Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
bring
in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
will
not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.

One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.

There are NO second chances. /Annointed One

I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the victim,
and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very ignorant
or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
"children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed the
boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it, Merc
is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge or
even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
others here abouts....
There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is living
a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among "half-
way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the crap
that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
"banning".....
Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....

On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nominal9,
>
> I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To bring
> in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I will
> not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my country.
> To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> There are NO second chances.
>
> On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Annointed One,  Keith from Tampa...
> > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the low, in
> > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass  stupid, as
> > well.....  have to be, to think censorship is any sort of answer....
> > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > brains... for eternity....
> > nominal9
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e...
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237...
> > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the Pusillanimous
> > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along with the
> > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at least
> > two
> > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > comparison
> > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of the
> > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that les and
> > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to run
> > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say... censorship
> > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > warning  of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation of
> > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame....Consigned
> > to  an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor and
> > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell with
> > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit, the
> > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow Head Up
> > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > misery...
>
> > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > nominal9
>
> > Rogue    View profile
> >   More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > message | Find messages by this author
> > Rabbit?  Ban posters?
>
> > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > - Hide quoted text -
> > -Reporting spam
> > Message reported
> >     Rate this post:
>
> > nominal9    View profile
> >   More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter... Rabbit...
> > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove |
> > Report
> > this message | Find messages by this author
>
> >http://www.bio.miami.edu/hare/poop.html
>
> > Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet... with the shit-eating grin..... /
> > n9
>
> > Then I tried to add another post in reply to a snide aside by Rabbit
> > under his pseudonym...RighteousObserver...
> > here's Rabbit's "concealed" whiny-ass post
>
> > From: RighteousObserver <tinywhiterab...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > Local: Tues, Aug 31 2010 7:24 am
> > Subject: I Sucked The Fun Out Of 71 And Now I'm Here For You On 72!
> > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this
> > message | Find messages by this author
> > I *am* RighteousOberserver.
>
> > Sworn Defender of Board Justice and um..er..other stoopid shit like
> > that.
>
> > <doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin' the crab><doin' the crab>grrrrr</doin'
> > the crab> / rabbit
>
> > To which I replied with my own counter that flashed on the board for
> > a
> > minute or so... before rabbit proceeded to  remove it from 72...
> > as I recall it....
>
> > "The cecotrophic Rabbit, the pusillanimous pellet with the shit-
> > eating grin... turns two big floppy deaf ears...."
>
> > That was it.... looks like I'm "Banned" from 72... too.....another
> > badge of honor.....
> > Always good to be Banned by the Damned ... see?... Rabbit does
> > deserve
> > to be in Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame...
>
> > n9- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.