You have several things working against you.
Not only does Amendment I apply (Congress shall make no law ... free speech),
there is no Power provided the Congress within the Constitution to 'regulate' or
'restrict' or otherwise 'campaigns'.
Money is most certainly speech -- whether it consists of 'hiring' someone to
best spread your message OR the measure for the success of a business or
enterprise.
Regard$,
--MJ
You should see what the law professors on the H-LAW mailing list are saying about yesterday's Supreme Court First Amendment decision. Allowing people to purchase political ads and make political films without government regulation is, it seems, the end of the world. -- Kevin Gutzman on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
At 12:41 PM 10/16/2010, you wrote:
This is a close call.... mike.....Freedom of Speech is Freedom of
Speech..... but, like I said elsewhere... political donations...
money... is not speech (in my opinion). I would think that, as long as
the "person" doing the speech is an "individual" then the money end
(advertising access costs) associated with his/her political speech
need not be disclosed... but when the "individual" becomes a
"political advocacy group" of any sort, then where the money comes
from should be disclosed...But, of course, there's a Criminally
Crooked Supreme Court Majority to contend with.....currently.
http://van-ezproxy.vancouver.wsu.edu/pag/index.html
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
http://www.uschamber.org
E-Mail: mbrsvcs@uschamber.org
1615 H St. NW
Washington, DC 20062-2000
Phone: 202-659-6000, 800-638-6582
Fax: 202-463-3190 "We protect and represent you so your business can
grow and prosper in a free market economy."
( http://www.uschamber.org)
Then there's Karl Rove...
http://prairieweather.typepad.com/big_blue_stem/2010/10/suing-one-of-karl-roves-groups.html
http://politics.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/10/06/karl-rove-backed-group-spends-as-much-as-political-parties.html
On Oct 16, 10:41 am, "mike [ proud to be a liberal ] 532 !"
<littlemike...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the court has opened the door for other governments to chose our
> leaders .
>
> On Oct 16, 10:37 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > That s what Republican campaign fund-raising groups are doing by
> > concealing their donors from the public.
> > ROTFLMAO!
> > Individuals, of course, have a right to privacy.
> > BOTH Republicans AND Democrats fo not trust Americans, but
> > it is with their lives (of course they are Peddling Pull to maintain
> > their Power).
> > Regard$,
> > --MJYou should see what the law professors on the H-LAW mailing list are saying about yesterday's Supreme Court First Amendment decision. Allowing people to purchase political ads and make political films without government regulation is, it seems, the end of the world. -- Kevin Gutzman on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment