Re: Graffiti tagger sentenced to 8 years in prison

and you, mine.

On Jul 15, 10:18 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You just proved my point completely.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > what I can see
> > -------
> > a universe unexplored, I'm sure
>
> > On Jul 15, 10:13 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> Sounds like you think you do but from what I can see you relate only
> >> insults and usually with nothing to do with the conversation.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>> I usually relate my insults to the conversation - like
> >>> "Republicans...etc." unless it's a dick...<thompson>
>
> >>> On Jul 15, 4:37 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> (I say that only in jest!!!  I meant no offense, and I apologize if I
> >>>> offended you!!)
>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:33 PM, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> So, I called you a crack head - when?
>
> >>>>> On Jul 15, 4:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Euwe, you need to go back and re-read my missives.  First, I thought the
> >>>>>> Judge who sentenced Sebastian Perez was an asshole.   I wrote as much.  I
> >>>>>> even called an attorney friend of mine who is in Texas to find out what
>
> >>>>> he
>
> >>>>>> knew about the case, I was that ready to get invovled in it.  Turns out
>
> >>>>> the
>
> >>>>>> kid has an appeal, pro bono, being performed for him.  His record is less
> >>>>>> than stellar, but probably not a bad kid.
>
> >>>>>> The BP debacle, I have written to you personally, and told you what a
> >>>>>> clusterfuck I think is going on there.   BP is no angel.  Having said
>
> >>>>> that,
>
> >>>>>> to suggest that criminal charges are warranted at this juncture, is,
> >>>>>> well......Moonbattery.....
>
> >>>>>  > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> put a sock in it - you all were dead sure the tagger was guilty of
> >>>>>>> felony intent to distribute without any more than the information that
> >>>>>>> I provided in the links to bp's negligence, fairly bloodthirsty
> >>>>>>> vampires ready to condemn - thank GOD they got that guy off the street
> >>>>>>> into prison!... but even with the preponderance of evidence that bp
> >>>>>>> was negligent from the statements of the people involved, you're
> >>>>>>> willing to turn a blind eye to them... oh, they're probably not guilty
> >>>>>>> - no reason to be upset.. calm down don't worry, I'm sure someone else
> >>>>>>> is going to be upset - but not ME!
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 15, 4:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Put the crack rock pipe down Euwe.
>
> >>>>>>>> You and your Moonbat ilk don't have a lock on compassion.
>
> >>>>>>>> We feel yours and those who lost their lives' pain.....
>
> >>>>>>>  > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Much ado, about nothing
> >>>>>>>>> --------
> >>>>>>>>> clearly, Republicans are focused on playing down obvious corporate
> >>>>>>>>> negligence in the pursuit of profit...even to the point of
>
> >>>>> apologizing
>
> >>>>>>>>> for setting up a fund to eliminate delays and lawyering up to avoid
> >>>>>>>>> paying the victims.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Bleeding heart liberals and their trees... now it's bleeding heart
> >>>>>>>>> Republicans and their marshes, but instead of "save the spotted
>
> >>>>> owl"
>
> >>>>>>>>> it's "save the reputation of unregulated corporate greed" - blame
>
> >>>>> the
>
> >>>>>>>>> regulator, not the killer... Randian extension to "if you regulate
>
> >>>>> gun
>
> >>>>>>>>> ownership, only criminals will have guns," to: "if everyone had
>
> >>>>> guns,
>
> >>>>>>>>> and there were no regulations, no one would be murdered, and only
> >>>>>>>>> criminals would die of gunshot wounds - because every handgun death
>
> >>>>> is
>
> >>>>>>>>> caused by the regulation of handguns, not by the murderer."
>
> >>>>>>>>> Republicans: Save the corporations from regulation at all cost! No
> >>>>>>>>> innocent death should deter us! No environmental tragedy! No
>
> >>>>> economic
>
> >>>>>>>>> disaster! Laissez-faire uber alles!
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 15, 3:11 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Much ado, about nothing, and an attempt by those who are against
>
> >>>>>>> drilling
>
> >>>>>>>>> to
>
> >>>>>>>>>> make a case out of thin air.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> "These allegations will neither distract the company's focus on
>
> >>>>>>> stopping
>
> >>>>>>>>> the
>
> >>>>>>>>>> leak nor alter our commitment to restore the Gulf coast," Hayward
>
> >>>>>>> said.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Other parties besides BP may be responsible for costs and
>
> >>>>>>> liabilities
>
> >>>>>>>>>> arising from the oil spill, and we expect those parties to live
>
> >>>>> up to
>
> >>>>>>>>> their
>
> >>>>>>>>>> obligations."
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Both companies used the design much more often, on average, than
>
> >>>>>>> other
>
> >>>>>>>>> major
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Gulf drillers. Out of 218 deepwater wells in the Gulf drilled
>
> >>>>> since
>
> >>>>>>> July
>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2003, 26 percent  {of BP PLC's wells} used the long-string
>
> >>>>> design. It
>
> >>>>>>>>>> derives its name from its use of a single, long "string" of pipe
>
> >>>>> from
>
> >>>>>>> the
>
> >>>>>>>>>> sea floor to the bottom of the well.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Other big drillers use long-string design less frequently than
>
> >>>>> BP,
>
> >>>>>>>>> according
>
> >>>>>>>>>> to the Journal's data
> >>>>>>>>>> analysis<
>
> >>>>>https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.h..
>
> >>>>>>> .>.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Royal Dutch Shell PLC used long string designs on 8 percent of
>
> >>>>> its
>
> >>>>>>> wells
>
> >>>>>>>>> and
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Chevron Corp. on 15 percent. Australian firm BHP Billiton PLC
>
> >>>>> used
>
> >>>>>>> long
>
> >>>>>>>>>> string on 4 percent of its wells."
>
> >>>>>>>>>>http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/18/bp-relied-cheaper-wells/
>
> >>>>>>>>>> ===================
>
> >>>>>>>>>> If it turns out that BP was negligent, as I have stated, "Let the
>
> >>>>>>> chips,
>
> >>>>>>>>>> fall where they may".
>
> >>>>>>>>>  --
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>>>>>> For options & help seehttp://
>
> >>>>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>
> >>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>
> >>>>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>
> >>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>  Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>
> >>>>> <http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>
> >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>>>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>>>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.