I truly do not know WHY ....
At 01:23 AM 8/19/2012, you wrote:
The pending lawsuit is unconstitutional, because "having no belief"
isn't a protected religion. Even if it were, the mere paying of some
of one's taxes to construct the 9/11 museum would not empower Atheists
to dictate anything to anyone. Yes, every "right" can have a
corresponding opposing right so long as the latter isn't a crime or
isn't disallowed by the present Constitution.
Natural rights are negative -- they require nothing on the part of others.
Rights have NOTHING to do with what some group decides is a 'crime' NOR what the Constitution allows/disallows.
All legitimate (natural) rights are derived from an Individual's right to life; his own life; self-ownership.
It is certainly IMMORAL as well as a violation of one's rights to have their money forcibly taken.
Legitimate Government SECURES (natural) rights <period>. A Government that does *anything* beyond such necessarily violates rights and is immoral -- no different from any other gang.
Regard$,
--MJ
There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him. -- Robert Heinlein
No comments:
Post a Comment