Re: Just who we want to read in the op-eds

Are you say that Libby took the fall for others? No argument from me
there.... the question that I have for you is.... "If Libby fell on
his sword like a "good soldier".... WHAT DOES IT SAY FOR THOSE "ABOVE
HIM" THAT HE COVERED FOR?" Sorry for the caps. I did it by error but
it makes the point... So who was "worth" more than Libby.... Cheney ?
maybe worth the sacrifice... who else?
nominal9
On Sep 22, 5:57 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>      He lost his career.  He had to give up his law license and he
> really shouldn't have been charged with anything.   The FBI agent
> conveniently lost his notes from other people and when he testified
> could not back up anything he said with notes from the interviews.  
> Fitz then, even after being told not to bringup new subjects in his
> summing up did precisely that.   Two of the jury members should never
> have been seated.  They lied about their background, one of them even
> having worked directly for Tom Russert and taking notes to write stories
> about the jury decisions.   Tom Russert was the one whose testimony did
> the most damage to Libby and Tom Russert was one of those who the FBI
> agent lost his notes on.   Altogether the whole trial was a scam.
>
> On 09/22/2010 05:14 PM, nominal9 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Libby?... pay the price?.....Come on!.... I don't think he even got
> > Community Service.....
> > nominal9
>
> > On Sep 22, 3:46 pm, dick thompson<rhomp2...@earthlink.net>  wrote:
>
> >>       Totally agree.  And Armitrage should have been charged with what he
> >> did as well.   Instead Armitage gets off scot free and Libby has to pay
> >> the price for what he had nothing to do with.
>
> >> On 09/22/2010 02:27 PM, Keith In Tampa wrote:
>
> >>> I think it has been proven, time and time again, that Iraq /did/ go
> >>> uranium shopping in Niger.  That Joe Wilson is a typical partisan
> >>> hack, who did everything he could do to discredit the Bush
> >>> Administration.
> >>> Where the Bush Administration failed, was that they didn't expose
> >>> Wilson for the hack that he was.  He should have been charged with
> >>> treason.
>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, dick thompson
> >>> <rhomp2...@earthlink.net<mailto:rhomp2...@earthlink.net>>  wrote:
>
> >>>    http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/09/21/opinion/1248069063668/what-...
> >>>      <http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/09/21/opinion/1248069063668/what-...>
>
> >>>      --
> >>>      Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>      For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>      * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>>      <http://www.politicalforum.com/>    * It's active and moderated.
> >>>      Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news,
> >>>      and more.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> For options&  help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.