| The September 11 September and the redefinition of "conspiracy theory" after Orwellian pattern Paul Craig Roberts No sooner have we just not even paying attention, even the term "conspiracy theory" after Orwellian pattern redefined. Under "conspiracy theory" is understood no longer an event that can be explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it is now any explanation or even any fact meant that differs from the Declaration of the Government or its Medienlakaien. For example, Internet news broadcasts were from Russia Today on the New York Times equated with conspiracy theories, because RT reported news and commentary broadcast over the New York Times did not report and not the U.S. government approves. That means, in other words, if the truth for the government and its propaganda ministry is uncomfortable, it is simply a new conspiracy theory defines them as absurd and ridiculous statement, ignoring the best to discredit. Although carefully researched book stacks, released government documents and eyewitness testimony leave no doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald, President John F. Kennedy was not assassinated, they have been extensive research Government documents and statements wiped confirmed "as a" conspiracy theory aside. The truth about what had happened was so acceptable to the authorities and the Propaganda Ministry, which represents the interests of the authorities and the government could not. One of the clearest examples of how the American people the truth is withheld, concerns the reaction of the media (including many web pages) to the large number of experts who believe the official account of the events of 11 September do not agree with what they, as experts in physics, chemistry, civil engineering, architecture, fire, structural damage, driving and flying airplanes, the security measures of the United States, the possibilities of NORAD (North American Air and Space Defense Command), air traffic control, security measures at airports and other areas of knowledge. All of them were massacred in the media by fools, these experts denounced as "conspiracy theorists". This despite the fact that it is the official version that is supported by the media and distributed, is itself the strangest conspiracy theory of human history. Let us take a moment to give us the official story to recall, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory, although it is based on an amazing conspiracy. According to the official version has a handful of young Arab Muslims, who could not fly planes and mainly from Saudi Arabia and not from Iraq or Afghanistan came, not only the CIA but the FBI and all 16 American intelligence agencies, and all intelligence services U.S. allies - such as the Israeli Mossad, which is reputed, infiltrates all terrorist organizations and have carried out assassinations of individuals who are identified by him as a terrorist - tricked. But not enough, this small group of young people from Saudi Arabia, the tricked all intelligence the U.S. and its allies, also led the National Security Council, the U.S. State Department, NORAD, the security personnel at the airport even four times within the same hour on a morning and the air monitoring duped and then ensured that the American Air Force could launch any interceptors. And finally, they brought three sturdy steel construction, one of which had not even been hit by a plane, due to limited damage to buildings and relatively limited, short-lived fire at relatively low temperatures that affected only a few floors to collapse within a few seconds. Moreover, the Saudi terrorist in a position to set the basic physical laws repealed and the building number Seven World Trade Center a few seconds to let a long break at the speed of free fall, what without the use of explosives, as in controlled explosives are used, is actually physically impossible. The presentation, which seems to us the government and the media, dish, like a giant conspiracy, and could well serve as a template for a James Bond movie. But anyone who takes this unprovable conspiracy theory is in doubt, by the zealous media classified as meaningless or worse. Anyone who keeps the testimony of an architect, a civil engineer and demolition expert who said the videos showed that the buildings were blown up and not collapsed, to be true, anyone who disagree with a PhD physicist, who says that the official representation of the laws of Physics believes every one that expert pilots think who testified, no one who was not a pilot or an only slightly qualified pilot, could perform such maneuvers, everyone who believes the 100 people who helped the first site, who testified them into the towers not only explosions were heard, but they also witnessed personally, every one who believes the nano-chemist Niels Harrit of the Copenhagen University, of the finds of unconsumed nano-thermite materials in dust samples from the WTC towers reported, anyone who takes seriously the opinions of experts and not fall for the propaganda, is dismissed as cranks. In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world, real facts and accurate statements in the realm of the absurd have been banished. A writer or news editor is not even allowed on the results of research to tell people or groups that the official account of the events of 11 September are skeptical. The mere fact that you reported on the results of Professor Harrit is taken as proof that they approve of or agrees with them. Everyone who works for American media or the television knows that if he reported the results of Professor Harrit - and it was a joke - he or she is immediately fired. And although Harrit reported his results in the European television and in Canadian universities talks about it was, it was reported in American media, to my knowledge never notified that his international research team, and he proved unreacted nano-thermite materials in the WTC dust samples and other scientists had offered, take samples, they could also investigate. Even Internet pages, which I appreciate much else will not admit that I report on their sides on the results of Harrit. As I have explained elsewhere, I'm a journalist with the Huffington Post, corresponding to gain experience, who was very keen to interview a senior staff appointed by Reagan himself, the Republican with the wars in the Middle East did not agree. Having the interview that I conducted with him at his request, had published, he discovered to his horror, that I had reported on the results of critics of the official 9/11-Darstellung. As not to harm his career, he said in an online interview, the remark, my views should be ignored by the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, as I made unacceptable results for 9 / 11 public. The unwillingness or inability, through assessments of the events of 11 to report to September, which differ from the official account convicted, many Internet sites that the wars and the emergence of police-state domestic political situation facing rejection in the U.S., to impotence. These websites make themselves, for what ever reason, the government's version of events of the 11th September own while trying to resist the "war on terror" and the state police, who are the logical consequences, if one accepts the explanation of the government. It is an impossible balancing act to reject the consequences of an event whose explanation is accepted. If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists and possibly threaten more attacks in future, be a "war against terror" and domestic police-state measures, to ferret out the terrorists, is necessary in order to guarantee the safety of Americans. The idea that a police state at home and an endless war could pose a greater threat to America, then belongs to the illicit thoughts. A country whose population was led to the word of the government to accept uncritically, and to ostracize those who are in exactly the question, is a country without freedom in the future. |
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
No comments:
Post a Comment