Re: I am not surprised at this editorial in the NYT - they are trying to cover up their reasons for publishing these leaks and others

Get this. Earlier this year the Times refused to publish the
documents and emails regarding Global Warming scientists fudging their
data because . . .

. . . wait for it

"They were not intended for public viewing"

The Gray Lady's double standard is dangling between her legs for all
to see, and its fucking ugly.

On Nov 30, 4:24 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>      The NYT seems to think that these leaks justify their releasing the
> US diplomatic and military secrets.  Not in my opinion.   I would really
> like to see them prosecuted for these releases to the nth degree.
>
> Unsurprisingly the commenters don't seem to see much if anything wrong
> with releasing secrets to the enemy.  What is wrong with these people.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/opinion/30tue1.html?nl=todaysheadli...

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.