On Oct 10, 1:54 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The latest scam is a Bill to Congress by Obama that would supposedly
> stop discrimination by employers not hiring anyone out of work.
>
> #1. It would never pass in a Republican held Congress.
> #2. Employers are never going to state that's the reason they won't
> hire you.
> #3. They won't catch anyone, and is another wasteful spending measure.
>
> It's all politically motivated with no basis in logic.
> i.e. I've been out of work for 6 years now; I applied for a job that
> wanted 5 months experience and wrote them I had 35 times that
> experience and (knowing they wouldn't hire me) would consider dumbing
> myself down for the position.
>
> So what unemployed people need to do (and feel free to pass this on),
> is create their own "current" work history.
>
> i.e. I made my g/f (wife, mother, sister, friend, who ever can help
> you with this) assistant human resource manager for a known small
> legitimate company. Chances are the potential employer will have no
> idea who the Human Resources Manger is there.
> If any employers want to call her (some may, some won't), she will
> verify I am indeed gainfully employed by her company with no issues.
>
> In this time of political lies and deception by both major political
> parties, you have to do what they do; fabricate and lie.
>
> Obama knew *exactly* what the unemployment situation was when he came
> into office.
> But what did he do?
> Instead of address the problem from the start, he gave Health Care
> plan the priority (a plan that doesn't kick in for another 3 years
> anyway!), because when people are employed, they don't need his health
> care plan.
> So he waited, and waited, and waited to address employment... now
> making it a campaign issue, and not an actual job creating plan.
> All the while neither major political parties had zero plans to
> stimulate the real economy and create jobs.
>
> Why do you think Bush Jr. came up with a $700 billion bailout for Wall
> Street? And Obama continued the bailouts with half the money Bush Jr.
> didn't spend on them?
> Because both major political parties love the huge amounts of money
> that gets kicked back to them in the form of political campaign
> donations.
> Wall Street simply asks the politicians; which political party will
> give me the best deal for my donations?
>
> And you wonder why your bank fees go up?
> Don't be so ignorant.
>
> Wall Street kick-back donations far out-weigh donations given to them
> by all grass-roots ordinary people.
> Combine that with unions, big oil, telecoms, law firms, and other big
> business interests... and the common people have zero chance of having
> any of their real concerns addressed.
>
> By the people, for the people?
> If by "people" you mean "big business", then yes.
> Otherwise it's just meaningless words on a very old wrinkly piece of
> paper.
> Remember; the Supreme Court validated that money donated by big
> business is speech.
> That simply means anything you have to say about anything is
> worthless.
>
> And all of this because "the people" can't hold the leaders
> accountable for what a average 3rd grader is expected to accomplish in
> math class.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment