"creativity" in history. In fact, history (other than time-line) is a
course which should not be taught in public schools! Glenn Beck not
withstanding! — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 21, 9:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way Einstein you have yet to tell me just exactly what if anything
> you have that supports your position against Gaddafi ?? What has he done
> that is a clear and present danger to the US ??
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> > > John,
>
> > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than
> > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much
> > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> > Patriot
> > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> John,
>
> > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > should
> > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even
> > ask
> > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5%
> > are
> > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead
> > �
> > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> John,
> > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites
> > based
> > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > expression means.
> > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm
> > to the
> > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull
> > off this
> > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.
> > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are
> > very
> > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from
> > the
> > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > moderation
> > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > killed?
> > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > kill
> > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has
> > caused
> > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person
> > who
> > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government
> > and
> > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > arrested,
> > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution
> > for
> > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's
> > viewed
> > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you
> > are so
> > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some
> > couch-
> > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > present, or
> > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the
> > standard
> > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US
> > law.
> > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > "reasoning" in
> > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why
> > Jews
> > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be
> > such
> > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for
> > successful
> > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds
> > Muslims
> > > >>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that
> > the USA
> > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?)
> > saying
> > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my
> > New
> > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.
> > If you
> > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > saying,
> > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > Constitution has
> > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.
> > The last
> > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > heads
> > > >>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for
> > the 85%
> > > >>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become
> > available.
> > > >>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as
> > part of
> > > >>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why
> > this
> > > >>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed
> > things
> > > >>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A.
> > Armistead �
> > > >>>>>>>>> Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hey John!
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan,
> > Mark and MJ are
> > > >>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and
> > one of them
> > > >>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack
> > Literal Truth might
> > > >>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next
> > missive!
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<
> > noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our
> > political-governmental
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic
> > resources,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and
> > fix-up. The
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more
> > fortunes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.
> > By adapting
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be
> > assured! � John
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest
> > Distance;
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm
> > thrilled that
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a
> > cure for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book
> > explains
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple
> > things can
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving
> > conducting...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know
> > what I am
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an
> > open
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment