Thursday, April 21, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: My New Constitution makes it a crime for any public
official to "tag" anyone as being left or right. The USA will survive
ONLY if all group-against-group fighting stops! Capitalism will
benefit all the people, not just the had-been conservatives. Less
expensive government leaves more money in people's pockets. And that
will encourage more charity close to home. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 20, 12:43 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Rush Limbaugh is at best a neo-conservative who spouts off when "the
> left" does something insane but keeps his mouth shut when "the right"
> does the same insane thing. He does nothing more than perpetuate a
> left-right war of the mindless for profit.
>
> Anyone who blindly sides with "the left" or "the right" is someone who
> does not think for themselves.
>
> On 04/20/2011 01:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Mark:  Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish?  Rush
> > Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in
> > America.  He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the
> > balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this
> > country from the socialist-communists.  If you aren't an American,
> > then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country.
> > Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left.  If
> > I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
> > Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed.  ï¿½  John A.
> > Armistead �  Patriot
> > On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
> >> say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
> >> world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
> >> anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
> >> meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
>
> >> As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
> >> has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
> >> last ten years ??
>
> >> On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
>
> >>> Dear Mark:  Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
> >>> the news and think about what is going on in the world.  I simply
> >>> don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
> >>> that's everywhere.  Listen to Rush Limbaugh.  He has the world
> >>> situation pegged fairly well.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> >>> On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>> Einstein,
> >>>> Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> >>>> give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> >>>> there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
> >>>> Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> >>>> considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
> >>>> Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> >>>> about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> >>>> (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> >>>> clear and present danger??
> >>>> On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> >>>>> naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>> their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>> better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> >>>>> time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> >>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> >>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> >>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> >>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> >>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  ï¿½ John
> >>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> >>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.&  N.).  I'm thrilled that
> >>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> >>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> >>>>>>>>>> turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> >>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> >>>>>>>>>> doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> >>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> >>>>>>>>>>> millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> >>>>>>>>>>> citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  ï¿½ J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> �
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>   John,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> >>>>>>>>> differs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> >>>>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment