On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:38 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com> wrote:
CLASSIFIED means under the table. Way under. Welcome to Earth.
He had the authority to download them. He did NOT have the authority
to hand them out. He broke the law. Lots of them. Thats frowned
upon here. Even moreso by the military. That means jail. A whole
lotta jail.
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
On Apr 1, 1:26 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see that just as Einstein does not answer questions, neither do you.
>
> If the US were doing business above the table instead of below it there
> would be no need.
>
> Now answer the questions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > You want all Americans privvy to drone footage and classified
> > documents?
>
> > Thats nice, but its a court martial offence(s), and Manning not only
> > knew that, but bragged about it. That makes him both dumb and a
> > criminal. The UCMJ is most unforgiving on this shit. He's toast, and
> > Julian can laugh all the way to the bank.
>
> > Good deal there Brad.
>
> > On Apr 1, 12:31 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Greg,
>
> > > Other than the intangible pride and feelings of a few politicians and
> > > professional scoundrels explain to me just who and what was damaged by
> > > Mannings act of moral conscious.
>
> > > Then explain why an act of moral consciousness that falls well within the
> > > scope of truth, honesty and openness that ALL Americans expect from their
> > > Government and its actions is truly wrong.
>
> > > Was there an intent to damage or to simply throw light on the wrongs
> > being
> > > done ??
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > It *may* certainly *have* been the property of the US Government at
> > > > some time ...
>
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ
>
> > > > Still is. Manning is gonna die in jail as an old man.
>
> > > > All hail WikiLeaks.
>
> > > > On Apr 1, 8:58 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > It *may* certainly *have* been the property of the US Government at
> > some
> > > > time ...
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJ"The Nazi party was elected to office by the freely cast ballots
> > of
> > > > millions of German voters . . . . In the national election of July
> > 1932, the
> > > > Nazis obtained 37 percent of the vote and a plurality of seats in the
> > > > Reichstag. On January 30, 1933, in full accordance with the country's
> > legal
> > > > and constitutional principles, Hitler was appointed Chancellor. Five
> > weeks
> > > > later, in the last (and semi-free) election of the pre-totalitarian
> > period,
> > > > the Nazis obtained 17 million votes, 44 percent of the total.The voters
> > were
> > > > aware of the Nazi ideology.
> > > > > "Nazi literature, including statements of the Nazi plans for the
> > future,
> > > > papered the country during the last years of the Weimar Republic. Mein
> > Kampf
> > > > alone sold more than 200,000 copies between 1925 and 1932. The essence
> > of
> > > > the political system which Hitler intended to establish in Germany was
> > > > clear. -- Leonard PeikoffAt 08:54 AM 4/1/2011, you wrote:What makes
> > > > camera footage from US drones, and documents from military
> > > > > databases, US Property?
> > > > > Really?
> > > > > On Mar 31, 1:11 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > Assange had no right to disseminate ANYTHING that belonged to the
> > > > United States, (e.g.;you and I) and I don't give a crap where he was
> > > > propped up at. In this case, "MIght Makes Right"; and Assange was
> > warned a
> > > > number of times NOT to publish information that didn't belong to him,
> > but
> > > > rather, belonged to us.What made this 'US Property'?
> > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > --MJ... where corruption and public crimes are not carefully
> > opposed,
> > > > and severely punished, neither liberty nor security can possibly
> > subsist. --
> > > > Cato's Letters (1721)
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > --
> > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *Presidente, Piroliticos del Sur*
> > > *440 Mtrs Este del Cementerio*
> > > *Uvita de Osa, Puntarenas *
> > > *2743-8142, 8607-7648*
> > > *markmka...@gmail.com*- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *
> *- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment