Re: NDAA 2012

American citizens, whether they are caught in the U.S.
or abroad, and are alleged to be connected to the al Queida or any
other
terrorist group, have the right to a court hearing
---
if detaining a citizen w/o a hearing is necessary to stop an attack
then so be it

On Jan 17, 11:01 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also point out, that Santorum did in fact understand the law of the land
> last night, and none of the other candidates, including Dr. Paul, did, or
> at least spoke correctly about the current law....It may have been a time
> limitation as to why they didn't clarify their knowledge of the law
>
> That is to say, that American citizens, whether they are caught in the U.S.
> or abroad, and are alleged to be connected to the al Queida or any other
> terrorist group, have the right to a court hearing.   Non-citizens do not
> enjoy that right, and can be held indefinitely.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I actually agreed with Dr. Paul on this issue last night during the
> > debate.  Until Dr. Paul put on his "Crazy Uncle Ron" persona, and started
> > talking about the Golden Rule in a combat zone,  he was winning the debate!
>
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:31 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> our authorities should have everything they need to catch the bad
> >> guys, including the ability to apprehend and detain threats as
> >> necessary, citizen or non-citizen
>
> >> On Jan 16, 7:51 pm, Daniel Seigler <danielseig...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Gentlemen,
>
> >> >     As you should know, President Obama signed into Law the National
> >> Defense Authorization Act of 2012 which contained language that would
> >> violate both the American sense of justice and the Constitutions of both
> >> Oregon (Article I, Sections 10, 12, 14, 22, 23, 27 as available on the
> >> Leg.state.ore website)  and the United States of America (Article I,
> >> Section 9, paragraph 2, Amendment IV, Amendment V, Amendment VI, and
> >> Amendment IX).
> >> >     According to WND.com's Bob Unruh, Representative Daniel P. Gordon
> >> Jr. of Rhode Island has proposed "a resolution to exempt his constituents
> >> from sections of the federal law."  And you are doing what to protect your
> >> constituents from an over-reaching Federal Government?
>
> >> > sign me
> >> > daniel karl seigler, born in Fort Benning, Cussetta County, Georgia,
> >> son of
> >> > Clarance Roland O'Neil Seigler, born in Ozark, Dale County, Alabama,
> >> son of
> >> > Thomas Malcolm Seigler, born somewhere in Alabama
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.