'Golden Rule': "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
And no prudent person has trouble knowing what is fair. In the case
of contract law, a FAIR contract is one in which both parties to the
contract are happy with the deal. If a person thinks they have been
treated unfairly by government or by business they can sue in civil
court and let the jury decide. Those with a conscience (but not you)
know, instinctively, when they are being fair to others. No one needs
to go to any czar to see what the God-damned government has to say!
Give up your hobby of replying on Political Forum. You don't have the
reasoning ability of a (blind) mole. — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 24, 2:40 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> Are you serious? "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!"
>
> Who decides what is "fair play"? You? Mob rule?
>
> "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting to decide what's for lunch."
>
> On 03/24/2011 09:36 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Jonathan: If you had spent 14 years of your life writing a New
> > Constitution for the benefit of most Americans, you'd realize that
> > "ego" just wouldn't be a suitable enough motive. Apparently, I pegged
> > you right that you are simply jealous that I have already accomplished
> > things you've only talked about. Conservatives such as Glenn Beck and
> > Rush Limbaugh like to talk about this country's problems, but can't be
> > taken seriously that they actually want those problems to be solved.
> > Judge Andrew Napolitano has close to the right assessments of the
> > unconstitutionality of much that the WH is doing. But he always grins
> > and stops short of calling for the immediate arrest of Barack Obama
> > for TREASON. My New Constitution will hang any public official not
> > upholding this simple sworn statement: "Fair play and democracy shall
> > have supremacy in the USA!" Since socialism and communism are the
> > anti-theses of fair play and of democracy, I highly recommend that no
> > socialist-communist-minded air-heads ever seek public office. If they
> > do, there could become a shortage of hangman's nooses! � John A.
> > Armistead � Patriot
> > On Mar 23, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> It always comes back to John's ego: "I suspect you can't see the
> >> positive tone, because you are jealous of my commitment and talent to
> >> accomplish what I have."
>
> >> On 03/23/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Dear Mark: Should I be flattered that you remember what I say from
> >>> one day to the next? If indeed you can read and comprehend, you
> >>> wouldn't need to put those words in capitals. Unlike you and MJ, I
> >>> don't depend on YELLING to make my points. If you find what I'm
> >>> writing to be interesting enough to read every day, then you are
> >>> either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened and
> >>> thus opposed. The "tone" of my document is pro control of government
> >>> by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use
> >>> of tax dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the
> >>> rights of others. I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because
> >>> you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I
> >>> have. If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution.
> >>> If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts. No
> >>> socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA! � John A. Armistead �
> >>> Patriot
> >>> On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is that
> >>>> we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND.
> >>>> The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next
> >>>> what he says.
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending
> >>>>> it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are
> >>>>> the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New
> >>>>> Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or
> >>>>> hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you
> >>>>> attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> >>>>> THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get
> >>>>> lost, Jonathan! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:
> >>>>> I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> >>>>> Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatized�while continuing to "cover" only
> >>>>> those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of
> >>>>> getting first rate care.
> >>>>> The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see
> >>>>> his EMBRACE of socialism.
> >>>>> There is ALSO this from the same person:
> >>>>> Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type
> >>>>> and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive
> >>>>> new developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction,
> >>>>> nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to maintain
> >>>>> continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type.
> >>>>> Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform safe
> >>>>> and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be
> >>>>> sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing
> >>>>> jurisdiction�beyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory
> >>>>> board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry
> >>>>> regulated.
> >>>>> Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> >>>>> It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully
> >>>>> presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.<sigh>
> >>>>> Sad.
> >>>>> As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE
> >>>>> examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you
> >>>>> refuse to present and merey proclaim.
> >>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>> --MJ
> >>>>> Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It
> >>>>> has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside
> >>>>> and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or
> >>>>> contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual
> >>>>> process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as
> >>>>> a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power
> >>>>> in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
> >>>>> At 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:
> >>>>> MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about
> >>>>> the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference
> >>>>> a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private
> >>>>> property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! � John
> >>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ<micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You
> >>>>>> aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably
> >>>>>> doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas
> >>>>>> and I the converse.
> >>>>>> It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see
> >>>>> how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a foundation.
> >>>>>> Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private
> >>>>> property without outside interference.
> >>>>>> Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention.
> >>>>>> Regard$,
> >>>>>> --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy
> >>>>> when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately
> >>>>> become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me say
> >>>>> something like this: "I
> >>>>>> applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient
> >>>>>> government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career
> >>>>>> politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good
> >>>>>> luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country!
> >>>>>> � J. A. Armistead �
> >>>>>> On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>> eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000
> >>>>> transactions
> >>>>>>> are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for
> >>>>>>> government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they are
> >>>>>>> happy with the transaction 96% of the time.
> >>>>>>> There is no need for government involvement in commerce.
> >>>>>>> On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative
> >>>>>>>> republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties
> >>>>>>>> to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who
> >>>>>>>> support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution
> >>>>>>>> with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro
> >>>>> capitalism
> >>>>>>>> and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan!
> >>>>> �
> >>>>>>>> J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a
> >>>>> free
> >>>>>>>>> sovereign, I do not consent.
> >>>>>>>>> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference,
> >>>>> 96%
> >>>>>>>>> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise as
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>> gets.
> >>>>>>>>> On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free enterprise.
> >>>>>>>>>> So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent on
> >>>>> tearing
> >>>>>>>>>> down this country rather than saving it. He should be railroaded
> >>>>> out
> >>>>>>>>>> of the USA! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again!
> >>>>>>>>>>> He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw political
> >>>>> parties.
> >>>>>>>>>>> He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has "the
> >>>>> smarts
> >>>>>>>>>>> and the temperament to be President."
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace get hot-under-the-collar if a
> >>>>> "guest",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> like Sarah Palin, avoids answering questions that tie her hands
> >>>>> on
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment