Over fourteen years ago, when I first began writing my 'New
Constitution of the United States of America', I wasn't interested so
much in "writing laws", myself, as I was is making sure that the
People are once again in charge of the government that is supposedly
governing us. Following the election of the Anti-Christ, Barack
Obama, as President—correction, PSEUDO-President—it has become
strikingly clear that Democrats (Yes, all of them!) suppose that their
'winning the 2008 election' entitles them to change the USA from a
Representation Republic into a SOCIALIST nation without so much as an
Amendment to our Constitution.
If invading troops landed on our shores hell-bent on destroying our
Representative Republic, our retaliation would be swift and deadly.
But when our elected officials, acting under our supposedly flawless
Constitution, start destroying the form of government that the
Founding Fathers considered to be best for us, there is mostly apathy
all across America. The likely reason for the apathy is because
People are tired of hearing so many arguments for this or against
that. They are content to let others, who are more eloquent than they
are, do the arguing. For every save-the-USA "convert" by the likes of
Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, there are ten or more people who 'zone-
out' and feel satisfied that the right things are being talked about…
all-be-it by others. There are just too many topics of discussion for
the Joe Blows of America to feel that they can affect the needed
changes. Or so it seems.
A WEB site, wikileaks, has released thousands of US secret documents
to aid our enemies and endanger our troops. Rightfully, some of us
peg that as treasonable offenses. But when our illegitimate President
begins empowering czars to bypass the authority of Congress;
disregards the US Constitution that he swore to uphold, but fails,
daily, to uphold; orchestrates the total destruction of our free-
enterprise, Capitalist economic system; and indebts generations of
Americans to pay for programs which they have never agreed with, where
are the arresting officers charging TREASON?
"The Obama presidency is like graffiti on the wall of American
History!" The Obama presidency (sic) is, also, like a CANCER that
must be cut-out in order for the USA to survive! The bloodless CURE
for that cancer is the arrest, trial and hanging of every single
elected Democrat or cross-over Republican who has disregarded the
macro will of the American People and voted for anything, such as
Obama Care, that is economy-destroying and socialist. Wearing custom
tailored suits, power ties, and having offices in the Capital or its
annexes does not excuse any elected official from being charged with
TREASON! Those who are orchestrating the stealing of trillions of
dollars of money from the American People, by COUNTERFEITING money,
are OUTLAWS, in the frontier-justice sense of that word. Conversely,
those who fight to save the USA, economically or otherwise, are
heroes, not criminals!
At Fox News about 75% of the newscasters are liberals, who "smile"
inappropriately whenever there is a 'spin' favorable to Democrats.
Greta Van Susteren has been rejoicing ever since Harry Reid got… re
elected. She remarked how good it will be when unemployment drops so
that… "the tax base will increase." She, like most extreme leftists,
thinks things are best when government controls everything. Folks, if
you disagree with having government control everything, you should
start talking about having my New Constitution be ratified! Since
socialism isn't fair, nor is such an ideal of democracy, my New
Constitution will BAN allowing anyone to use the public airways to
tout things that are so Anti-American! "Fair and Balanced" will not
be allowed, if the "balanced" side is having any GET-rather-than-
produce liberal be allowed to preach government determination rather
than self-determination—the ideal of the Founding Fathers.
In the last two weeks there has been (only) a 1% drop in the number of
liberals who consider Obama to be doing OK as President. 100% of the
39%, who so stated, are wanting to GET at least something from
government even if that means the USA will be destroyed,
economically. Probably, 75% of those people are actually self-
supporting, but not to a degree that would prevent them from… hating
the 'rich'. They continue to be mass-minded in their thinking and to
vote, as a block, so that the remaining 25% of the 39% (about 10% of
our population) won't have to… go without. In short, the 10% who
won't support themselves in any wise are destroying the USA. But that
is OK with Blacks, labor unions, younger women, and the perennially
lazy students in our worthless universities. Like games of equally-
worthless… basketball, this is about winning or loosing, not about
doing what is best for the USA and for generations of Americans.
Though the following aren't mandated in any portion of my New
Constitution, these are the only steps I see that will come even close
to being FAIR in correcting our broke, broke government—that
definitely needs fixing: (1.) As soon as possible, downsize Federal
and State governments to 25% of the present in terms of the numbers of
those employed, and the outlay of money; (2.) Remove all taxation
and the associated record-keeping and restrictions on businesses
operating on principles of fairness and public safety; (3.) Close
down all liberal news media promoting socialist notions; (4.) Bring
home US military forces except about 10% to be a defensive perimeter;
(5.) Drastically cut back on the "scope" of public education, to end
at age 16; (6.) Lower the child labor age to 13; (7.) Define an
"adult" as any person 16 or over who is self-supporting. (8.) Stop
all pensions or other outlays of money to able-bodied Americans, but…
(9.) Continue to pay "Social Security" and "Medicare" to all seniors
who can not work; (10.) Close all redundant bureaucracies, such as
the Department of Education; (11.) Other than for the Office of
Homeland Security and some aspects of the FBI and the Secret Service,
remove all records on non-violent, law-abiding citizens; (12.)
Arrest, try and hang for TREASON any public official—Federal, State or
Local—who doesn't abide by this oath: "Fair play and democracy shall
have supremacy in America!" (13.) Criminalize lobbying, or any "group
power" organization desiring more influence on government than one-
person-one-vote; (14.) Outlaw political parties and the use of the
American Flag as a backdrop for those who suppose they are 'important'
public officials.
The HUGE upside of the above austere downsizing of government is that
those who had worked for government producing "goods or services" that
no one would wish to buy, will now become employed producing desired
goods and services. Encouraging our kids to start working, earlier,
will create both demand for goods and a new supply. As the
productivity per person, over their lifetimes, goes up, so too will be
their standards of living. And since there will be a 75% reduction in
the money being wasted on… governments, the money available for people
to be 'charitable' close to home will mean that practically no one
will be trying to get a government to pay for anything! *** The ideal
is to have governments function with next to ZERO interaction with the
individual citizens. There should NEVER be a BIG BROTHER looking over
anyone's shoulder!
The socialist nations all around the world can and probably will
fail. But the USA can survive the ages so long as we never again
embrace the notion that anyone should get… "something" for nothing. A
THRIVING economy will finally put our governments back in their place
as our SERVANTS rather than as our taskmasters!
I invite each of you who are interested to read my just-published,
socioeconomic genre book: 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity', which is available at Amazon and B & N. If you like what
have to I say, I hope you will leave a reader comment for others to
see.
All across this great land, we must unite as INDIVIDUALS, because:
"United we stand; divided we fall!" May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics.
>
On Nov 20, 4:35 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> The Survival of the USA is no 'game'; it is WAR!
>
> I have had favorable dealings with the vast majority of Blacks with
> whom I have come into contact throughout my life. Most of those
> Blacks, at least in social settings, have seemed to be sensible and
> caring people. Naively, I had been someone who supposed that
> "separate but equal" should be fair for Blacks, and everyone else,
> especially as related to education. Because I loved and honored my
> white family linage, I could see "advantages" in discouraging racial
> mixing, simply, by keeping whites and Blacks separated.
>
> Glenn Beck did a show about Blacks who had played key roles in the
> American Revolution. One of those was a 'free' Black named James
> Armistead. He was well educated and articulate. Armistead wished to
> aid the American cause. First, he agreed to spy on the British, and
> latter he became a double agent 'pretending' to spy on the Americans.
> The crucial information he provided to the Americans enabled George
> Washington to defeat the British at Yorktown. And the USA would soon
> be an independent nation.
>
> My fraternal ancestors were descendants of William Armistead, who had
> settled in Virginia, and owned a large estate. My great, great
> grandfather was John Armistead, who moved to Alpharetta, GA as the
> result of land grants given to those who had fought in the
> Revolution. John was a contemporary of James Armistead. I don't
> think it is a coincidence that John named a son 'James'. I have a
> strong feeling that John and James were raised together, and educated
> together like brothers. James was never treated like a… slave. He
> was treated like family. That is the sort of integrity I know has
> been there through the generations in my family, and it's the type of
> integrity I hope I myself possess.
>
> Those who have read my regular posts know that I see group influences,
> including Black "racist" influences—as has been manifested in… 'block
> voting'—as being very threatening to the survival of the USA. My New
> Constitution makes it a felony to lobby for special privileges for any
> group. At the same time, it requires all holders of public office to
> swear, on penalty of death, to obey this oath: "Fair play and
> democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!"
>
> Most thinking Americans, regardless of race, should realize that
> stealing is a crime. Religious Americans should also know, and obey,
> the commandments not to steal and not to covet. In that light, isn't
> it ironic that about 90% of Blacks see no moral nor criminal
> impropriety in supporting an unconstitutional government that steals
> (taxes without representation) from the "haves" to give to the "have-
> nots"?
>
> Glenn Beck has scratched-the-bottom-of-the-barrel in pointing out the
> overt corruption in Washington. In the month before his huge 8/18
> rally in Washington, Beck became a tearful pacifist in what should
> have been a WAR effort to take back control of our government from the
> socialists and the communists. His present persona is more an
> evangelist than a warrior. Though he is a multi-millionaire, Beck
> protects his family from the expected rise in the price of food by
> stockpiling a year's worth of groceries. He also says he has
> "weapons" to protect his stores. In the coming weeks he promises to
> educate viewers how to survive our economic crisis like pacifists.
>
> I watch each of Beck's shows via my VCR. About 30% of those have a
> level of passion making it difficult not to stay tuned. Yet this
> country is STILL going-down-the-tubes. And Beck is consistently
> clueless that our broke government can only be FIXED by ratifying my
> New Constitution. He likes to suppose there is an "eight year old"
> future George Washington who will save America in 30 years or so. He
> (or his ghost writers) keep cranking out books as though he knows what
> the hell he is talking about.
>
> Fox is the only "news" (such as it is) network that I watch. This
> week that Rockefeller congressman proposed that Fox News and MSNBC
> should be shut down by the FCC. Though I am a fiscal ultra-
> conservative, I tend to agree. Fox's GROSS management error is to
> keep giving… "equal time" to leftist, socialist/communist interests.
> My New Constitution says the following:
>
> "Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity
> nor bias." When "fair & balanced" gives equal time to those touting
> the objectives of the unconstitutional Democratic Party, and gives
> equal air time to PROMOTE the economic and social destruction of the
> USA, then Fox News becomes the enemy of the USA!
>
> Rush Limbaugh, perhaps taking his cue from me, sees the networks' use
> of 'polls' as turning politics into an unending GAME. There is
> constant speculation about who will run against… Barack Obama. I
> almost vomit mouthing the last words. That's because Obama (choked)
> in taking the required Oath of Office to be President in 2009. Such
> oath requires that Obama support and defend the Constitution. But
> from minute ONE, he had no intention of doing any such thing! He
> wants the USA to be a dictatorship with him in charge. If socialism
> and communism are unfair, Obama is even more in favor of those.
>
> A most dire indication is how polls continue to show that 40% or so of
> Americans (the block voters for Obama) think Obama is doing OK as
> President. None of those who so state, regularly watch Fox News. In
> fact, most of them get their "news" from the ultra liberal "leaders"
> in the pulpits of Black churches all across America. As with the Rev.
> Jeremiah Wright, "Damn the USA!" is the effect. The issue for Blacks
> is to keep jumping-up-and-down in unison to ultimately… "win" the
> game. As a racist group, BLACKS couldn't care less whether they break
> the economic back of this country. I hope many of you will agree that
> those who work to effectively destroy the USA, economically or
> otherwise, are guilty of TREASON!
>
> Glenn Beck, fearing retribution if he continues to lambaste Obama, is
> now pointing his finger hardest toward… George Soros as the ultra-
> liberal who is most threatening to this country. But I see that as a
> cop-out. Those most threatening to this country are Barack Obama,
> Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the entire leadership of the Democratic
> Party! The Democrats are ORGANIZED CRIME intent on stealing from the
> successful and giving the leftovers to the undeserving unsuccessful.
> There is nothing FAIR nor constitutional about that!
>
> Block-voting Blacks; labor unions; free-choice younger women; single-
> cause environmentalists, and the lazy, good-for-nothing, perpetual
> students in our valueless universities, have it within their "power"
> to destroy this country. Oh how they will all rejoice if Obama or
> some other liberal crook wins in 2012. But there will be no non-
> inflated payoffs to the lazy. "Winning" should only be worthwhile
> when the motives behind the effort are to do what is best for the USA
> as a whole. Only by massively downsizing every government in this
> country, and removing the millstones from around the necks of fair-
> minded businesses, can there be hope for the salvation of the USA and
> the return to prosperity for the most Americans.
>
> Blacks, and all legitimate minorities, will, under my New
> Constitution, be guaranteed fair treatment in competing within our
> free-enterprise, capitalist system. That will be important to them,
> only, if they don't expect to get preferential treatment from any
> government. The capitalist game doesn't handicap the various players
> according to race. Success awaits those who will work hard, and plan
> well.
>
> I invite each of you who are interested to read my just-published,
> socioeconomic genre book: 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> Prosperity', which is available at Amazon and B & N. If you like what
> have to I say, I hope you will leave a reader comment for others to
> see.
>
> All across this great land, we must unite as INDIVIDUALS, because:
> "United we stand; divided we fall!" May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics.
>
>
>
> On Nov 14, 1:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Cutting government down to size!
>
> > After the Democratic Party got wounded, but not killed, in the Nov. 2,
> > 2010 midterm election, the liberal media keeps asking Republicans how
> > they expect they will be running things any better, beginning next
> > year. Amazingly, most Republicans talk about "creating jobs" as being
> > the number one issue Congress must address. *** I've got news for the
> > media and for the blockheads in government: Government involvement
> > does NOT create jobs; only government DISINVOLVEMENT will create jobs!
>
> > For too long, the majority of Americans seem to accept that government
> > must pull-the-strings of every aspect of American business and
> > societal interaction. The American Free Enterprise System isn't a
> > form of government. It's the GOVERNMENTLESS-well-functioning of an
> > entire economy! A very minimum of laws, and zero bureaucracies, are
> > required to have a well-functioning free enterprise system!
>
> > There is "bold" talk by some Republicans about having a 10% reduction
> > in the work force of the Federal Government. Wow! 10% won't even
> > return government to pre-Obama size. If I were our country's
> > Benevolent Dictator for a year, I would immediately inform every
> > agency or bureaucracy of government— except those responsible for
> > maintaining infrastructure—to trim the work force by 50% within 60
> > days; inform our military to bring home all overseas troops ASAP,
> > except, say, 10% needed as a defensive perimeter of the USA; Inform
> > all able-bodied citizens getting payments of any kind from government,
> > that those payments will stop within 90 days. Additionally, I would
> > strike down every law, except the Civil Rights Act and similar
> > fairness-to-all legislation, that has been passed since the prosperous
> > 1950s; ban political parties; close down the un American US Senate;
> > close any news medium, also giving comments or assessments of the
> > news; ban the media from having access to the US Capital; order the
> > arrest, trial and hanging of all persons who have ever orchestrated
> > changing the USA into a socialist/communist nation. Also, I would
> > outlaw having lawyers be employees or board members of any business
> > other than a law firm; criminalize fraudulent business practices;
> > empower law abiding citizens over those employed by government; stop
> > public financed education at age 16; lower the minimum work age to 13;
> > give amnesty to 90% or more of those imprisoned for non-violent
> > crimes; send back 100% of illegal aliens; make it a capital crime of
> > treason for any public figure to tout socialism, or to foment group-
> > against-group dissension; close the IRS and install a 15% value-added
> > tax (excluding food, medicines and medical expenses) to cover all
> > government functions—local, state, and federal. And, very
> > importantly, I would inform China, and all others who have loaned the
> > USA money, that only the principal will be repaid, and at a speed that
> > is not detrimental to having the US economy recover.
>
> > After reading the above, many of you will be saying, "Damn!" And most
> > will be surprised to learn that making the above "tough-love"
> > corrections to our government won't make millions of people less well-
> > off. Instead, the vast majority of Americans will start being better
> > off within 90 days, due to the INCREASE in the prosperity of the
> > entire country!
>
> > While I was penning and polishing my New Constitution of the United
> > States of America, I had to keep asking myself how what I was writing
> > would be FAIR to the vast majority of Americans. *** Most Americans
> > will be better off by having the USA, again, become the greatest and
> > most prosperous industrial nation in the world! When that happens—as
> > will immediately be fostered by the ratification of my New Constitution
> > —there will be a 75% reduction in the number of Americans needing
> > government handouts for any purpose. A prosperous economy will,
> > again, enable most citizens to be self-sufficient. Those who, in
> > spite of everything, remain less fortunate, will discover that the
> > lucky HAVES will be more charitable once they aren't treated like
> > scum, simply because they know how to be successful. I would propose
> > that the successful pair up with, and mentor, the unsuccessful on
> > becoming self-sufficient. "Give people FISH, and they remain
> > dependent. But teach them HOW to fish, and they become self-
> > sufficient!"
>
> > While the likes of Glenn Beck advocate stockpiling a year's worth of
> > food to combat the expected rise in food prices, I advocate making the
> > needed STRUCTURAL changes in our government(s) so that the USA economy
> > functions as FAIRLY as possible. This post itemizes maybe 10% of the
> > ways that my New Constitution STRENGTHENS the original document. I'm
> > certain the Founding Fathers would say "Amen!" to what I have done in
> > our nation's behalf, because I asked myself how they would feel at
> > every juncture!
>
> > I invite those of you who are interested to read my just-published,
> > socioeconomic genre book: 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> > Prosperity', which is available at Amazon and B & N. If you like what
> > have to I say, I hope you will leave a reader comment for others to
> > see.
>
> > All across this great land, we must unite as INDIVIDUALS, because:
> > "United we stand; divided we fall!" May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
>
> > Respectfully submitted,
>
> > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics.
>
> > On Nov 4, 6:02 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > There is little value in "winning" in the wasteful game of politics.
>
> > > At my own local polling place, which happens to be the main Black
> > > voting place in my small town, the turnout on 11/02/10 was very high
> > > among Blacks. It is probable that those Blacks punched the "straight
> > > Democratic party" button. Each individual, regardless of race, has
> > > the right to choose for whom they will vote. But for Blacks, the
> > > issue wasn't about doing what is best for the USA—which I must add,
> > > ultimately, is what is best for each individual—but about voting, with
> > > unity, for the Black race against the World. As in fighting a war,
> > > there is seen to be strength in banding together, without question, to
> > > try to gain advantage for one's group.
>
> > > Though Democrats suffered big losses, the biases which caused the
> > > obvious unity of the leftist Democrats, most of whom still "support"
> > > Obama, are alive and well. Like a socialist CANCER, the disease has
> > > been slowed, but not stopped, from mortally wounding the USA.
> > > Democrats see themselves as only loosing at the half, in a game which
> > > still has one half to go. As long as… "their candidate", Barack
> > > Obama, says he needs more time, Democrats have no problem waiting two
> > > more years.
>
> > > Rush Limbaugh was most eloquent on his radio show, yesterday, in
> > > describing the country-destroying effects of liberal objectives. He
> > > asked: "Where in the Constitution does it say that those who are
> > > successful must be controlled by the unsuccessful?" What Limbaugh
> > > should have said was: "The USA Constitution was, first and foremost,
> > > about having the maximum of individual Liberties and the Freedom of
> > > Self-determination. That means that people get to succeed or fail by
> > > their own efforts and nobody else's. The ultimate loss of freedom is
> > > to allow the successful to be robbed by the unsuccessful simply
> > > because the numbers of the unsuccessful are so high, and are getting
> > > higher. As long as it is a crime to steal, in any wise, then it is a
> > > crime for a group like the Democratic Party to orchestrate the
> > > unconstitutional theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars from
> > > American families over the lives of those now living, or not yet
> > > born. The Democratic Party is organized crime, plain and simple! The
> > > leadership of that party is clearly guilty of plotting to destroy the
> > > USA, and that is high TREASON!" Limbaugh should be making statements,
> > > not asking questions about the criminality so rampant in America.
>
> > > The usual post-election talk is about who will assume "leadership"
> > > positions during the coming term. Here is what my New Constitution
> > > says:
>
> > > "The House shall judge its members on the appropriateness of their
> > > districts' boundaries and population thereof, and shall enumerate and
> > > fairly adjudge members' qualifications without discrimination due to
> > > sex, race, creed, nor political ideology. The House makes the rules
> > > for its proceedings, punishes disorderly members, and with the assent
> > > of 60% can expel a member for a violation. *** But no rule shall be
> > > made that concentrates power in any individual(s) beyond his or her
> > > one vote. 55% attendance is a quorum. Those present may compel
> > > absent members to attend, or penalize non attendance. Written, audio
> > > and video record shall be made of all House proceedings. Master
> > > records shall not be destroyed, and copies shall be made readily
> > > available to any Citizen for a nominal fee."
>
> > > In a fair and democratic (not the party) Congress, there shall be no
> > > leaders with more power than any other member. In effect, the
> > > "speaker" is chosen as a parliamentarian who is changed frequently,
> > > and gets to preside over proceedings without having any power beyond
> > > his or her one vote. All of the former "rules" allowing the winning
> > > political party to have more power in committees or elsewhere are
> > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
>
> > > It is amazing that a liberal state like Nevada gets to elect a Senator
> > > like Harry Reid who has betrayed his country by favoring socialism.
> > > In the single day that it will take to ratify my New Constitution, the
> > > US Senate will be no more! Its members aren't determined by
> > > principles of a Republic nor a Democracy. So, they are an
> > > unconstitutional oligarchy,
>
> > ...
>
> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment