On 01/29/2011 04:24 PM, Keith In Köln wrote:
This is shameful. Isn't the Boston Globe still owned by the NYT Company? I recall just recently that it was purchased by another private consortium.....Obviously, if this is the case, they have not changed the editorial board.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
If I were on the SCOTUS I would have skipped this mess also. Why should they sit there as targets for whatever ruffled Junior's feelings this time. His speech was very missable in the first place and by staying away they did not lose anything at all that was of any value. And why the Globe thought that their staying away brought politics to the court when sitting there while Zero lied about the court decision last year didn't bring politics to the court? I think the Globe is doing nothing but pushing their own agenda for no good reason at all.
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/01/27/by_skipping_obama_speech_justices_bring_politics_to_court/
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment