This week Glenn Beck compared Judaism and Islam. He's right that Jews
are less harsh in dealing with 'prohibited' activities than Muslims.
But, apparently, Beck hasn't considered the "hidden dangers" posed by
the Jews in Israel that hurt the chances the world can avoid humanity-
threatening conflicts. To wit: Following WWII, and the admittedly
terrible Holocaust, Jews were a race without a nation. Over the ages
Jews had had legitimate claim to much of the Holy Land. But that land
had since ceded to those of the Muslim faith. By force of armed
conflict, Jews confiscated the land of Muslims without fair
compensation. Though they had the 'nation' they so desired, it was a
nation obtained by immoral acts, including murder, covetousness and
grand theft. In "celebration" of the new nation of Israel, the USA
formed an alliance to protect Israel from armed aggression. Isn't it
ironic that our country had not considered it… "worthy" to come to the
aid of those Muslims driven from the Holy Land?
Because the US regularly sides with Jewish crooks and uses our
military might to neutralize those who are only seeking justice, the
USA has become a despised nation. Our capitalist successes have made
us look like crooks in those realms, too. Thousands of Americans have
died and are dying in the wars being fought. And perhaps millions of
Americans, and that many more of our allies, are now living in fear of
terrorism… Such would NOT be the case if Jews hadn't felt "entitled"
to be crooks because of the Holocaust. True to form, Jews take every
opportunity for selfish gain, without considering the morality of
their actions.
Muslims deserve to be treated fairly. Understandably, the nation of
Israel is an affront to the moral sensibilities of Muslims. My book,
"The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity", touts how FAIR
capitalist successes—evenly spread throughout all the peoples of the
world—can foster world peace, harmony and prosperity. Such successes
can be more profound than ever experienced by the vast majority of
Muslims. *** As I see it, Israel has a moral obligation to help
foster capitalist successes within Muslim nations. Unless they
willingly do so, the world will remain just hours away from a world
war more terrible than anyone can imagine, and more terrible than any
of the 'punishments' Muslims use on those breaking their rules—beyond
which Glenn Beck, apparently, has not seen.
Instead of the trillions of dollars being spent to defend Israel and
to fight their wars for them, that money should be spent to equitably
turn Israel into a model two-race nation. That's just a concept, mind
you. I can envision an Architectural Master Plan that layers and
weaves quality working and living spaces on the limited land
available. Holy places common to both religions should become neutral
territory, with wise controlled-access being allowed for all who
respect the sanctity of the spaces. Where there are now rock piles,
there should become gardens! The goal should be to once again make
Israel a safe destination for those interested in religious history.
The Jewish Temple, at least partially, should be reconstructed, NOT as
an affront to those of other faiths, but as a tribute to the
technological achievements of those from other ages. Muslim places of
high importance should be developed for high purposes, too.
Progress toward peace and prosperity can happen rapidly, IF Muslims
will start correcting their very bad public relations—like yesterday.
When the Koran was written, the world was composed largely of warring
barbarians. Religious ritual was a way to separate friend from foe.
The more loyal a follower, the more committed that person was to the
rituals of his faith. Intended or not, that "empty ritual", which I
abhor, has brainwashed Muslims till they are… the most mass-minded
people on Earth. Muslims have little or no individual moral
sensibility to question the harsh punishments of 'sinners'. Their
only standard is a largely barbaric religious code that has never been
brought into the civilized age.
Glenn Beck talks about the billions of 'bad' Muslims. Where are
others, such as me, to propose that there be concerted efforts to make
this world economically and socially FAIR within every nation? I'm
betting that terrorism and wars won't even be considered, once Muslims
start sharing in the simple capitalist successes that countries like
the USA and Israel have for too long kept the knack-for-obtaining
secret from others. We live on one, common, planet Earth, people!
Teaching capitalism for the benefit of the uninitiated, will
eventually benefit every one of us in the long run. That is my hope
and dream!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on sci.physics news group.
>
On Mar 13, 11:51 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Folks: As closely as possible, following the outline of our original
> Constitution, is the attached Article from my New Constitution.:
>
> "Article V:
>
> Section 1, 2 & 3: Whenever 50% of the House deems necessary, the
> House may propose amendments to the New Constitution, or call a
> convention for proposing amendments; such may be ratified in a one
> day, direct referendum of the People of all the states and
> territories, provided 60% of the registered voters who vote concur.
> The New Constitution and laws and treaties made under the
> authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land,
> and judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Nothing in a state
> constitution can be to the contrary. Before taking a public office or
> job, representatives, members of the legislatures, all executive and
> judicial officers—of the United States and of the several states and
> local governments—and all employees of those who regularly deal with
> the Public, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to have read the
> entire New Constitution within the last 30 days and to support such.
> No religious oath or action shall be used as part of the qualification
> for any office, public trust or job.
> To form more perfect government, the House may authorize tests of
> variations of government or laws that are, in the main, consistent
> with the intents of this New Constitution. With the assent of 55% of
> the legislature or legislatures of the state(s) involved, such tests
> may encompass one or several states for a period of time sufficient to
> evaluate performance. Subsequently, the House may vote to pass laws
> of national scope on the issues tested. Conflicts arising from the
> test(s) shall be resolved in the courts using this New Constitution
> and apt federal laws, but with no intent at any time to punish those
> persons, groups or states for their involvement in the test, done for
> the common good."
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> Those who are interested are invited to read my just-published book,
> "The Shortest Distance, Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. &
> N.). Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 10:22 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: Some shallow, at Google or otherwise, changed the title of
> > this post to "… Empty Rhetoric" rather than "… Empty Ritual". I was
> > unable to reply and to have the latter, correct name of my original
> > post be included. That's important so all excerpts from my New
> > Constitution can be found under one heading.
>
> > Note: The reason I used "… Empty Ritual" relates as much to religions
> > and social habits as it does to our government—which is more
> > interested in form and process than in getting results that will be
> > beneficial to the vast majority (60% plus) of Americans.
>
> > I am cutting, pasting and re posting the last two replies I made to
> > Keith in Koln.
>
> > Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
> > father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
> > frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
> > "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
> > the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
> > experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
> > police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
> > not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
> > for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
> > latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
> > presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury
> > has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be
> > the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... ***
> > Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not
> > guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!
>
> > I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said
> > anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others.
> > Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:
>
> > "Article III:
>
> > Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
> > such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
> > interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
> > rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
> > laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
> > Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
> > as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
> > from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
> > such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
> > executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
> > justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
> > good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
> > or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
> > nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
> > high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
> > nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
> > shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
> > yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
> > make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on
> > their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel
> > shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of
> > seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters
> > nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren't
> > royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
> > superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
> > lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
> > in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
> > socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
> > Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
> > State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
> > stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
> > addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
> > respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
> > pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
> > begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: "The justice system is
> > on trial." All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for
> > one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall
> > not—on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
> > gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
> > process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
> > respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
> > to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
>
> > Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the
> > People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption
> > within any arm of government—including the entire judicial system—
> > judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing,
> > favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law
> > enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges,
> > justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful
> > acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to
> > respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government
> > official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be
> > guilty of a felony. The determination of the above status shall be
> > made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a yea vote of 1/3
> > of the House, a national public trial, televised from the House, shall
> > be held regarding all named parties—with judgment being determined via
> > referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered voters who vote determine
> > that there is guilt, the government officials, judges, justices and/or
> > members of law enforcement shall be removed from their former
> > positions and sentenced commensurate with their crimes, up to and
> > including the death penalty.
> > Judicial authority shall extend to all cases in law and equity
> > arising under this New Constitution, the laws of the United States,
> > treaties made or which shall be made under their authority, to all
> > cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, to
> > all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to controversies in
> > which the United States is a party, to controversies between two or
> > more states, between a state and Citizens of another state, between
> > Citizens of different states, between Citizens of the same state
> > claiming lands under grants of different states or the Citizens
> > thereof, and foreign states, Citizens or subjects. The Supreme Court
> > shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors
> > and consuls, and those in which a state is a party. In all other
> > cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate juris-diction both as to
> > law and to fact—with such exceptions and under such regulations as the
> > House shall make. Except in cases of impeachment, the trial of all
> > crimes shall be by jury in the state where said crimes were allegedly
> > committed, or if otherwise, where the House directs. Misdemeanors and
> > crimes occurring conjunctively shall be tried with the more serious
> > crime, unless the disproving of the misdemeanor would excuse the
> > crime. If either occurred in multiple jurisdictions, the trial shall
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment