead —

>
  With regard to bias within the law.....Yes.  It's true,
> and has been since the beginning of recorded history.  The United States is
> no exception, and I can cite numerous instances within our 235 year
> history,  beginning with the "Shea's Rebellion"  of bias contained within
> the law.   To some degree,  it is these "biases"  that you refer to, that
> shape and form our "culture" and our "morals".
>
> All unalienable rights are from God,  not government and they cannot be
> stripped by government,  unless one "volunteers"  to waive his God given
> unalienable right.
>

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:

>
>
>
> > Yes, Studio, but "the two major political parties" are 100%
> > UNCONSTITUTIONAL under our present Constitution!  The USA isn't a
> > democracy, but is supposed to be (but never has been) a Representative
> > Republic.  The Founding Fathers were totally committed to the
> > principle that the PEOPLE control government.  Nowhere in the
> > Constitution is it sanctioned to allow political parties to substitute
> > biased group power for the "close to a Democracy" power of the voters
> > on election day.  Yes, there were Whigs and Tories in the 18th
> > century.  But those were mechanisms for government control far
> > different from a Representative Republic!  Note: That treasonous
> > BASTARD in the White House, Barack H. Obama, still supposes that the
> > USA is "our great Democracy", while he acts as our communist-socialist
> > dictator.  As numbers of you have pointed out a year or two ago,
> > Democracies—if that's the only stipulated 'control' of government—will
> > allow the weak to control the strong.  And that isn't just if it is
> > like: two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for supper.  Having
> > controls in the Constitution that mandate justice and fairness will
> > allow the voters to decide controversial issues WITHIN the bounds of
> > justice and fairness.  No biased group gets to define justice and
> > fairness so as to allow them to exploit others for their own selfish
> > gain.  The best route to saving the USA, as well as our entire
> > socioeconomic system, is to strip all biased groups of power over the
> > course of government.  Once that happens, there won't be any more
> > pressure to have governments become all things for all people, which
> > as we should know by now ( but Obama doesn't), doesn't work!  — John
> > A. Armistead —
>
> > On Sep 6, 11:48 am, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 5, 5:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Studio:
> > > >  Since both of those are issues of
> > > > high controversy, the American People should be allowed to decide once
> > > > and for all in direct referenda.
>
> > > I'm in TOTAL agreement with that!
> > > However, Republitards will remind you we live in a Republic, not a
> > > Democracy.
> > > And neither of the 2 major parties actually want people to decide by
> > > referendum.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.

> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.