Al Qaeda: Never an “Existential Threat”

Al Qaeda: Never an "Existential Threat"
Posted by Gene Healy

My Washington Examiner column [1] this week celebrates 10 years without a major follow-up attack on American soil, and argues that the main reason the United States has been terror-free for a decade isn't the unparalleled competence of the federal government's terror warriors­it's the fact that al Qaeda was never an "existential threat."

I've written a number [2] of columns [3] and blogposts making the same point [4] over the years [5], and yet, every time I write something that says "al Qaeda's not so terrifying," I feel compelled to knock wood, genuflecting to the superstition that merely saying "we're pretty safe" out loud will jinx us, and the moment a piece is published, the terrorists will morph into villains worthy of TV's 24, moving from ineffectual gas-can bombs [6] to nukes.

So far, though, it seems there wasn't much reason to worry.

Last week, the Washington Post ran a piece entitled, "Who got 9/11 right, and who got it wrong? A pundit score card." [7] The Post erred badly by not including the distinguished political scientist and friend of Cato, John Mueller [8], who started making the case that the al Qaeda threat was overblown [9] back when duct tape alerts [10] were the "new normal." I can't think of any other prominent figure who got it right as early and as often as Mueller did.

As long as we're giving credit for prescience, though, I'd like to toot my own horn (sure, it's graceless, but nobody else is volunteering for the job).

As a larval pundit pecking away in obscurity through the early aughties, I suspected, before I'd ever read Mueller, that the al Qaeda threat was overblown -- and I made that case wherever I could.

In September 2002, I reviewed Peter Bergen's Holy War, Inc. [11] for Liberty magazine:  "Osama bin Laden: Not as Scary as You Think" (.pdf ) [12]. In it, I asked whether al Qaeda was "as dangerous as federal powergrabbers have led us to believe."

After recounting what Bergen reported about Mohamed Odeh, an al Qaeda operative involved in the 1998 bombing of the U.S. embassy in Tanzania­who botched his own escape by trying to convince Pakistani immigration officials that terrorism was "the right thing to do for Islam,"­I ventured that "a lot of these folks don't sound all that bright." (Since then, I've become even more convinced that these guys were never the sharpest scimitars in the shed [13].)

In December 2002, when my now-defunct blog was young and DC was waiting for the other shoe to drop [14] after 9/11, I wondered "What if There Isn't Another Shoe?": "If the American Jihad/mullahs under the bed/the-country-is-riddled-with-sleeper-cells theory is correct, then why so quiet?" I suggested: "maybe there aren't that many of them," which turned out to be true. (Here's a reference [15], and you can find the original if you go here [16] and scroll down.)

Ten years later, it's heartening to know that what was once a fringe position­and a marker of being "unserious" about terrorism -- is fast becoming [17] the conventional [18] wisdom [19].


http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/al-qaeda-never-an-existential-threat/

[1] http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/09/al-qaeda-was-never-existential-threat#ixzz1XndssQFT10
[2] http://washingtonexaminer.com/node/102096
[3] http://washingtonexaminer.com/node/62986
[4] http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/06/beware-depends-bomber
[5] http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/07/when-al-qaeda-defeated-can-we-have-our-liberties-back
[6] http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0504/Times-Square-bomber-joins-the-growing-list-of-inept-terrorists
[7] http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-got-911-right-and-who-got-it-wrong-a-pundit-score-card/2011/09/08/gIQAmppkFK_print.html
[8] http://www.cato-unbound.org/contributors/john-mueller/
[9] http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv27n3/v27n3-5.pdf
[10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duct_tape_alert
[11] http://www.amazon.com/Holy-War-Inc-Inside-Secret/dp/0743205022
[12] http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/files/printarchive/Liberty_Magazine_September_2002_0.pdf
[13] http://washingtonexaminer.com/node/62986
[14] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wait_for_the_other_shoe_to_drop
[15] http://www.highclearing.com/archivesuo/week_2002_12_08.html#003390
[16] http://genehealy.com/2002/12/page/2/
[17] http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/09/end-911-era/?utm_source=co2hog
[18] https://chronicle.com/article/article-content/128443/
[19] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/us/sept-11-reckoning/cost.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss