deathbed to marry someone twenty three years his junior still exists
and is still that person......or no?? which is it?
The guy that materially supported freddy and fanny and even took their
money years later... the guy that said that Mitts plan for health was
great and supported the Hillary plan for health... he is still that
guy and truly has those same opinions today....
The difference is that this "GUY" actually did these things all on his
own...Everything from over twenty years ago that you are trying to
hang on Ron Paul was done by his staff adding his name as publisher...
unlike the "GUY" there is zero proof that he authored it or said
it....He does take the hit for having been the publisher and is
"morally" responsible.
That 'GUY" simply denies and or says he has changed...and or says he
was misunderstood... he never owns anything he actually did.
On Dec 30, 5:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *The Real Truth About Ron Paul:*
>
> VIDEO: Ron Paul takes credit for controversial newsletters in 1995
> video<http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/in-1995-video-ron-paul-takes-...>
>
> *We present you with the new news-oriented BuzzFeed:* This video is a
> not-so-positive revelation for the Ron Paul camp — Paul straight-up talking
> up the controversial newsletters that have suddenly cropped up in the press
> again amidst evidence of racism. He does seem quick to take credit for the
> Ron Paul Survival Report in this 1995 video. (As he puts it: "I also do an
> investment letter," which seems to imply he writes or at least edits it.)
> The question, obviously: Do the next 16 years make up for what came before
> this clip, anyway?
>
> =================
> *Ron Paul, In 1996, 'Did Not Deny' Controversial Statement In Newsletter ***
> **
> *http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/26/ron-paul-newsletters-swiftne...
> *
>
> NEW YORK CITY -- For the second time in as many runs for the Republican
> Party's presidential nomination, controversial newsletters Rep. Ron Paul
> (R-Texas) published in the 1980s and 90s are threatening his candidacy.
>
> The newsletters have plagued him since he ran to reclaim his seat in
> Congress in 1996. As he vies for an upset win in the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses, they
> continue to shadow him
> today<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/23/ron-paul-newsletter-media_n_...>.
> What's changed, from then to now, is Paul's explanation.
>
> Pressed recently<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/20/ron-paul-newsletters_n_11615...>about
> the contents of the Ron Paul Political Report, Ron Paul's Freedom
> Report, the Ron Paul Survival Report and the Ron Paul Investment Letter,
> Paul has simply denied direct involvement.
>
> "I didn't write them," he told
> CNN<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/23/ron-paul-newsletter-intervie...>,
> when asked about the newsletter's racist descriptions of urban society and
> paranoid conspiracy theories about federal government. "I disavow them.
> That's it."
>
> But since Paul spoke to CNN, a number of old videos have
> surfaced<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/23/ron-paul-newsletter-intervie...>showing
> him touting the newsletters that were being put out under his name.
> Paul's defenders have noted that even in those video clips, he does not
> claim authorship, which is true. Back when the issue first arose, however,
> he was willing to acknowledge that the words were his -- the only
> complaints he made were about context.
>
> The Huffington Post went through archived newspaper clips from Paul's '96
> congressional campaign against Lefty Morris and unearthed several new
> instances of Paul or his campaign pleading for a more sympathetic
> understanding of what he wrote.
>
> *The Dallas Morning News* -- May 22, 1996.
>
> Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not
> evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read
> and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation.
>
> Dr. Paul also took exception to the comments of Mr. Bledsoe, saying that
> the voters in the 14th District and the people who know him best would be
> the final judges of his character.
>
> "If someone challenges your character and takes the interpretation of the
> NAACP as proof of a man's character, what kind of a world do you live in?"
> Dr. Paul asked.
>
> *In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the
> swiftness of black men.*
> *
>
> "If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no
> chance to catch them," Dr. Paul said.
> *
>
> *Austin American-Statesman* -- May 23, 1996
>
> "Dr. Paul is being quoted out of context," [Paul's spokesman, Michael]
> Sullivan said. "It's like picking up 'War and Peace' and reading the fourth
> paragraph on page 481 and thinking you can understand what's going on."
>
> "*You have to understand what he is writing.* Democrats in Texas are trying
> to stir things up by using half quotes to impugn his character," Sullivan
> said. "His writings are intellectual. He assumes people will do their own
> research, get their own statistics, think for themselves and make informed
> judgments."
>
> *Austin American-Statesman* -- July 25, 1996
>
> Morris distributed Paul's article to reporters at a Capitol news
> conference. It was not the first time. Morris has been scrutinizing Paul's
> writings and sharing his findings with reporters. In May, he released an
> article in which Paul described a majority of black men in Washington,
> D.C., as ''semi-criminal or entirely criminal.''
>
> Morris, a Bee Cave lawyer, once again called on Paul to release back copies
> of the newsletter he has published for more than a decade. Paul, a Surfside
> obstetrician, has refused.
>
> *He said he has written ''thousands of items'' during the past 20 years and
> that releasing these materials would be impractical.* Paul said releasing
> all those writings would be like asking Morris to ''provide documents for
> every lawsuit he has been involved in during his lengthy legal career.''
>
> A request for comment from the Paul campaign was not immediately returned.
>
> ===============
>
> *A Collection of Ron Paul's Most Incendiary Newsletters*
>
> For years, Ron Paul published a series of newsletters that dispensed
> political news and investment advice, but also routinely indulged in
> bigotry. Here's a selection of some especially inflammatory passages, with
> links to scanned images of the original documents in which they appeared.
>
> *Race*
>
> "A Special Issue on Racial
> Terrorism<http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_June92_p1.pdf>"
> analyzes the Los Angeles riots of 1992:
> "Order<http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_June92_p6.pdf>was
> only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up
> their
> welfare checks three days after rioting began. ... What if the checks had
> never arrived? No
> doubt<http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_June92_p7.pdf>the
> blacks would have fully privatized the welfare state through continued
> looting. But they were paid off and the violence subsided."
>
> The November 1990 issue of the *Political Report* had kind
> words<http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Nov90_p3.pdf>for David
> Duke <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Nov90_p4.pdf>.
>
> This December 1990
> <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Dec90_p8.pdf>newsletter
> describes Martin Luther King Jr. as "a world-class adulterer"
> who "seduced underage girls and boys" and "replaced the evil of forced
> segregation with the evil of forced integration."
>
> A February 1991
> <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Feb91_p7.pdf>newsletter
> attacks "The X-Rated Martin Luther King."
>
> An October 1990
> <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_Oct90_p4.pdf>edition of the
> *Political Report* ridicules black activists, led by Al Sharpton, for
> demonstrating at the Statue of Liberty in favor of renaming New York City
> after Martin Luther King. The newsletter suggests that "Welfaria,"
> "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg,"and "Lazyopolis " would be better
> alternatives—and says, "Next time, hold that demonstration at a food stamp
> bureau or a crack house."
>
> A May 1990 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/May1990.pdf> issue of
> the *Ron Paul Political Report** *cites Jared Taylor, who six months later
> would go onto found the eugenicist and white supremacist periodical *American
> Renaissance.
> *
>
> The January 1993
> <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1993.pdf>issue of the
> *Survival Report* worries about America's "disappearing white majority."
>
> The July 1992 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_July92_p3.pdf> *Ron
> Paul Political Report** *declares, "Jury verdicts, basketball games, and
> even music are enough to set off black rage, it seems," and defends David
> Duke. The author of the newsletter—presumably Paul—writes, "My youngest son
> is starting his fourth year in medical school. He tells me there would be
> no way to persuade his fellow students of the case for economic liberty."
>
> A March 1993 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/March1993.pdf> *Survival
> Report** *describes Bill Clinton's supposedly "illegitimate children, black
> and white: 'woods colts' in backwoods slang."
>
> *Gays*
>
> The December 1989 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/December1989.pdf>
> *Ron Paul Political Report** *contains entries on a "new form of racial
> terrorism," cites former Congressman Bill Dannemeyer's claim that "the
> average homosexual has 1,000 or more partners in a lifetime," and quotes
> Lew Rockwell, president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, in the third
> person.
>
> In January 1990 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/January1990.pdf>,
> the *Ron Paul Political Report *cites "a well-known libertarian editor" who
> "told me: 'The ACT-UP slogan on stickers plastered all over Manhattan is
> 'Silence=Death.' But shouldn't it be *Sodomy* = Death'?"
>
> The September 1994<http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/September1994.pdf>issue
> of the
> *Ron Paul Survival Report** *states that "those who don't commit sodomy,
> who don't get blood a transfusion, and who don't swap needles, are
> virtually assured of not getting AIDS unless they are deliberately infected
> by a malicious gay."*
> *
>
> The June 1990 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/PR_June90_p6.pdf>issue
> of the
> *Political Report* says: "I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of
> the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them
> to hide their activities."
>
> A January 1994 <http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/SR_Jan94_p5.pdf>edition
> of the
> *Survival Report* states that "gays in San Francisco do not obey the
> dictates of good sense," adding: "[T]hese men don't really see a reason to
> live past their fifties. They are not married, they have no children, and
> their lives are centered on new sexual partners." Also, "they enjoy the
> attention and pity that comes with ...
>
> read more »
>
> CrazyUncleRon..jpg
> 24KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment