Nero to Noah: Zardari beaten both
By Dr Shahid Qureshi
Thursday 29 July 2010
'Nero' President Zardari gone on holiday to Paris and London when country is under water due to allegedly 'doctored floods' (HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a little-known, yet critically important U.S. military defence program which has generated quite a bit of controversy over the years in certain circles). He found £2500 per night shelter for him and £300 per night for his staff in London at the expanse of poor Pakistani taxpayers according to his soft spoken information minister. No one knows what pressed him so much that deaths of thousands of innocent people in floods were not enough to shorten his trip? This is the extreme of selfishness and saddest revenge from people of Pakistan. He would have been definitely on gardening leave with his dog or receiving 'art therapy' if Benazir Bhutto was alive today. She must be turning in her gave as what he has done to the party and Pakistan?
Some analysts are describing President Zardari's visit to Britain and meeting with Prime Minister David Cameron as: 'he came, he saw and he surrendered'. He thinks he is smart, but Brits are smarter than him. The loot money of Pakistani politicians and elite including Zardari and his cronies invested/ hidden in the West including Britain is far more than over a billion $ hunter jet trainers deal with India?
But these so called champions of democracy who can't see beyond their noses when it comes to democracy in their own parties have no respect in the British establishment. Otherwise how it could be possible that Pakistan who have suffered the highest economic over $50 billion and thousands of human losses in the fraudulent 'war on terror' can be treated like that. In reality it was/is US and its allies playing double and triple game with Pakistan all along by patronising half a dozen Indian consulates in occupied Afghanistan who are interfering in Pakistan and exporting terrorism into Pakistan. Pakistan is a victim due to the treachery of the so called 'filthy rich elite', which is more filthy than rich. One of the reasons Afghanistan is not conquered by the high tech invaders is according to a senior US diplomat, 'it does not have a corrupt elite to collaborate'. This kind of elite is abundantly available in Pakistan as well as in India.
"British Disaster Emergency Committee (DEC) is making appeals for the donations for the flood victims of Pakistan. DEC normally make appeals when disaster is critical. Now in this situation what excuse President Zardari has to stay abroad? Moreover you mentioned about President been raising funds for the flood victims. Mr Zardari is himself a billionaire (in US$) and his party elite has flats, villas and properties in London. How much Mr Zardari has donated to the flood victims? I asked Mr Qamar Zaman Kaira, the federal minister for Information at a meeting in London on 5th August 2010.
He gave us all a short sermon in the favour of President but could not tell the people, how much Mr Zardari has donated to the flood victim funds. Well some of his colleagues have bought multi million pounds properties in London to join the Zardari club. A simple example of this loot is that "phone call charges are going down in the whole world but in Pakistan they are going up because of personal interests of Rehman Malik i.e. Zardari" a participant was telling me at the meeting.
In another question from a senior journalist as, "how many times President Zardari visited Pakistani troops on the front line like US President Obama and British leaders frequently visit US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq for moral boosting? The information said, 'due to security reasons he can't visit troops'. Does the Commander in Chief of the armed forces need invitation to visit his troops on the front line?
This whole Zardari regime is full of foreign nationals, fraudsters, criminals, money launders and aliens?
Fauzia Wahab, defender of Zardari becomes 'annoyingly idiotic' in his defence on live TV channels. She asked a senior TV host, 'how much you have donated to the flood victims as you are asking how much Zardari has donated? He said, 'I don't have US$ 60 millions in my account and I don't need to announce on TV'. In the same program she kept referring Sir Hillary Synnot a famous well respected former British diplomat who has served in Pakistan as 'she'. At least she should have get information about some one who is writing in favour of Pakistan in the Financial Times. The whole party is full of liars, crooks and corrupts beyond gender differences.
A senior journalist based in Washington wrote: "Whatever spins the Presidency and the PPP media managers may put on their super duper follies or political misadventures and miscalculations, they cannot hide the fact that relations between the Presidency and the GHQ are at best cold and indifferent and at worst bitter and confrontational. This cold war is seemingly escalating and the strongest defender of the president, PPP's Fauzia Wahab, has almost spilled the beans by bursting out on TV channels that the Army was not following the policies of the political leadership and the ISI chief cancelled his visit to the UK on his own, without consulting the political government leadership.
"There are differences and such differences are common everywhere. Even in America this happens," she said without mincing words. "We have to go on even if differences are there. Each (institution) has its own perception and has its own point of view. What do you want the president to do, follow what the ISI was saying?" she asked. She even raised objections and mentioned the statement issued by the GHQ on the Kerry-Lugar Bill.
Even Zafar Hilaly who hailed from the British Raj Loyalist family of Nawab Ismael wrote: "If the most devastating flood in Pakistan's history, the dislocation of nearly three million people and the destruction of nearly a fifth of the nation's food production could not persuade Mr Zardari to stay at home and add his weight to the relief effort, why should the frequent and tedious allegation of exporting terrorists levelled against Pakistan persuade Mr Zardari to put off his jaunt to Britain? Especially when Mr Zardari believes that sticks and stones may break his bones but words can never hurt him. Mr Zardari's (mental) capacity to act wisely is limited".
Zardari's problem is with 'his hard disk' and not software that is why at the time of floods he choose to go to the mountain instead of getting into (Noah's) Arch with people.
By Dr Shahid Qureshi
Thursday 29 July 2010
'Nero' President Zardari gone on holiday to Paris and London when country is under water due to allegedly 'doctored floods' (HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a little-known, yet critically important U.S. military defence program which has generated quite a bit of controversy over the years in certain circles). He found £2500 per night shelter for him and £300 per night for his staff in London at the expanse of poor Pakistani taxpayers according to his soft spoken information minister. No one knows what pressed him so much that deaths of thousands of innocent people in floods were not enough to shorten his trip? This is the extreme of selfishness and saddest revenge from people of Pakistan. He would have been definitely on gardening leave with his dog or receiving 'art therapy' if Benazir Bhutto was alive today. She must be turning in her gave as what he has done to the party and Pakistan?
Some analysts are describing President Zardari's visit to Britain and meeting with Prime Minister David Cameron as: 'he came, he saw and he surrendered'. He thinks he is smart, but Brits are smarter than him. The loot money of Pakistani politicians and elite including Zardari and his cronies invested/ hidden in the West including Britain is far more than over a billion $ hunter jet trainers deal with India?
But these so called champions of democracy who can't see beyond their noses when it comes to democracy in their own parties have no respect in the British establishment. Otherwise how it could be possible that Pakistan who have suffered the highest economic over $50 billion and thousands of human losses in the fraudulent 'war on terror' can be treated like that. In reality it was/is US and its allies playing double and triple game with Pakistan all along by patronising half a dozen Indian consulates in occupied Afghanistan who are interfering in Pakistan and exporting terrorism into Pakistan. Pakistan is a victim due to the treachery of the so called 'filthy rich elite', which is more filthy than rich. One of the reasons Afghanistan is not conquered by the high tech invaders is according to a senior US diplomat, 'it does not have a corrupt elite to collaborate'. This kind of elite is abundantly available in Pakistan as well as in India.
"British Disaster Emergency Committee (DEC) is making appeals for the donations for the flood victims of Pakistan. DEC normally make appeals when disaster is critical. Now in this situation what excuse President Zardari has to stay abroad? Moreover you mentioned about President been raising funds for the flood victims. Mr Zardari is himself a billionaire (in US$) and his party elite has flats, villas and properties in London. How much Mr Zardari has donated to the flood victims? I asked Mr Qamar Zaman Kaira, the federal minister for Information at a meeting in London on 5th August 2010.
He gave us all a short sermon in the favour of President but could not tell the people, how much Mr Zardari has donated to the flood victim funds. Well some of his colleagues have bought multi million pounds properties in London to join the Zardari club. A simple example of this loot is that "phone call charges are going down in the whole world but in Pakistan they are going up because of personal interests of Rehman Malik i.e. Zardari" a participant was telling me at the meeting.
In another question from a senior journalist as, "how many times President Zardari visited Pakistani troops on the front line like US President Obama and British leaders frequently visit US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq for moral boosting? The information said, 'due to security reasons he can't visit troops'. Does the Commander in Chief of the armed forces need invitation to visit his troops on the front line?
This whole Zardari regime is full of foreign nationals, fraudsters, criminals, money launders and aliens?
Fauzia Wahab, defender of Zardari becomes 'annoyingly idiotic' in his defence on live TV channels. She asked a senior TV host, 'how much you have donated to the flood victims as you are asking how much Zardari has donated? He said, 'I don't have US$ 60 millions in my account and I don't need to announce on TV'. In the same program she kept referring Sir Hillary Synnot a famous well respected former British diplomat who has served in Pakistan as 'she'. At least she should have get information about some one who is writing in favour of Pakistan in the Financial Times. The whole party is full of liars, crooks and corrupts beyond gender differences.
A senior journalist based in Washington wrote: "Whatever spins the Presidency and the PPP media managers may put on their super duper follies or political misadventures and miscalculations, they cannot hide the fact that relations between the Presidency and the GHQ are at best cold and indifferent and at worst bitter and confrontational. This cold war is seemingly escalating and the strongest defender of the president, PPP's Fauzia Wahab, has almost spilled the beans by bursting out on TV channels that the Army was not following the policies of the political leadership and the ISI chief cancelled his visit to the UK on his own, without consulting the political government leadership.
"There are differences and such differences are common everywhere. Even in America this happens," she said without mincing words. "We have to go on even if differences are there. Each (institution) has its own perception and has its own point of view. What do you want the president to do, follow what the ISI was saying?" she asked. She even raised objections and mentioned the statement issued by the GHQ on the Kerry-Lugar Bill.
Even Zafar Hilaly who hailed from the British Raj Loyalist family of Nawab Ismael wrote: "If the most devastating flood in Pakistan's history, the dislocation of nearly three million people and the destruction of nearly a fifth of the nation's food production could not persuade Mr Zardari to stay at home and add his weight to the relief effort, why should the frequent and tedious allegation of exporting terrorists levelled against Pakistan persuade Mr Zardari to put off his jaunt to Britain? Especially when Mr Zardari believes that sticks and stones may break his bones but words can never hurt him. Mr Zardari's (mental) capacity to act wisely is limited".
Zardari's problem is with 'his hard disk' and not software that is why at the time of floods he choose to go to the mountain instead of getting into (Noah's) Arch with people.
No comments:
Post a Comment