The only post in this thread to offer a link is the opening post.
Everyone 'so far' has offered nonsupporting claims, the conversation
is nowhere because even the rebuttals offer no substantiation. This
has nothing to do with interpretation of the link nor my personal
agreement or disagreement with it; just a recognition.
There must be, in this day of technological achievement read your
drivers license from the moon age, some shred of evidence to back up
what you are all saying. Providing some form of validity to a claim
lays waste the slag from the rebuttals that is the unsupported
rebuttals.
Or is this equally all posters personal bias born from tons of other
hearsay?
The real dilemma is having to decipher the validity of opposing
evidences. Whose truth is the truth?
How about................
All politicians are to some degree inept and in less technical terms,
all BS, and maybe all the people in this room could runs things
better.
In all the years we have been listening to political rhetoric not much
has changed, that is except the hands that stand at the helm and the
excuses as to why the citizens, who pay these people lot's of money to
take charge, are continually in a quagmire. At every election they
get up on the soap box and preach about how they are going to fix the
problems the other guy made.
It's too late to find fault that results in a rectified situation; at
this point fault only becomes the fodder for heated debate without
resolution, much of which we have here. Politics is a shouting match
and a mud slinging contest and on rare occasions some good shit
happens.
On Sep 2, 7:38 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> What is false. You throw unsupported claims out there and assume we
> will accept them but if we should refute them then you call it twisted
> pretzel logic. Must be nice to be you and make those claims and think
> they will fly.
>
> On 09/02/2010 08:26 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>
> > *Twisted pretzel logic, and quite false.*
>
> > On 9/1/10, *dick thompson* <rhomp2...@earthlink.net
> > <mailto:rhomp2...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
>
> > You will have to remind me what countless ethics investigations
> > she failed. From what I recall the only thing she failed was one
> > funding question. The rest of the ethics investigations were
> > dropped as having no basis. You really must tell us what else
> > she failed. She cleaned up the government of Alaska and settled
> > issues with Canada and the oil companies that had been hanging
> > fire for years. She lowered the budget of the state. What exams
> > did she fail. That has never been brought up before and if she
> > had failed I am sure the Dems would have been happy to inform us
> > during the campaign. The other thing is that she has never
> > attempted to hide her grades or her friends or where she lived
> > when she attended the colleges that she paid her own way to
> > attend. She always knew what the Bush Doctrine was. The
> > problem was that there were several of them as those in the Bush
> > administration have told us countless times. Her question was
> > which doctrine did Charlie Gibson want to discuss. Of course he
> > was not aware as she was that there were several doctrines and
> > thought therefore that she was dodging the question and since he
> > had editing privileges the die was cast in favor of the stupid
> > one, the questioner.
>
> > On 09/01/2010 05:35 PM, Tommy News wrote:
> >> *Sarah Palin is working hard to divide this country further
> >> and to deride the President....now about religion...who believes
> >> in what, when. *
> >> *She failed her exams and attended six colleges before earning a
> >> Bachelor's in Journalism, failed as a beauty queen, she failed as
> >> a Mother, she failed as Governor of Alaska and resigned, she
> >> failed as McCain's running mate, and she failed countless ethics
> >> investigations.*
> >> **
> >> *Sarah Palin, the self proclaimed "Pitbull Momma Grizzley in
> >> Lipstick" is a falure. If she were President, now that she has
> >> learned what the "Bush Doctrine" is, she would start World War
> >> Three. *
>
> >> *Sarah Palin is an ignorant bitch. Her agenda is selfish and all
> >> about herself and her small, deluded world.*
>
> >> On 9/1/10, *Keith In Tampa* <keithinta...@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:keithinta...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >> And why is Sarah Palin an ignorant bitch Tom? What is it
> >> that you disagree with, that Sarah Palin stands for?
> >> Again, the floor is all yours.
>
> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Tommy News
> >> <tommysn...@gmail.com <mailto:tommysn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >> *I can see that this is not the group for me. It reminds
> >> me of another far LEFT and right wing extremist group,
> >> called The Political Spinroom, filled with personal
> >> insults, negativity, and childish dismissive attacks.*
> >> *Calling Rachel Maddow, a Rhodes Scholar, an "Ignorant
> >> Bitch" is offensive and insulting.*
> >> **
> >> *The ignorant bitch is Sarah Palin. *
>
> >> **
>
> >> On 9/1/10, *Keith In Tampa* <keithinta...@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:keithinta...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >> What an ignorant Bitch.
> >> I almost get sick to my stomach listening to the
> >> likes of Rachael "I Am Woman, I Am Husband" Maddow,
> >> Keith "I Wasn't Fired From ESPN, Really!" Olbermann,
> >> and Chris "I Got Another Tingle" Matthews. Three
> >> Anti-American Marxists who haven't a clue.
> >> The President's comments were offensive to all real
> >> Americans. What President Obama failed to mention,
> >> was that it was President Bush's surge that won this
> >> war. A surge that President Obama voted against as a
> >> Senator, and then voted not to fund, all the while
> >> campaigning that the "War Is Lost".
> >> Maddow hasn't a clue about what she is even talking
> >> about with Leftowitz and Bolton. Moreover, how does
> >> one place a price on the cost of defeating al Queada
> >> in Iraq? How does one place a price on getting rid
> >> of one of the worst dictators of the 20th Century,
> >> Saddam Hussein?
>
> >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tommy News
> >> <tommysn...@gmail.com <mailto:tommysn...@gmail.com>>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> Rachel Maddow remarks on President Obama's kind
> >> words for Bush and avoidance of criticism of the
> >> failed architects of the Iraq War.
> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/38944378#38944378
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a
> >> time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at
> >> Google Groups.
> >> For options & help see
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community at
> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in
> >> our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google
> >> Groups.
> >> For options & help see
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community at
> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our
> >> polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help see
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community at
> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help see
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment