probably THE most patriotic person in America, who has given 14 plus
years of my life to improving the lives of most Americans. You can't
say a negative word about me without showing yourself to be anti
capitalism and pro socialism-communism. If you are offended that I
don't recommend anarchy, you shouldn't fault my unselfish devotion to
doing what is best for the country. By the way, how did you ever get
so mad at government that you started advocating anarchy? — J. A.
Armistead —
>
On May 3, 11:59 am, Jonathan <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> To quote you: "MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in sounding negative
> to my efforts, as though in concert to defend... socialism and communism."
>
> You are nothing if not an Ass! I have NEVER defended socialism or
> communism in any reply to any post of yours relating to that
> piece-of-excrement you call YOUR New Constitution.
>
> On 05/02/2011 08:55 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The
> > Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful.
> > (Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has monkeys
> > in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international peace
> > negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of trying
> > to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you that
> > none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from my
> > New Constitution so that more and more people can understand what I
> > have done on their behalf to be "spam". If the only thing that
> > 'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what everyone
> > on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would tire of
> > reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are first-
> > time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New
> > Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the adjunct
> > block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There are
> > many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the lives
> > of average Americans better.
>
> > It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a fall-
> > from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group isn't
> > part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am sympathetic to
> > the computer storage problems associated with active posts. Several
> > months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in
> > sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to defend...
> > socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, because
> > those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding what I
> > was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would be
> > for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang
> > around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied
> > below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" tone
> > and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a
> > Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, if
> > Mark interferes again, with THE most important post in the history of
> > Political Forum.
>
> > John A. Armistead Patriot
>
> > [The following Email was received from The Annointed (sic) One,
> > today.]
>
> > Posting your thoughts and ideas is a wonderful thing. It is a JOY to
> > read every single posting every single day.
>
> > There has been a problem of late, though. The posting of three or four
> > original sentences that is followed by several paragraphs that are
> > simply cut and paste that can also be found numerous times throughout
> > that same thread and other threads as well is not what we do here.
>
> > Well,, thats SPAM !!! I have no problem reading the same material once
> > or twice but on some threads it is becoming ridiculously
> > repetitive..... when that action spreads to other threads and the
> > supposed posting either originates or answers in that (or those)
> > threads using the same cut and paste diatribe it is against our rules.
> > WE DO NOT ACCEPT SPAM from outside sources or from
> > members !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > So BASTA, GENUG, ENOUGH !!!! In the future said posts will be removed,
> > the explanation is here.
>
> > On May 1, 8:50 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> Dear J. Ashley: Since as little as one to four sentences are needed
> >> to address the crucial issues, there are NO paragraphs in my New
> >> Constitution! If there were, the entire document would require fifty
> >> plus pages, rather than just ten ledger-size pages to print. In many
> >> cases I have "highlighted" the answer to a specific comment by putting
> >> *** ... in front of the main point in the reply. The reason I show
> >> the entire BLOCK of text (but not a paragraph) is so that people can
> >> read larger sections and get a feel for how things are organized. The
> >> 160 words you counted probably addressed 10 or more separate issues.
> >> In some cases, my adding a single word modifier to an existing
> >> sentence allows going in an entire new direction. For example: In the
> >> 1st Amendment, I added the word "peaceable" to "freedom of *
> >> religion." That is a protection against any religion that advocates
> >> or condones violence as a means of fostering its objectives. J. A.
> >> Armistead
>
> >> On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> John,
> >>> I accomplished the same outcome with 43 words of clarity that you did
> >>> with your convoluted paragraph of more than 160 words.
> >>> On 04/24/2011 05:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>> J. Ashley: How quickly YOU forget! The following is from my New
> >>>> Constitution:
> >>>> "Section 9& 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person,
> >>>> news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
> >>>> government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
> >>>> while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
> >>>> make scheduled depositions provided they don t communicate with the
> >>>> representatives otherwise. A representative s constituents shall be
> >>>> allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
> >>>> only while they are in their home states or districts.
> >>>> Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
> >>>> return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
> >>>> constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
> >>>> accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
> >>>> solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
> >>>> solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
> >>>> organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
> >>>> prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
> >>>> above, is a felony defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
> >>>> prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed." John
> >>>> A. Armistead Patriot
> >>>> On Apr 22, 11:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> How quick you forget. Do you not remember when you challenged me once
> >>>>> before? I posted the following problem and solution:
> >>>>> (1) The lobbying of Members of Congress by any Person on behalf of
> >>>>> anyone other than themselves shall be prohibited.
> >>>>> (2) Any Person found guilty of lobbying under the Prohibitions of
> >>>>> this Article shall be imprisoned for not less than 10 Years and/or
> >>>>> deported;
> >>>>> On 04/21/2011 06:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>> J. Ashley: You never did define a single problem with our government
> >>>>>> or society, and solve that problem in less than four sentences. I did
> >>>>>> that for fourteen years! Convoluted or not, my New Constitution
> >>>>>> solves society's problems! J. A. A.
> >>>>>> On Apr 21, 12:06 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>> How does your reply have anything to do with what I posted? It's no
> >>>>>>> wonder YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted.
> >>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone
> >>>>>>>> stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes sense.
> >>>>>>>> But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>> 1) Trump has no ideology!
> >>>>>>>>> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists.
> >>>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If Trump
> >>>>>>>>>> was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's
> >>>>>>>>>> ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
> >>>>>>>>>> socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
> >>>>>>>>>> the head. J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> *John,
> >>>>>>>>>>> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
> >>>>>>>>>>> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
> >>>>>>>>>>> attention!*
> >>>>>>>>>>>http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp......
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
> >>>>>>>>>>>> post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can Donald Trump Fix the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. For one
> >>>>>>>>>>>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something like our broke economy
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall that a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> certain new ice skating rink in New York s Central Park started
> >>>>>>>>>>>> leaking water and couldn t be used. That work had been done by three
> >>>>>>>>>>>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
> >>>>>>>>>>>> before long.
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment