Hey Bruce,
Dr. Paul said it, during one of the debates, (I think the third debate)
I don't necessarily agree with most of what Mark just wrote, although I think it simplifies the status of the United States' Middle Eastern Foreign Policy. I reject the notion that the United States is some type of an interventionist war mongering Nation. That's simply not true.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
I doubt he said that
On Sunday, November 20, 2011, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's funny. I could have sworn some raghead Jihadists destroyed a
> marine> barracks, two US Embassies in Africa, and almost sunk a
> warship in the> 1990′s and ended up killing 3,000 Americans on our own
> soil in a few> minute's time one fine September morning.
>
>
> Lets see..... the present course of action has seen the USA help in
> the FOUNDING of at least two firmly entrenched radical Islam/anti-
> America governments, third out of four has point blank said that if
> there was a choice between helping an Islamic country or the USA they
> would help the Islamic state. The fourth, the one the USA has NO
> interest in, now or ever, is the only one that will come out of recent
> conflict as moderate and progressive.
>
> Given the constant state of "alerts" in the USA the wars have done
> NOTHING to make you more secure... other than to be secure in the loss
> of basic rights.
>
> Just exactly what is wrong with the "rule of law"? Just what do you
> have against the constitution that is forcing you into the the "war
> powers" and "(un)patriot act" corner?
>
> The standing army is not a good idea... A well armed ...in every way..
> defense force is. Had the Air Force done its duty on 9-11 no planes
> would have hit the towers... had the ships watch done its duty the
> Cole would not have been harmed... etc. etc. etc. NONE of the
> protocol was followed in any of these cases.. this resulted in the
> successful attacks.
>
> I have "0" problem with not allowing a plane, ship, or automobile that
> carries a Muslim to enter US space. Just quit playing politics with
> the world, bomb Irans nuke plant, cut off aid to Muslim countries etc.
> But don't play with boots on the ground.. it has not worked in over 50
> years.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 9:26 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ron Paul said today that he could see no possible reason to ever launch
>> military action or initiate a war.
>>
>> I'm convinced now, that Ron Paul has become a complete buffoonish nitwit,
>> either hopelessly naive, or plain stupid. I'd like to hope it's the former,
>> but as the days wear on and I listen to his insane anti-war rantings, I'm
>> not so sure anymore.
>>
>> How can anyone even consider this 'Feel-The-Love' Libertarian for the helm
>> of Commander-In-Chief?
>>
>> Jihadists all over the world are vowing our destuction. Ahmadinejad of Iran
>> is vowing to wipe out "The Great Satan" and usher in the Islamic Messiah.
>> Nukes are being sought by Al Qaeda and being developed by Jihad states.
>> Plans for mass death and mayhem in American neighborhoods and schools have
>> been recovered from Jihad base camps.
>>
>> Ron Paul says he sees no possible reason to EVER launch military action or
>> go to war.
>>
>> The guy is on some serious LSD, or he has a hippie Love Fest hangover with
>> his pals at moveon.org and other Left-wing Anti-war groups of mostly 60′s
>> anti-war retreads.
>>
>> No possible reason to EVER launch military action???
>> Hey Paulie Girl! Remember this???
>>
>> *(Picture of the WTC)*
>>
>> Or do you think some 17th Century letter of Marque and Reprisal would
>> better deal with the global beast that is militant Islam? But then, if
>> Jihad homicide bombers kill themselves by killing Americans then the idea
>> of letters of marque are a bit stupid are they not?? The perps are already
>> DEAD.
>>
>> Of course some Libertarians not smoking a bong would think that Letters of
>> Marque and Reprisal is a workable option – except they be hypocrites
>> considering they are the loudest voices of opposition to Blackwater USA,
>> which is essentially the posse a Letter of Reprisal would merit.
>>
>> Yes, methinks Ron Paul has had too many tokes from the doobie or a major
>> contact high from his hippie fans piled in the Ron Paul '08 VW Van
>> considering his foray into an alternate reality where giving peace a chance
>> defeats Jihadists hell bent on world domination.
>>
>> But let's take a look at Ron Paul's latest Blame America Pacifistic
>> sonata<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR200...>
>> .
>>
>> In an interview with Washingtonpost.com's PostTalk program, the Texas
>> congressman said he could see "no reason" to justify military action if he
>> were elected president. He compared the United States to a schoolyard bully
>> and said the country has no reason to flex its muscles overseas.
>>
>> 3,000 dead Americans whose blood cries out to us disagree with you Mr.
>> Paul. Of course you are of the Osama Bin Laden opinion that America
>> deserved 9-11, due our presence in the Middle East and the world.
>>
>> "There's nobody in this world that could possibly attack us today," he said
>> in the interview.
>>
>> That's funny. I could have sworn some raghead Jihadists destroyed a marine
>> barracks, two US Embassies in Africa, and almost sunk a warship in the
>> 1990′s and ended up killing 3,000 Americans on our own soil in a few
>> minute's time one fine September morning.
>>
>> "I mean, we could defend this country with a few good submarines. If
>> anybody dared touch us we could wipe any country off of the face of the
>> earth within hours.
>>
>> Oh really? And what nation should we have wiped off the earth after 9-11?
>> Afghanistan? Saudi Arabia? Yemen? Egypt? All four?
>>
>> You bother to READ Islamic prophecy and what both Bin laden and Ahmadinejad
>> WANT Mr. Paul?
>>
>> Of course not.
>>
>> Otherwise you would not be an appeasement stooge for them, playing into
>> their foremost desires to martyr entire Muslim nations before the final
>> great battle they promise will destroy the West.
>>
>> And here we are, so intimidated and so insecure and we're acting like such
>> bullies that we have to attack third-world nations that have no military
>> and have no weapon."
>>
>> It was amazing what their trained warrior Jihadists were able to accomplish
>> with just a few boxcutters and some training on U.S. soil thanks to our
>> Immigration policies.
>>
>> 3,000 American dead. Billions in destruction.
>>
>> Wonder what the same kind of barbarians would be able to accomplish WITH
>> substantive weapons and the willpower to use them to kill us all Mr. Paul?
>>
>> Nah, your feeble mind refused to grasp reality and the concept the 9-11
>> reality woke us up to.
>>
>> Ron Paul, you are become a disgrace. An embarrassment. Just like the
>> hippies of old – you are high and you stink.
>>
>> If we keep listening to this foreign policy idiot, we're going to need some
>> heavy ludes to calm us down, but Ron Paul is already there on the mellow
>> yellow submarine of psychedelic pacifism. Pass the 'shrooms and get ready
>> to go far out man, all the way back to the 1700′s when men wore wigs and
>> the biggest weapon was a ten pound cannonball. Yup, those days of Marque
>> and Reprisal are sure to put a stop to Al Qaeda today. Of course there's
>> this little problem with the fact Congress passed a law forbidding the
>> assassination of any foreign leaders or rogues – but hey – whose counting
>> facts? Let's wrap ourselves in the parchment of the Constitution and
>> pretend the real world melts in it's presence.
>>
>> Kindof how our faces seem to melt with the heavy drugs Ron Paul must be
>> freebasing.
>>
>> Someone wake up Ronnie there – before some Jihadist hands him a hooka next
>> and he smokes some more appeasement propaganda.
>>
>> http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/ron-paul-is-hopelessl...
>>
>> 9-11.jpg
>> 112KViewDownload
>>
>> Paul2012..jpg
>> 185KViewDownload
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment