Re: Why in the world would the NYT print this story - why not just point a finger at the CIA agents and tell the Libyans there they are

We are on the same page.

"A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment."

Ya think? Its called SSS. Sargent Schultz Syndrome.

On Apr 1, 2:37 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Not any more.  Question is should it have been in the first place.  Next
> question is who leaked it to the NYT and why and who told them to, who
> is behind the leak at the ultimate end.  I just find it strange that the
> NYT feels entitled to release anything like this with what was said
> about it to begin with.  If it was secret, if it was clandestine, if it
> was authorized for the CIA to act, then it should not be up to the NYT
> to decide to print the info.
>
> On 04/01/2011 11:20 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that the president has issued a secret finding - authorize the
> > CIA - clandestine effort.  What part of that tells us that the
> > president
> > wants this broadcast to the world.  Note the word secret, CIA,
> > clandestine.  Which of those words do you not understand.
> > -------------------------------------
>
> > If you're reading about it in the New York Times, its neither
> > clandestine nor secret.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.