U.S. security threatened after CIA put 'out of business' of getting intel
from terror leaders, former CIA chief says
http://freebeacon.com/the-dark-knight/
BY: Bill Gertz - June 13, 2012 5:00 am
The Obama administration has taken the CIA "out of the business" of
interrogating high-value terrorists and the lack of data is endangering the
U.S. security, according to former CIA counterterrorism chief Jose A.
Rodriguez.
If U.S. intelligence or military personnel capture a senior terror leader
today, no system is in place or facilities set up where he could be
questioned, said the 31-year agency veteran who was awarded several medals
for his intelligence work before retiring in 2007.
"We are out of the business of doing that," he said of terrorist leader
interrogations in an interview with the Free Beacon. "We don't have anywhere
to take them. If you capture a high-value target outside the war zone, where
[are] you going to take them? They are not taking prisoners in Guantanamo,
[and] the black sites have been closed."
When U.S. special operations forces recently captured a terrorist in Sudan,
the only place he could be questioned was aboard a Navy ship at sea, he
said.
"So we don't have anywhere to take them, but even if we did, we are
restricted by the Army field manual, so we are basically out of the
interrogation business." The manual restricts all interrogations to tactics
outlined under international rules for questioning and treatment of
prisoners of war in conventional conflicts.
Rodriguez, author of the bestselling book Hard Measures, also said he and
fellow CIA colleagues were disgusted by President Obama's 2009 speech in
Cairo asserting that U.S. officials were guilty of torture for harshly
questioning terrorists.
On the current state of terrorist interrogations, Rodriguez said al Qaeda is
damaged but the CIA lacks current intelligence on the group that is needed
to prevent future attacks.
Since 2009, the Obama administration canceled presidential directives
allowing harsh interrogations, closed down covert CIA interrogation sites in
Europe and elsewhere, and sought to shut down the terrorist prison at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Additionally, current interrogation practices are
limited to those outlined in the Army field manual, such as requiring
captured prisoners to provide their name, rank, and serial number.
Now that details of harsh interrogation are known, terrorists who are
captured will be able to exploit their knowledge of the rules to avoid
giving up information, Rodriguez said.
"The problem is, of course, we've given away the playbook," he said. "We've
given away how far we can go legally interrogating, there are not many
options left."
If a new administration comes into office next year, "they are going to have
take this issue on and figure out what we can do" to gain intelligence from
captives, he said.
Rodriguez said he has not been in touch with the presidential campaign of
Gov. Mitt Romney, but knows several advisers, including another former CIA
counterterrorism chief Cofer Black, and former CIA Director Michael Hayden.
Some intelligence specialists have mentioned Rodriguez as a candidate for
CIA director if Romney wins in November.
On current CIA counterterrorism operations, Rodriguez said the CIA is
relying too much on drone strikes and expressed concerns that the policy of
killing but not capturing key terror leaders has led to a lack of
intelligence.
Armed Predator strikes play an important role in hitting terrorists hiding
out in remote locations, he said.
"The problem is that when you over-rely on the Predator, you miss out on the
intelligence," Rodriguez said. "We are still living off the intelligence
that was collected over the first eight or nine years of post-9/11."
"At some point, you are going to be needing information regarding the actual
status of al Qaeda, and what they are thinking, and what they are planning,
what their intentions are. So I think we're going to pay for this [lack of
intelligence] at some point."
Rodriguez expressed outrage over Obama's major speech to the Muslim world in
Cairo, Egypt June 4, 2009 when he said, "I have unequivocally prohibited the
use of torture by the United States."
"I was just disgusted to hear my own president basically saying those of us
who stepped up to the plate after 9/11 and went ahead and implemented
programs that were authorized and sanctioned by the U.S. government were
then being labeled as torturers by our president," Rodriguez told the Free
Beacon. "I just could not believe it, especially when all of this was
approved."
Equally upset were colleagues in the counterterrorism intelligence business
who took part in what became known as the enhanced interrogation program
designed to elicit information from captured al Qaeda leaders.
"That was the reaction of some of my friends that I worked with. The
feelings are shared by many people in the counterterrorism center who
participated in all of these [policies] thinking we had the full support and
the legality and the approvals from the White House to proceed."
At least 10 terrorist plots were preempted as a result of harsh
interrogations, Rodriguez said. They included an al Qaeda plan to conduct
hijacked plane attacks on the U.S. West Coast; planned terror strikes on
London's Heathrow Airport; planned attacks in Djibouti using water trunks
filled with explosives; and an attack planned against the U.S. Consulate in
Karachi.
Al Qaeda agents inside the United States were also uncovered as a result of
the interrogation program.
"I can tell you that interrogation of high-level detainees produced such
valuable intelligence, intelligence that allowed us to destroy the al Qaeda
organization that attacked us on 9/11," he said.
On other topics in Hard Measures, Rodriguez disclosed new details of the
shadow war on terrorism, including:
The CIA set up its own black site secret detention facilities to make
sure key detainees were not mistreated by contractors. "It is more than a
little ironic that the secret detention facilities that the CIA established,
at which we have been widely accused of abusing prisoners, were established
in part for the express purpose of making sure that these critical detainees
were not mistreated," he wrote.
A Muslim FBI agent tried to take control of CIA interrogations but was
rebuffed, and the Bureau pulled out of cooperation with the agency's
interrogation program in 2002. However, once valuable secrets were gained,
the FBI asked to be allowed back into the program but was turned down over
concerns it would compromise the locations.
One FBI agent tried to "turn" an al Qaeda leader into a Bureau informant
by offering him a Snickers candy bar. The terrorist, Abu Zubaydah, called
the agent a traitor and told him, "What makes you think I would turn my back
on Allah for money?"
Rodriguez personally led a team of CIA officials to brief senior House
leaders on CIA interrogation techniques and was surprised that Rep. Nancy
Pelosi falsely claimed she was never briefed on the program and told
reporters that the CIA routinely lied to Congress. "I couldn't believe it
that someone of that seniority in Congress making statements like that,
especially when I knew that not to be the case," Rodriguez said.
Videotapes obtained at the time of the capture of al Qaeda terrorist Abu
Zubaydah revealed that he had "been to Iran or was somehow cooperating with
the Iranians."
A corrupt Pakistani police officer learned of U.S. efforts to locate
terror mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Karachi and tipped him off
before he could be caught. He was eventually captured.
The CIA turned down a request from Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.) to be
waterboarded so he could see its effect because the agency feared he would
have a heart attack and die during the simulation.
Rodriguez defended his decision to destroy CIA interrogation videos in 2005
as legal and appropriate since the action protected CIA personnel in case
the videos leaked. Such a leak could have resulted in CIA officers being
hunted down by al Qaeda.
"The enhanced interrogation program was effective, legal, and protected
American lives," Rodriguez said in the interview. "I made the decision to
destroy to protect the people who work for me. And I'm very proud of the
work the agency did following 9/11 that allowed us to destroy the
organization that attacked us on 9/11. So I think it's a good story for the
agency."
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment