Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Fwd: [grendelreport] DOJ Gives ATF Orders To commit Civil Forfeiture Against Medical Marijuana Gun Owners
----------
DOJ Gives ATF Orders To commit Civil Forfeiture Against Medical
Marijuana Gun Owners
While the profit motive police model has been one the feds have slowly
been getting away from since the late 90′s due to the inherent abuse
and corruption it breeds and rights it violates,…The DOJ has not
decided the already regressive BATF shall become officially devolve
even more quickly and completely,…giving a big giant green light for
them to now seize guns in civil forfeiture cases wherever drug abuse
by the owner is merely suspected. No charges necessary, no due process.
While the latest directive does not come out and say it, this is an
obvious attempt at a ham-fisted solution to states’ rights medical
marijuana issue. While many states have said it is ok for citizens to
possess weed, the feds have been trying to dissuade the practice by
seeking to revoke concealed carry permits and other civil rights
related to gun possession by those who seek medical marjiuana status.
But this has turned out to be more effort than the feds have been
prepared for, and costly. In short, there are just too many damned
people to prosecute, most of whom fight and don’t just roll over,
for the courts to handle the work load.
So, their answer to that logistical problem is to just dispense with
due process, making everything much easier, cheaper and less time-consuming.
Since medical marijuana users are required to have a state license,
they are listed in a handy database. Holders of CCW cards as well, are
also databased, making the two lists easily cross-referenced. Hitler
would have been impressed. Soon, anyone who appears on both lists will
be getting their doors kicked in. But is that all? What if you are an
activist who fights for and promotes medical marijuana or ending the
War on Drugs? To law enforcement, is that likely to be interpreted
that you must also be a user of such substances? (Remember, SUSPICION
is all that is required.) Might gun owners who have fought to end the
Drug War end up getting raided. ATF’s history as a dangerous rogue
agency suggests that is a valid worry.
am-fisted solution to states’ rights medical marijuana issue. While
many states have said it is ok for citizens to possess weed, the feds
have been trying to dissuade the practice by seeking to revoke
concealed carry permits and other civil rights related to gun
possession by those who seek medical marjiuana status. But this has
turned out to be more effort than the feds have been prepared for, and
costly. In short, there are just too many damned people to prosecute,
most of whom fight and don’t just roll over, for the courts to handle the work load.
So, their answer to that logistical problem is to just dispense with
due process, making everything much easier, cheaper and less time-consuming.
Since medical marijuana users are required to have a state license,
they are listed in a handy database. Holders of CCW cards as well, are
also databased, making the two lists easily cross-referenced. Hitler
would have been impressed. Soon, anyone who appears on both lists will
be getting their doors kicked in. But is that all? What if you are an
activist who fights for and promotes medical marijuana or ending the
War on Drugs? To law enforcement, is that likely to be interpreted
that you must also be a user of such substances? (Remember, SUSPICION
is all that is required.) Might gun owners who have fought to end the
Drug War end up getting raided. ATF’s history as a dangerous rogue
agency suggests that is a valid worry.
http://www.realnewsreporter.com/?p=9725
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic
Recent Activity:
New Members 3
Visit Your Group
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=20194806/grpspId=1705323667/msgId=0/stime=1347996039/nc1=4836036/nc2=5028924/nc3=3848621>
__,_._,___
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment