conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
having you "get real" too much to ask? — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> questions posed to you.)
>
> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> > Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > your own. � J. A. A. �
> > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
>
> >> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> >>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> >>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> >>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> >>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> >>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead �
> >>> Patriot
> >>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> John,
> >>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> >>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
> >>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> >>>> tremendous task?
> >>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> >>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> >>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> >>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> >>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> >>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> >>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> >>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! � John
> >>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> >>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled that
> >>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> >>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> >>>>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> >>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> >>>>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> >>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> >>>>>>>>>>> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> >>>>>>>>>>> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! � J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> �
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> >>>>>>>>> differs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> >>>>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> >>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> >>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> >>>>>>>>> game
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> >>>>>>>>> candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> say, should rally behind my New Constitution�a document for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> people! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead want to dictate what
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment