Re: Obama Destabilized the Middle East on Purpose

destabilization of the middle east has been a US goal since the 30's.

http://article.wn.com/view/2012/08/11/Pentagon_final_goal_is_to_destabilize_Middle_East_Journalist/


On Sep 17, 11:23 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  September 16, 2012 ****
> Obama Destabilized the Middle East on Purpose****
>
> *By* *Karin McQuillan* <http://www.americanthinker.com/karin_mcquillan/>****
>
> On Fox News Wednesday night, both Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity were full
> of self-congratulatory comments about how they had easily seen the Muslim
> Brotherhood problem with the "Arab Spring," and how could Obama have failed
> to see it? Duh. Of course, our State Department and White House knew that
> the Muslim Brotherhood would be taking over Egypt. It was obvious to any
> reasonably informed ordinary citizen.****
>
> The same debate we've seen over Obama's destruction of the American economy
> has already begun over his Middle East policy. Did Obama hand Egypt over to
> jihadis, and is he giving a green light to nuclear Iran, because of
> incompetence or his leftist ideology?****
>
> John Hinderacker over at
> Powerlineblog.com<http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/09/obamas-perverse-middle-...>writes:
> ****
>
> You could call his actions in the region incoherent, except that it's worse
> than that, especially if you take into account his hostility toward Israel.
> If a consistent principle can be deduced, it is that Obama wants to avoid
> doing anything that might advance U.S. interests. Maybe that's the answer,
> or maybe he just doesn't care enough to formulate a real policy. Be that as
> it may, one thing is clear: but for Obama's feckless participation in the
> overthrow of Egypt's and Libya's governments, yesterday's events would not
> have happened.****
>
> The answer, of course, is both incompetence and ideology. Muddle-headed
> ideologues of the left, such as our president, want America to be brought
> down to size. They truly believe that violent jihadi hate-groups can be
> tamed by appeasement, because the evil parties are Israel and America. So
> Obama helps depose Mubarak and Gaddafi, knowing they will be replaced by
> Islamic supremacists. He tells Israel they are on their own, we didn't
> really mean it about being allies. He blocks attempts to prevent a nuclear
> Iran, even by economic sanctions, because he doesn't like American shows of
> force and thinks we can live with a nuclear Iran. We lived with a nuclear
> Soviet Union, didn't we? Are we against Arabs, that we think they shouldn't
> have nuclear weapons, too? It sounds like a joke, but it isn't.****
>
> Incompetence was also in full force this 9/11. The attacks in Egypt and
> Libya were preventable. Why weren't our embassies and consulates in the
> Middle East properly protected? Why are fifty Marines sent in after the
> fact? Why didn't we have intelligence in advance? When the mob was
> gathering outside the Cairo embassy, the frightened staff issued an
> apology. What is wrong with our diplomatic corps if that was their
> response? Clinton should have gotten on the phone to the Muslim Brotherhood
> President Morsi and explained to him what would happen if he didn't protect
> our embassy. The rent-a-riot, inflamed purposefully by publicizing an
> obscure anti-Mohammed video, should have been stopped before they got
> anywhere close to our embassy.****
>
> When the embassy did issue their pathetic attempt at appeasement, and
> reissue it after our flag was torn down, Obama should have made a strong
> statement immediately, one that indicated that there are repercussions for
> attacking America. Instead, he allowed the apology to stand (for nine
> hours) until Romney condemned it. Desecrations of our flag didn't get the
> president's attention, but electoral politics did.****
>
> Obama's incompetence is an outgrowth of a broadly based Democrat ideology
> that wants us to believe that the war on terror was a stupid Bush idea.
> They accuse Republicans of exaggerating the jihadi threat. They smear any
> public figure who is concerned about the global Islamist war with the label
> "Islamophobe."****
>
> Obama, along with many liberal Democrats, believes that American strength
> is immoral. We shouldn't impose our views on other nations. So when the
> Muslim Brotherhood made its move last year, using the "Facebook revolution"
> as cover (and a very transparent cover it was), we abandoned Mubarak and
> told the Egyptian military to stand aside. We purposefully let the Middle
> East's oldest terror organization take over the Middle East's most populous
> country. ****
>
> The Muslim Brotherhood is considered the father of the jihadi
> movement<http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/why_we_should_fear_the_moslem....>.
> It was adopted by Adolf Hitler under the Third Reich and grew from a
> languishing 10,000 members to a million strong by the end of World War II
> -- Hitler's permanent
> legacy<http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/hitlers_long_shadow_over_israe...>for
> world destruction. Yet our president and State Department believe in
> embracing the Brothers as modernizing moderates.****
>
> The Brothers started the modern jihadi
> movement<http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/kategorie/32/?%3Emelded%20Naz...>,
> complete with a genocidal program against
> Jews<http://www.hmwatch.org/Sourcedocuments/wipeoutthejews.pdf>.
> In the words of Matthias
> Kuntzel<http://www.hmwatch.org/Sourcedocuments/MatthiasKuntzel.pdf>,
> "[t]he significance of the Brotherhood to Islamism is comparable to that of
> the Bolshevik Party to communism: It was and remains to this day the
> ideological reference point and organizational core for all later Islamist
> groups, including al-Qaeda and Hamas."****
>
> Mubarak was the reason there have been no attacks by Arab states on Israel
> for thirty years. The 1979 Camp David accords neutralized Egypt as a player
> in the Arab war against Israel. To protect his own life and power, Mubarak
> kept the Muslim Brothers of Egypt under control. In return, Egypt has been
> receiving a billion and a half dollars a year -- payoff money from the
> United States. Egypt didn't agree to a friendly peace, and it wasn't a
> democracy, but in terms of Middle East geopolitics, supporting Mubarak was
> a critical success factor.****
>
> Obama and Hillary threw all that away with their embrace of the Arab
> Spring. It could have gone differently. We could have spoken out in support
> of Mubarak, showing the world that we are trustworthy allies. Instead, we
> abandoned a crucial ally when the mob howled. We could have told the
> Egyptian military that they had better make sure the Muslim Brothers don't
> take over the country. Instead, we told them to step
> aside<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/egypt/...>and
> usher the Brothers into power.
> ****
>
> Hillary's State Department proclaimed that the Muslim Brothers had become
> moderates. Anyone having a flashback to the Carter era, when all the
> liberals knew that the Ayatollah Khomeini would be a partner for peace? ****
>
> The Obama Doctrine on the Middle East was hinted at in the president's 2009
> Cairo speech, during a Middle East tour in which Obama did not visit
> Israel. Obama apologized for our war on terror. "The fear and anger" after
> 9/11 "led us to act contrary to our ideals," he told the Egyptian crowd. In
> a speech in France, Obama declared that America must make deep cuts in our
> nuclear arsenal, because otherwise we don't have "the moral authority to
> say to Iran, don't develop a nuclear weapon." ****
>
> President Obama fought Congress tooth and nail on imposing economic
> sanctions against Iran this year -- already too little, too late. According
> to vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, the White House did everything
> they could to stop Congress from requiring sanctions, and then they used
> the waiver provision to gut them. There is no benign explanation for this.
> Left-wing anti-colonialists -- and our president is one -- think Iran will
> use its nuclear weapons responsibly.****
>
> One of the most chilling visuals in *2016: Obama's
> America*<http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/10/president-obamas-dangerous-dream-...>is
> a map of the world's nuclear arsenals. Obama has already cut our
> nuclear
> warhead arsenal from 5,000 to 1,500 (in an "arms treaty" that allowed
> Russia to increase its arsenal). He has asked the Pentagon to report to him
> on reducing our nuclear warheads to 300. That's about the same number as
> France. Pakistan has 110 nuclear weapons. Obama, it seems, believes in
> equality in national defense, as well as in class warfare. ****
>
> In July, five conservative congressmen, including Michele Bachmann,
> expressed alarm<http://bachmann.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=303218>over
> evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood has succeeded in placing
> operatives<http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/07/the-problem-with-michel...>in
> key positions throughout the Obama administration. In Bachman's words,
> State Department polices "appear to be a result of influence operations
> conducted by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim
> Brotherhood." Instead of backing up Bachmann, our Republican
> leadership<http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/312211/huma-abedin-s-muslim-br...>joined
> in Democrat attacks on her.
> ****
>
> The policies Bachmann
> listed<http://bachmann.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=303218>are
> not trivial. The Obama/Clinton team defied a congressional resolution
> to hold up our 1.5 billion dollars to Egypt until we knew they were still
> allies. Paying off Mubarak made sense. Handing billions to a Muslim
> Brotherhood Egypt, not so much. Do you think Egyptian President Morsi, the
> Muslim Brotherhood candidate, would have allowed a mob to attack our
> embassy if these funds were in play?****
>
> Congressman Bachman is
> concerned<http://bachmann.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ig_letter_dhs.pdf>,
> based on Frank Gaffney's analysis, that our Department of Homeland Security
> may have eight Muslim Brotherhood members in key advisory roles, including
> the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)'s Working Group, which is
> responsible for training homeland security agents. The CVE will be using
> federal Homeland Security funds to funnel money to Muslim Brotherhood
> organizations in the United States, in the name of a "community-oriented
> policing approach." The Homeland Security Office of Civil Rights and Civil
> Liberties has established the policy of protecting "terrorism-precursor
> activities" as "cultural behaviors."****
>
> Congressman Bachmann questioned why the DHS official lexicon equates jihadi
> extremists with "Christian patriots" and "Constitutionlists." She asked
> about Huma Abedin<http://frontpagemag.com/2012/frontpagemag-com/the-muslim-brotherhood-...>,
> Hillary's closest adviser at State, who formerly worked for a Brotherhood
> organization, founded and funded by Abdullah Naseef, who also finances
> al-Qaeda. There is no question that Abedin helps Clinton formulate U.S.
> Middle East policy.****
>
> The sorry list goes on and on. (For more details, see Frank
> Gaffney's<http://frontpagemag.com/2012/frontpagemag-com/the-muslim-brotherhood-...>"The
> Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration.")
> ****
>
> The point here is not only that the Muslim Brotherhood is influencing
> American foreign policy. The arrow points in both directions: the
> Obama/Clinton policy of tolerating and even promoting the power of the
> Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is the same policy that promotes their front
> groups in America. It is the liberal idiocy that our enemies are friends,
> and our friends enemies.****
>
> Obama has signaled clearly and repeatedly that America no longer has
> Israel's back. He could not have done anything more effective to sabotage
> negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians than his public pressure
> on Israel to declare unilaterally they will withdraw to their 1948 borders.
> Obama bypassed congressional limits on aid to the Palestinian Authority
> after their alliance with Hamas, putting $200 million into the hands of one
> of the most vicious and dangerous terror groups in the Middle East. And he
> has signaled to the Iranians that Israel is on its own. Then there are the
> personal but well-publicized snubs to the Israeli prime minister, and the
> open mike revelations of Obama's contempt and dislike for Bibi. Obama has
> time to go on the Letterman show in New York next week, but he refuses to
> meet with Netanyahu, as the go/no go decision on bombing Iran stares Israel
> in the face. ****
>
> Abandoning Israel invites war. But in Obama's mind, he is promoting
> fairness. He thinks Israel is the problem. He thinks that harming Israel
> will win America friends among Arabs. He thinks he is pressuring the
> Israelis to stop being bad guys. ****
>
> Obama is purposefully harming American interests, but he thinks it will
> turn out okay. He attacks the American economy and free-enterprise system,
> and he thinks it will turn out okay. He attacks our energy industry, and he
> thinks it will turn out okay. He attacks the rule of law and our
> Constitution, and he thinks it will turn out okay. He undermines the
> hard-won stability of Egypt and thinks it will turn out okay. We have a
> president who thinks American national security interests, power, and
> prosperity are the problem. Then, when it's a broken mess, he's surprised,
> and he asks for more time to do more of the same. Obama is the problem.****
>
> The Middle East is a harsh taskmaster. It is no place for an aging
> schoolboy leftist like our president. In the real world, stupid ideas such
> as the one dominant in Obama's administration, that jihadis really want
> peace -- such ideas have very bloody consequences. The tragic deaths of our
> diplomats in Libya are only the beginning. Iran looms over us all.****
>
> *Page Printed from:http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2012/09/obama_destabilized...<http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/obama_destabilized_the_middle_...>
> * at September 16, 2012 - 01:32:03 PM CDT****

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.