DADT could have3 been repealed by executive order by Clinton or by Obama years ago
-- They kept in in place because
1) they didn't want to spend any political capital on the issue because they weren't committed to it except for lip service
and
2) they wanted to keep gay people as 2nd class citizen so they could use them as a w
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:14 PM, studio <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote:
The great thing about this was that it doesn't cost a dime to
implement.
And in fact saves about $193 million in enforcement, replacement,
administrative and court costs.
But for Repblitards, costs are never an issue when it comes to the
"morally right thing" to do... which is prosecute as many people, for
as many different things as they can.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment