---
how much does the job pay?
seriously, count me in as a supporter of your new constitution
C Rice fucked up what could have been a great career. She stopped
listening to her mentor.
On Jun 4, 5:45 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Plainol...: Have you considered becoming my front man?! Thanks
> for agreeing with the importance of our INDIVIDUAL common bonds.
> Condoleezza Rice, the smart ex Secretary of State, sees the importance
> of having united INDIVIDUALS rather than fighting group-against-group
> all the time. More need to agree with that concept. — J. A.
> Armistead — Patriot
>
> On Jun 3, 3:13 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > We're One Nation of individuals?
> > I like it.
> > Until ethnic, cultural and minority groups see themselves as US
> > citizens first they'll never really be Americans.
>
> > On Jun 2, 3:21 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear plainolamerican: If the only... "control" is the democracy votes
> > > of the people, things will be in dangerous flux. However, my New
> > > Constitution has about 20% devoted to explaining those things that are
> > > outside the authority of government. The best short summary of the
> > > ideals of my New Constitution are in the New 'Pledge to Allegiance to
> > > the Flag': "I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of
> > > America and to the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it stands.
> > > We're One Nation of individuals who champion fair play, maximum civil
> > > liberties, the Right of Self-determination, and having an efficient,
> > > unobtrusive and deferential government." Socialism and communism are
> > > ruled out for not being fair. So, Democracy on demand can never screw
> > > things up! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > On Jun 2, 12:25 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > We could do better by just giving the vote to the first 100 people to
> > > > cross Main Street! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
> > > > ---
> > > > speculation noted
>
> > > > Why do democracies fail? Two of the major reasons are: 1)
> > > > democracies generally progress through an initial period from bondage
> > > > to spiritual faith escalating to the point where the citizens become
> > > > totally dependent on the government to where they eventually revert
> > > > back to bondage, and 2) once the democracy shows signs of prosperity,
> > > > citizens vote themselves generous bounties from the public treasury.
>
> > > > On May 26, 7:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > MJ: What "definition" is that? That an anti-democracy and anti-
> > > > > Republic oligarchy has more power than the former two? The US senate
> > > > > is THE most corrupt band of career politicians on planet Earth! We
> > > > > could do better by just giving the vote to the first 100 people to
> > > > > cross Main Street! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > On May 26, 1:32 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Again, Constitutional is of or by the Constitution.
> > > > > > The Senate is constitutional -- by definition.
> > > > > > Until the removal of the check with Amendment 17 (not properly ratified per Article V), the Senate was the 'representative' of the States -- those entities forming the United States (plural).
> > > > > > Contrary to your insistence, the Constitution does not create this idea of mob rule to which you are so enamored and believe will *magically* correct ills.
> > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > --MJ
> > > > > > Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic ... Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based on deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, or impulse, without restraint or regard to the consequences. Result is demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
> > > > > > -- U.S. Army training manual No. 2000-25 (1928-1932)Dear MJ: The Founding Fathers were BLACKMAILED into including a
> > > > > > senate, because small states feared being exploited by larger states.
> > > > > > The senate is an oligarchy that slaps-in-the-face our Representative
> > > > > > Republic. Since principles of FAIRNESS are so evident throughout the
> > > > > > main body of the Constitution, then, the VICTOR in disputes has to be
> > > > > > the side favoring fair play and democracy! The mere fact that the
> > > > > > senate was included in the Constitution doesn't make that
> > > > > > constitutional! Just because 'laws' are passed doesn't make those
> > > > > > constitutional, either. The US Senate has been a drag of fair play
> > > > > > and democracy from day one! For the record, the US Supreme Court,
> > > > > > wherein one justice has a power greater than Congress, or the People,
> > > > > > is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Learn, if you can, MJ. So far you seem
> > > > > > committed to a lifetime of taking-over your flunked courses in how to
> > > > > > think. — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > On May 25, 9:43 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > The US Senate, which was originally selected by the legislatures of
> > > > > > > the several states, was an ill conceived OLIGARCHY. Since there has
> > > > > > > never been a parity of the population served by each senator, that
> > > > > > > means the USA has two conflicting political systems, and the oligarchy
> > > > > > > is the one which isn't FAIR. Giving undue power to smaller population
> > > > > > > states slaps REPUBLIC ideas in the face. So, the US Senate is and
> > > > > > > always has been, unconstitutional.The Senate -- by definition -- cannot be unconstitutional.
> > > > > > > What you (continue) fail to grasp is that the Constitution is/was an agreement between Sovereign States. The Senate is THEIR representative body. Amendment 17 curtailed yet another check on Federal power.
> > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > --MJ
> > > > > > > The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment