<Grin>!
Guten Abend John!
Uhm....I will admit that on occasion, I might take some literary license here and there, on message boards such as Political Forum as well as in e-mails, but in general, I will match my command of the Queen's English with yours...As well as my knowledge of history, ideological thought, prespective and understanding. Most especially, I will match my knowledge and understanding of substantive and common law with yours...Any day of the week, any hour of the day!
Mark "The Annointed One" Kahle? Mark is a closet conservative, who sometimes gets confused! <Grin Again>! MJ & Jonathan? Both conservative libertarians who border on anarchy. All of which are thoughtful, intelligent folks, and who basically have called you on the carpet. That is one of the great things about this once large, but dwindling group. You cannot talk a good game in here, you must actually back up and support your rhetoric! You Sir, were confronted several times with legitimate questions, of which you could not answer, by the likes of Jonathan, MJ and Mark.
I enjoy ya John! I think you bring up some rather interesting points and propositions, but the three guys who you continue to talk smack to, and all who have asked you in general, one question that you seem to dodge and don't want to address; (and I am paraphrasing here) : "How Do You Expect To Get Your New Constitution Ratified, If No One Is Allowed To Read It And Discuss Its Merits?"
For two months now, and after over three hundred messages, in at least five or six different threads, all captioned similarly,,,Something to do with "Wringing The Necks Of Empty Rituals"; we've watched you dance and dodge legitimate questions while simultaneously poking and prodding your questioners; all the while, Jonathan's and Michael's "Signature Quotes" continued to get larger, bigger, and longer!
It's been fun, but let's move on!
Humbly,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:49 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Dear Keith: In the USA we have the right to self defense. If, in
defending myself, I must use the same bullets to dispatch those bent
on doing me, or others in this country harm, no one can declare
otherwise. I know that Mark is a God-damned liberal. And you could
well be a wolf in sheep's clothing. I sincerely doubt that a person
with a Doctor of Law Degree would be content to co-moderate anything
with the likes of Mark. Also, your use of the English language falls
below that of most lawyers. Google is largely controlled by
liberals. When my New Constitution starts being so viciously attacked
by liberals, that is proof that my document is accomplishing its
intended purpose: "Returning control of government to the People; and
removing all controlling influences by biased groups." If my
accomplishing those ends upsets you, that is your problem, not mine.
I wasn't put on this Earth for recreational bantering with mental
lightweights on any subject. Learn or leave, that is the readers'
option on MY original posts! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>> you look at PoliticalForum's Rules & Guidelines, which can be found here:http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/web/political-forum-dec...
On Mar 28, 12:02 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guten Abend from Köln, John,
>
> You are incorrect in your assessment. Yes, PoliticalForum is moderated. As
> a matter of fact, you have been warned by Mark "The Annointed One"
> Kahle, who co-moderates PoliticalForum with me, that your continuous
> "Spam", (and if you don't know the definition of "Spam"; I suggest that
> ) should cease. By that, I mean that today, you have submitted three
> messages within seven minutes, and countless other messages for the past
> month that are identical....Something to the effect of: "MJ, The Party
> Crasher", YadaYadaYada..."
>
> We get it. We got it three weeks ago. You don't want to post your "New
> Constitution"; you don't want to address those individuals who have posed
> legitimate questions regarding the content of your New Constitution, and
> you consider any criticism to your proposed "New Constitution" spurious.
>
> There is a gamut of issues, events, scenarios, assholes, theologies,
> considerations, and baseball that could be discussed, and that we would
> love to hear your opinion on. Shit can the canned responses.
>
> By the same token, all of ya'll who have these lovely, quippy signatures,
> that are usually longer than whatever it is that you are posting, are also
> getting a bit stale. Just as important, wiping the previous embedded text
> in the message that you are writing, saves a lot of time when scrolling and
> trying to find the newest post in the thread.
>
> Thanks for all of your consideration!
>
> KeithInKöln
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment