simply as words in sentences—are vague enough to leave the reader
wondering if the reply was being sarcastic, or if the writer is
actually agreeing with someone. Since I haven't read enough of your
replies to know your stand for sure, I hope we are both on the same
side. — J. A. Armistead —
On May 17, 10:46 pm, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 8:34 pm, Jonathan <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>
> > John,
>
> > Is that supposed to be some sort of defense for your utter arrogance?
>
> > On 05/17/2011 04:47 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > J. Ashley: By my New Constitution, patriotic Americans will TELL
> > > government that having maximum civil liberties (freedoms) is a
> > > requirement. At no point have I asked anyone for anything! In the
> > > most demonstrative ways possible, I tell (define) what government must
> > > do, or 'how high to jump' when the people speak! � John A. Armistead
> > > � Patriot
> > > On May 16, 5:40 pm, Jonathan<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > >> John's sheer arrogance rises to the surface once again! It seems no one
> > >> will ever be as good as John - at least in John's mind.
>
> > >> On 05/16/2011 01:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > >>> You will never best me at anything, MJ, because you
> > >>> simply don't measure up.
> > >> --
>
> > >> Freedom is always illegal!
>
> > >> When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> > >> declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> > >> have any possibility of being free.
>
> > >> "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological
> > >> refuge of unthinking patriotism?"
> > >> Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University
>
> > --
>
> > Freedom is always illegal!
>
> > When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we
> > declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we
> > have any possibility of being free.
> > *************************************************************************** ******
> > "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological
> > refuge of unthinking patriotism?"
> > Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University-
>
> Another liberal imbecility! He should have aptly
> said..... "Why should we bother with "realities" when we have the
> ideological refuge of mindless socialism?" To which; all liberal self
> proclaimed " intelligentsia " have devoted their lives to.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Gary Leupp- Professor of Herstory, Tufts University-
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment