When was the last time that the government of Russia or China condoned the storming of our embassy and the taking of hostages from our embassy?
When was the last time that Russia or China engaged in open hostilities (like the taking of a drone, the funding of weapons and the placement of weapons that killed American servicemen) like Iran has?
There is plenty of reason for concern PlainOl, but go ahead and continue to stick your head in the sand.
Just as important, despite Crazy Uncle Ron's allegations, I don't hear anyone clamoring for war with Iran. We collectively have a bad taste in our mouths after Afghanistan and Iraq. There is no need to be ignorant and ignore potential threats.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:16 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I---
Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
debates.
Iran's nukes are not America's business and no more of a threat than
Israel, Russia or China nukes.
Don't be so afraid.
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin...
On Jan 16, 8:32 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at
> first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem
> alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't
> care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
> Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
> debates.
>
> Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not attempting
> to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement?
>
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira...
>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the
> > reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business
> > of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors
> > and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything
> > else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is
> > the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence.
>
> > Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export
> > crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says
> > they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't.
>
> > The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using and
> > refining the nuclear process??
>
> > Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before
> > screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul.
>
> > If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not;
> > fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can
> > take place.
>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com
> >> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> >> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> >> nuclear power?
>
> >> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>
> ...> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> >>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> >>> preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> >>> security."
> >>> "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> >>> is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> >>> a nuclear weapon.
> >>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> >>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> >>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> >>> a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> >>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> >>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> >>> it.
>
> >>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> >>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> >>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> >>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a
> >>> fair,
> >>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> >>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> >>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which
> >>> turns
> >>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> >>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>> keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> >>> re-read
> >>> > > it.
>
> >>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >>> > >> misinformed
> >>> > >> ---
> >>> > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an
> >>> 'important'
> >>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash
> >>> allegedly
> >>> > >> showed
> >>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to
> >>> Jeremy
> >>> > >> > Bash?
>
> >>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>> stay
> >>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >>> > >> nevertheless
> >>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> >>> their
> >>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >>> > >> misinformation
> >>> > >> > as the truth.
>
> >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >>> > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >>> > >> > > ---
> >>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> >>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron
> >>> Paul
> >>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> >>> whomever
> >>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed
> >>> bias
> >>> > >> > > against Paul.
>
> >>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her
> >>> husband
> >>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> >>> Secretary
> >>> > >> > > of Defense.
>
> >>> > >> > > some don't forget
>
> >>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >>> > >> > > > **
> >>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-...
>
> >>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire
> >>> primary, Ron
> >>> > >> Paul
> >>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >>> > >> presidential
> >>> > >> > > > campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in
> >>> second
> >>> > >> place,
> >>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >>> > >> supporters at a
> >>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last
> >>> night
> >>> > >> was a
> >>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the
> >>> real
> >>> > >> > > > conversation."
>
> >>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >>> > >> 76-year-old
> >>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul
> >>> said
> >>> > >> after
> >>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted
> >>> to
> >>> > >> thank
> >>> > >> > > the
> >>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >>> > >> > > > He continued:
>
> >>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >>> > >> what--what is
> >>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> >>> > >> ignoring
> >>> > >> > > so
> >>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >>> > >> fascinating
> >>> > >> > > when
> >>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it
> >>> could be
> >>> > >> in the
> >>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of
> >>> have to
> >>> > >> chuckle
> >>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> >>> > >> thing they
> >>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status
> >>> quo
> >>> > >> of this
> >>> > >> > > > country.
>
> >>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul
> >>> was
> >>> > >> forced
> >>> > >> > > to cut
> >>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob
> >>> of more
> >>> > >> than
> >>> > >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> >>> > >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day
> >>> and a
> >>> > >> half,
> >>> > >> > > to
> >>> > >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters,
> >>> who are
> >>> > >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> >>> > >> > > atmosphere,"
> >>> > >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> >>> > >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting
> >>> out
> >>> > >> early
> >>> > >> > > from
> >>> > >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off,
> >>> cutting
> >>> > >> the
> >>> > >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> >>> > >> stopping."
>
> >>> > >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>> candidacy,
> >>> > >> > > called
> >>> > >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> >>> > >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> >>> > >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> >>> > >> > > --
> >>> > >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> > >> > > For options & help seehttp://
> >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> > >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> > >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> > >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> > >> --
> >>> > >> Thanks for
>
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment