Re: Social Security vs Pensions

You can't collect Social Security if you have never worked, or paid
in.
So your analogy is false.

There are a lot of over 65 widows that would really disagree with you.

On May 20, 2:47 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 1:00 pm, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Studio,
>
> > "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you
> > paid in either retard."
>
> > Your analogy is seriously flawed.
>
> Nothing flawed about it, other than the comprehension levels of some
> of the people reading it.
>
> > Wealthy or poor, if you drive a car
> > you have the potential to have an accident and need insurance.
>
> True. So...
>
> > However, if Social Security worked as you propose, then someone
> > meeting your definition of wealth would have no chance of ever
> > collecting.
>
> And so do you think they would rather have the Social Security instead
> of the wealth?
>
> > So, really, what you're suggesting is that someone who
> > doesn't drive should still be paying car insurance to help pay for the
> > insurance of those who do.
>
> No, what I'm suggesting is *everyone* who works, pay insurance for
> *everyone* who works.
> Then the insurance be paid out to those who need it, instead of those
> who don't.
>
> You can't collect Social Security if you have never worked, or paid
> in.
> So your analogy is false.
>
> Keith in Köln
>
> > Geesh Frank!
> > That made sense! Do you expect a Moonbat to comprehend or understand
> > this? Studio is looking like a deer in the headlights right now!!
>
> It's better than that; a deer that's driving the semi that's gonna run
> some weasels over.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.