Re: Urgent Message to New York State Voters: Don't Let Obstructionist Republicans Win Back The State Senate

Wrong and false again.

Civil marriage is distinct and separate from religious marriage. As
long as the government codifies marriage, all people must be included
in those laws equally regardless of gender. Churches are then free to
bless those civil marriage contracts or not as they choose.

Civil rights matters should NEVER be placed on the ballot, for the
majority almost always votes AGAINST the minority.

Your homophobia and discrimination is showing again, Keithie.

On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dick was right on the money TommyTomTomForNews.....What you seek is "special
> rights" and additional privileges above what every other American has,
> because of who you want to hop in the sack with.
>
> As it stands now, you can marry anyone that you so choose, just as any other
> man, or woman can.
>
> If you want to redefine the definition of marriage, (which is an
> ecclesiastical function, and throughout history is defined as being between
> a man and a woman) then put it up for a vote. Let's see how that goes for
> ya.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> False twisted pretzel logic. No dice, no points to Dick.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/1/10, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> > And the support of the people of NY state is what? Do you have numbers
>> > as to what support this has?
>> >
>> > Also remember that members of legislative bodies represent their
>> > constituents. Suppose the constituents supported civil unions but not
>> > marriage, something which is common across the country. If the civil
>> > union gave you the benefits of marriage, why would you give a damn. And
>> > if the constituents supported civil unions but not marriage, then that
>> > is what their senators should vote. Did you ask why the 8 Dems voted
>> > against? If they had not voted against it would have passed 32-30.
>> > Blame them!
>> >
>> > On 11/01/2010 02:01 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>> >> On December 2nd, 2009, by a vote of 38
>> >> Nays to 24 Yeas, The New York State Senate Voted Against Marriage
>> >> Equality.
>> >> Every single Republican and eight Democrats voted for discrimination.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>> What stand-alone bill did the Republicans vote for discrimination.
>> >>> If
>> >>> you are still harping on DADT, they should have noted against that
>> >>> debacle. The garbage that was tacked onto that bill made it
>> imperative
>> >>> to see it did not get passed.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you want repeal of DADT passed, then put up a bill that repeals
>> >>> DADT. Also make sure that you also change the UCMJ as well. As it
>> >>> stands now if all you do is let the judge say DADT is bad, then it
>> >>> defaults to the older legislation in UCMJ which actually does not even
>> >>> include DADT but only dismissal. Stop playing stupid games with the
>> >>> crap. Pitiful! Also remember who first passed and signed DADT. And
>> >>> no, it was not the Republicans. Thank your hero, Bubba, and his crew
>> >>> that were in charge.
>> >>>
>> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:21 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>> >>>> Every single Republican voted for discrimination.
>> >>>> Every single one. No exceptions.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Do NOT vote for a Republican obstructionist under ANY circumstances.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> A Republican Mammoth:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyJOJsGRs8oWxDz90hxbo_0O93C3pM6WkO7lza_NSVemaCcidISmkxKYRF6eXT-MUotqEVFIT0vR786EjLlzgIMF4WTRPW4v4rdcc9sfQ0Rjerfl1UscURXTjCxUGvdGJLS3k3n_Xub2-y/s400/GOP+mammoth+large.jpg
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa<keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >>>>> For options& help see
>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at
>> >>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >>> --
>> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >>>
>> >>> * Visit our other community at
>> >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > * Visit our other community at
>> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.