lake is leaking, rapidly. And with that leak, the pressure is
falling! — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 28, 1:04 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Einstein.... One there is no bridge here that is high enough and
> B. there are no icy waters any time of the year.... Geographically
> challenged as well I see........and 3. you can't tie a concrete block
> to a ball of slime...just won't work.
>
> You metaphors/similes (or whatever they are) are just as poorly
> thought out as your "New Constitution".
>
> With all that you include in your Constitution that is prohibitive and
> answerable to the state.... it is indeed
>
> "STALINESQUE"
>
> On Mar 28, 8:41 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Mark: Glenn Beck says he employs eight people to produce his TV
> > show. But the liberal media which attacks him employs 40 or so. You
> > are a socialist-communist of the worst order (worthy of being HANGED
> > for treason) for trying to peg my for-the-people New Constitution
> > Stalinesque! You are attacking me for doing things diametrically
> > opposed to your God-damned liberal ideals. Do the world a favor,
> > slime-ball, tie a concrete block to your feet and jump off the nearest
> > bridge into icy waters. People will rejoice at your passing—the only
> > acclaim you'll ever get in your miserable life! — John A. Armistead
> > — Patriot
>
> > On Mar 25, 3:01 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Not to defend MJ or anything of the sort but to say this:
>
> > > Those
> > > WITH enough IQ surely must realize that my New Constitution is the
> > > strongest and most people-oriented document ever written!
>
> > > Is so Stalinesque that it is hilarious. You write that and call someone else
> > > an idiot ??
>
> > > If by disagreeing with you (or anything else for that matter) is cause in
> > > your little mind to say that someone is un-American then you really need a
> > > little (or a lot) of "rest" (accompanied by some gentle but consuming
> > > drugs).
>
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > Dear MJ, the socialist-communist, party-crashing jerk: You have an IQ
> > > > problem, evident in your continued YELLING of the words of others,
> > > > while having nothing worthy to say, yourself. From day one, you have
> > > > been rude to attack even the fringes of anything I say or do. Those
> > > > WITH enough IQ surely must realize that my New Constitution is the
> > > > strongest and most people-oriented document ever written! If, like
> > > > you say, you are... "interested" (very weak compared to MOTIVATED)
> > > > toward returning America to liberty and freedom, you would be praising
> > > > everything I am doing for the benefit of hard-working Americans. Your
> > > > TONE is clearly one of opposition to me. That fact is proof positive
> > > > that you are a fraud who is undeserving of being called an American!
> > > > — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Mar 24, 12:17 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > And yet you continue to reply -- spewing fallacy -- while pretending NOT
> > > > to reply.
> > > > > In reality, I am interested in returning America to liberty and freedom.
> > > > What is obvious, however, are your Orwellian efforts.
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual
> > > > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
> > > > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient
> > > > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
> > > > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its
> > > > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and
> > > > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 12:07 PM
> > > > 3/24/2011, you wrote:MJ, the party crasher, is bent on destroying, not
> > > > saving the USA. So,
> > > > > that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. —
> > > > > J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > On Mar 22, 6:43 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > And yet you AGAIN provide a response.
> > > > > > You will be hard-pressed to PROVE your silly assertion that I am
> > > > somehow a "deranged, socialist-communist" ... but I suggest you do so.
> > > > > > There is a pattern here ... you provide absurd claims/assertions ...
> > > > others 'call' you on it -- usually requesting substantiation ... you pitch a
> > > > fit and spew fallacy while calling names.
> > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual
> > > > legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
> > > > many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient
> > > > facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
> > > > intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its
> > > > enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and
> > > > using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:38 PM
> > > > 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ, the deranged, socialist-communist, party crasher is
> > > > undeserving of
> > > > > > being replied to. — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > On Mar 22, 12:57 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >Folks: Apparently, MJ is incapable of reasoning. He supposes that
> > > > > > > >since my "ideal" (not mandated in my New Constitution) government
> > > > > > > >would have ZERO outlays to individual citizens, i.e., no SS,
> > > > Medicare,
> > > > > > > >Medicaid, nor Unemployment, that that shows me to be a socialist.
> > > > Can
> > > > > > > >you believe it?!
>
> > > > > > > <sigh>
> > > > > > > How a Government programs the STEALS from person
> > > > > > > A in order to give to person B will be
> > > > > > > 'privatized' not being provided notwithstanding,
> > > > > > > the portion that continues to embrace socialism,
> > > > > > > of course, was "while continuing to "cover" only
> > > > > > > those older or sicker people who have no other
> > > > > > > means of surviving or of getting first rate
> > > > > > > care". Like the woman who finally agrees on her
> > > > > > > price being a 'prostitute', so too is yours an embrace of socialism.
>
> > > > > > > Sad isn't it, that Armistead is reduced to
> > > > > > > projecting his shortcomings onto others.
>
> > > > > > > It is also noted that you AVOIDED the second
> > > > > > > example (like the misdirection you attempt on the
> > > > > > > first) of your socialist tendencies.
>
> > > > > > > >Socialism and communism (the ideal of Barack Obama)
> > > > > > > >have government providing everything and controlling everything.
>
> > > > > > > Government 'providing' everything is not required
> > > > > > > for socialism's myriad of children.
>
> > > > > > > > I want government to provide next to nothing and to control next
> > > > to
> > > > > > > >nothing.
>
> > > > > > > Except what excerpts of your Constitution you
> > > > > > > have provided does not bolster such a claim.
>
> > > > > > > > A properly functioning free enterprise system can do those
> > > > > > > >thing, AND allow the maximum FAIR prosperity for the maximum number
> > > > of
> > > > > > > >Americans!
>
> > > > > > > And yet your own brand of utopian socialism raises its head again.
>
> > > > > > > >MJ is revealing himself to be a socialist-communist bent on
> > > > retarding
> > > > > > > >my efforts to promote my New Constitution. He and Jonathan Ashley
> > > > > > > >aren't wanting to save the USA, but to have the USA fail. A person
> > > > > > > >can be either FOR me or AGAINST me. 100% of those who are against
> > > > me
> > > > > > > >are criminal, socialist-communists like OUTLAW Barack Obama. — John
>
> > > > > > > Your fantasies and fallacies may aid you in
> > > > > > > retaining that pleasing vision, but they do little to those who grasp
> > > > reality.
>
> > > > > > > I certainly understand your need to pretend your
> > > > > > > embraces of socialism are really not. I can also
> > > > > > > understand your desire for baseless
> > > > > > > 'name-calling'. I am quite certain that OTHERS do as well.
>
> > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > > > Nothing in the world is more dangerous than
> > > > > > > sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther
> > > > King, Jr
>
> > > > > > > >A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > >On Mar 21, 10:26 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and
> > > > > > > > communism are the anti-thesis of a
> > > > > > > > representative republic or a democracy. My New
> > > > > > > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the
> > > > > > > > People and will fire, jail or hang those in
> > > > > > > > government who support socialism and
> > > > > > > > communism. When you attack my New Constitution
> > > > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> > > > > > > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties
> > > > > > > > person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J.
> > > > > > > > A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same
> > > > > > > > person:I am personally recommending that Social
> > > > > > > > Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment
> > > > > > > > Insurance ALL be privatized—while continuing to
> > > > > > > > "cover" only those older or sicker people who
> > > > > > > > have no other means of surviving or of getting
> > > > > > > > first rate care. The implications are rather
> > > > > > > > OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of
> > > > socialism.
> > > > > > > > > There is ALSO this from the same
> > > > > > > > person:Businesses or professions meeting
> > > > > > > > licensing standards germane to the type and
> > > > > > > > scope of work such perform, and being regularly
> > > > > > > > apprised of substantive new developments, may
> > > > > > > > control their own work without governmental
> > > > > > > > sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to
> > > > > > > > be other than self-trained to maintain
> > > > > > > > continuing competency
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment