Thursday, December 1, 2011

Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws

Carrier IQ Vs. Wiretap Laws
Network diagnostic software maker Carrier IQ feels the heat after a
researcher's video demonstrates how software captured his every
keystroke. But is that illegal?

By Mathew J. Schwartz InformationWeek
December 01, 2011 12:51 PM

Diagnostic tools running on over 141 million handsets appear to record
every keystroke made on the device. The software, which is made by
Carrier IQ, is deployed by wireless carriers on their smartphones.

The ability of telecommunications carriers to assess the health of
their network is enshrined in federal law, which even gives carriers
the ability to listen in on phone calls to ensure that they go
through. But what's less clear is this: Does a third-party service
such as Carrier IQ, which provides diagnostic software hidden on
smartphones, enjoy the same protections as telecommunications
providers?

That's a relevant question since security researcher Trevor Eckhart
released a video Monday detailing what he sees Carrier IQ software
doing on his device--in this case, an HTC smartphone. In particular,
he found that the Carrier IQ application saw all of the HTTP and HTTPS
traffic from his browser, saw all phone numbers that he input before
they were dialed, and also received the contents of all inbound and
outbound SMS messages.

Based on that revelation, Carrier IQ may run afoul of federal wiretap
regulations. "If the Carrier IQ/cellphone rootkit story is accurate,
this is a clear, massive, felony wiretap. Not a close case," said Paul
Ohm, a former Justice Department prosecutor and law professor at the
University of Colorado Law School, via Twitter. "Carrier IQ, prepare
for a multi-million $ class action lawsuit. Maybe a criminal case too?
Federal wiretapping is a 5-year felony," he tweeted.

Ohm told Forbes.com. "Even if they were collecting only anonymized
usage metrics, it doesn't mean they didn't break the law," said Ohm.
"Then it becomes a hard, open question. And hard open questions take
hundreds of thousands of dollars to make go away."

[Carrier IQ is an insane breach of enterprise trust, says IT leader
Jonathan Feldman. See what he says must change, in Carrier IQ: Mobile
App Crap Must Stop. ]

Interestingly, Carrier IQ has issued multiple statements saying that
its software doesn't track keystrokes. "Carrier IQ would like to
clarify some recent press on how our product is used and the
information that is gathered from smartphones and mobile devices," it
said in a statement issued Nov. 16. "Our software is embedded by
device manufacturers along with other diagnostic tools and software
prior to shipment. While we look at many aspects of a device's
performance, we are counting and summarizing performance, not
recording keystrokes or providing tracking tools," it said.

Carrier IQ's statement came in response to Eckhart suggesting
otherwise in a written report that he released in November, which said
that Carrier IQ's software was recording his keystrokes. In response,
Carrier IQ sent him a cease and desist letter threatening him with
$150,000 in copyright violations for posting its publically accessible
training materials online, and requiring that he retract all of his
research. After the Electronic Frontier Foundation came to Eckhart's
defense, however, the software vendor backed off.

Despite Carrier IQ's statements, questions remain: exactly what is its
software doing, and why? "Many people are clearly confused about this
application and what it does, and it's being explained to nobody,"
said Eckhart, in a follow-up report on Carrier IQ that he released
Wednesday, tied to his new video demonstrating how he sees the Carrier
IQ software capturing data.

"What we don't know--until Carrier IQ and the carriers tell us--is how
much of that information it transmits back to the carriers. Now, if
it's not transmitting it, why would it collect it?" said attorney Mark
Rasch, a former Department of Justice computer crime investigator and
prosecutor who's now director of cybersecurity and privacy consulting
at CSC. "The basic rule should be one of transparency, openness, and
user control, and that's the first place where Carrier IQ or the
providers fell down. People didn't know the stuff was there," he said.

In light of that, did Carrier IQ break federal wiretapping laws?
Interestingly, while Ohm sees this as a clear case of federal
wiretapping laws having been broken, Rasch offers a different
assessment: "The answer to this, of course--like everything else with
the law--is, it depends," he said.

Notably, the law recognizes that carriers must ensure that their
infrastructure is working properly. "The law gives carriers a lot of
leeway in capturing data traveling over their networks, for
specifically this reason--quality control--going back to the days of
copper wires. So the wiretap laws create exceptions," he said. "These
are the guys in the phone booth with alligator clips checking line
quality, call quality, making sure the call went through. Which even
allows the phone company to listen in on a phone call to make sure it
went through."

But on the other hand, while Carrier IQ is working for carriers, its
software tool operates on handsets, which might make it an agent of
the handset manufacturer. Furthermore, instead of capturing data as
it's traveling over their network, it sees the data before it even
gets transmitted.

That might put Carrier IQ's activities into a legal gray area, or it
may be protected under existing statutes. "There's no case law on
this," said Rasch, who calls the related legal questions "clearly
ambiguous," based on his reading of the relevant federal statutes. As
a result, "this is one that's more likely to be decided in the court
of public opinion than it is in a U.S. district court," he said.

Companies that have implemented or are evaluating managed print
services look to the model for its ability to reduce costs and
increase end user productivity. However, IT teams need to be aware of
security and scalability when selecting a partner. Here's how two
large companies in diverse industries got a handle on printing. Read
our report now. (Free registration required.)

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: NYC Muslim Cabbie Asslifters only have to answer to Allah, not to NYC parking laws

just remember who we have to thank for the immigration quotas that
reduced the number of non-europeans into our nation.

now they're crying about the muzzies

On Dec 1, 8:50 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
>            New post on *Bare Naked Islam*
> <http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>  NYC Muslim
> Cabbie Asslifters only have to answer to Allah, not to NYC parking
> laws<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/nyc-muslim-cabbie-assl...>by
> barenakedislam <http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>
>
> Muslim Cab drivers rushing to services at the Islamic Cultural Center at
> Riverside Drive and West 72nd Street are double- and triple-parking outside
> the house of terror-training, forcing northbound traffic on the recently
> re-opened stretch of Riverside Drive to veer into the oncoming traffic
> lane.  DNA INFO  A popular worship service at an Upper West Side [...]
>
> Read more of this
> post<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/nyc-muslim-cabbie-assl...>
>  *barenakedislam<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>
> * | November 30, 2011 at 9:57 PM | Categories: Islam in
> America<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/?cat=52721>| URL:http://wp.me/peHnV-CZ4
>
>   Comment<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/nyc-muslim-cabbie-assl...>
>    See all comments<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/nyc-muslim-cabbie-assl...>
>
>   Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=49883164090367a8ae3126d288a16eee&...>.
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/nyc-muslim-cabbie-assl...
>     Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Chris Christie: The Drug War Has Failed

Paul doesn't have quite the charisma of someone like Chris Christie
---
and just what is charismatic about a fat loudmouth from New Jersey?

On Dec 1, 8:50 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Chris Christie: The Drug War Has FailedE.D. Kain, Contributor
> 11/30/2011 @ 8:46PM |1,812 viewshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHLTIfscaF8&feature=player_embeddedThis is one reason I have a soft spot for the abrasive New Jersey governor. He's basically just a brash, tough-talking moderate with a pretty good sense of certain issues I care about a lot – such as mass incarceration. His soft-spoken counterpart in Indiana, Mitch Daniels, is similarly savvy when it comes to our penal system and the War on Drugs.
> Now that Gary Johnson islikely moving over to the Libertarian Partyafter being almost universally snubbed as a Republican, the remaining anti-drug-war candidate is Ron Paul. Paul doesn't have quite the charisma of someone like Chris Christie. But Christie isn't running so if the drug war is an issue you care about, Ron Paul is your best bet -- certainly much better on the issue than the current president.
> I disagree with Paul on lots of things, but he and Christie are both right that the drug war has failed. It failed a long time ago.http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/11/30/chris-christie-the-drug-war-has-failed/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Newt’s Neocon Army

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWKTOCP45zY&feature=player_embedded

On Dec 1, 10:38 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> warmonger
>
> On Nov 30, 4:14 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > wrote:
> > > Here's a taste of World Team Gingrich:
> > > ----
> > > yes, all are warmongering neocons who should be removed from our
> > > government forever
>
> > > they call all go home to israel and join Larry Franklin, Richard
> > > Pearle, Douglas Feith, and Paul Wolfowitz as hero spies who used the
> > > USA like a two bit whore
>
> > > On Nov 29, 6:23 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > TPM2012Newt's Neocon ArmyBenjy Sarlin & Evan McMorris-Santoro November
> > > 29, 2011, 6:00 AM 5288 54
> > > > When it comes to foreign policy, the Republican frontrunner likes it
> > > old-school. Neo-old school.
> > > > We've had two foreign policy themed debates in the GOP primary now,
> > > which have provided ample opportunity to see what a Republican foreign
> > > policy would look like in 2013. And in the case of Newt Gingrich, it would
> > > probably look like a kind of neocon fantasy land.Foreign Policypublished
> > > anexcellent rundownof Gingrich's foreign policy advising team, most of whom
> > > "have known Newt for decades, and see themselves as helping a candidate who
> > > already boasts a long track record and well-formed intellectual identity
> > > when it comes to foreign policy."
> > > > Here's a taste of World Team Gingrich:David Wurmser: Gingrich's Middle
> > > East policy adviser was a notorious member of Vice President Cheney's inner
> > > circle that pushed the U.S. into war in Iraq. Once he wasquestioned during
> > > an espionage probewhile in the vice president's office, and he was one of
> > > the names driving the initial support for the later disgraced Ahmed
> > > Chalabi. Asked bytheDaily Telegraphin 2007if he was a neocon, he offered
> > > this: "There's nothing 'neo' about me. I'm a very medieval sort of
> > > guy."James Woosley: A former director of the CIA, Woolsey recently spoke at
> > > a panel hosted by the founder of Judicial Watch focused on President
> > > Obama's "political jihadpromoting Islam around the world." Woolsey is a
> > > serious Iran hawk, warning that the way the West is dealing with the nation
> > > at the moment "rhymes with what was taking place in the 1930s [with Nazi
> > > Germany]". Woolsey is a Democrat (of the Lieberman school) but he's helped
> > > Republicans running for president before. In 2008, headvisedJohn
> > > McCain.Stephen Yates: Another ex-Cheney national security team member,
> > > Yates is known among other things for his work on China. Oneformer U.S.
> > > ambassadorto China familiar with Yates says he views "China as the solution
> > > to 'enemy deprivation syndrome.'" AsCounterpunchexplained the theory, "You
> > > need some unifying enemy after the collapse of the Soviet Union." Not
> > > exactly the most productive way to view one of America's most important
> > > trading partner, perhaps.
> > > > It's not just Gingrich who's dipping in the neocon well to form a
> > > national security strategy. Rick Perry, who was once the frontrunner before
> > > descending out of view like so many before him, leaned on former Donald
> > > Rumsfeld deputyDoug Feith, best known for pushing the Al queda-Iraq
> > > connection in the run up to the Iraq War and being called by former Gen.
> > > Tommy Franks "thef***ing stupidest guyon the face of the earth."
> > > > But no one can top Michele Bachmann when it comes to extremist foreign
> > > policy advisers. No less than Islamic fearmonger-in-chiefFrank Gaffney
> > > himselfhas been a foreign policy adviser to her campaign.
> > > > Foreign policy is a favorite topic inside the beltway, though with the
> > > down economy (and a Democratic president in office who never met a
> > > missile-laden drone he didn't like) it's not clear how much of a role
> > > arguments over international affairs will have on the presidential
> > > campaign. Republicans certainly like to ding President Obama over Israel
> > > and Iran, but it's hard to predict how important those fights will be down
> > > the line. Still, the willingness of Republicans to embrace the Bush foreign
> > > policy team which in the end were among the least popular of his
> > > administration is maybe telling.
> > >http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/newt-gingrichs-neocon-army....
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >  Moonbat2..jpg
> > 30KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Boortz: Newt On Immigration

oh, forgot about this one:
Col. North's handwritten notebooks and memoranda show that North and
other U.S. officials were repeatedly informed that the Contras' ties
to trafficking of drugs from Latin America into the United States and
that airplanes from the U.S. used to supply arms to the Contras were
being flown back with Contras personnel aboard carrying cocaine into
the United States.

yes, that pos was also a kingpin in drug trafficking

On Dec 1, 12:42 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He was a warmonger led by zionists, flat out lied to Americans about
> negotiating with and funding terrorists, gave illegals amnesty for
> their crimes, and denied the jewish holocaust.
>
> the worms ate his sorry ass long ago
>
> On Dec 1, 12:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Absolutely!   Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in the 20th Century,
> > and you are either a Moonbat or a Crackpot if you cannot understand that.
>
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, plainolamerican
> > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > a great American!
> > > ---
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIqRnLQ2GCY
>
> > > On Nov 30, 4:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > At least I don't cut and paste hatcet job articles, omitting pertinent
> > > > facts in order to smear a great American!
>
> > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:47 PM, plainolamerican <
> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > bs
>
> > > > > are you trying to defend these criminals?
>
> > > > > oh, isn't that what you do ... defend criminals?
>
> > > > > On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Some do......All of them who hold legitmate jobs, and who have fake
> > > > > social
> > > > > > security cards do....
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, plainolamerican
> > > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though
> > > illegally –
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > > > > businesses,
> > > > > > > paid taxes
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > hold it right there .... illegals do not pay income taxes
>
> > > > > > > Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > hogwash ... it's upholding necessary immigration laws
>
> > > > > > > there is no way in the world we're
> > > > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > we're doing it everyday and should continue to.
> > > > > > > they only reason we haven't already deported millions is because of
> > > > > > > those in our nation who protect them, namely the catholic and
> > > > > > > protestant churches, the jews, hispanics and civil rights
> > > > > > > organizations.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 29, 5:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Great Article!
>
> > > > > > > > *Newt on Immigration*
> > > > > > > > *Neal Boortz*
> > > > > > > > **
> > > > >http://townhall.com/columnists/nealboortz/2011/11/29/newt_on_immigrat.
> > > > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > > OK, Republicans. Since you're so religious and all – it's time
> > > for a
> > > > > > > little
> > > > > > > > "come to Jesus meetin'<
> > > > > > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=come%20to%20jesus>".
> > > > > > > > If you're not familiar with the term, click on the link. It's
> > > time
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > > > little harsh dressing down.
>
> > > > > > > > Do you realize what we have at stake in this election next year?
> > > This
> > > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > > just about taxes, pork spending, social security benefits and
> > > > > repairing
> > > > > > > > bridges. This is about saving our Republic. Do you know we're
> > > already
> > > > > > > past
> > > > > > > > our life expectancy? Economies and societies built on the rule of
> > > > > law,
> > > > > > > > liberty and economic freedom have this troubling tendency to
> > > destroy
> > > > > > > > themselves at around the 200 year mark. This happens when people
> > > > > figure
> > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > they can use the ballot box to get their hands on someone else's
> > > > > stuff.
>
> > > > > > > > Well guess what, folks? We're there. We're past there. We're on
> > > the
> > > > > > > ropes.
> > > > > > > > We're old – and durned near on our deathbed.
>
> > > > > > > > We have a president who was not raised as an American. Oh, I
> > > know.
> > > > > He's a
> > > > > > > > citizen and all that … but he was not infused during his
> > > formative
> > > > > years
> > > > > > > > with how fortunate he was to have been born in this country and
> > > what
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > means to be an American. He lived in Indonesia, for crying out
> > > loud,
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > much of his childhood; that and Hawaii. Well guess what? I lived
> > > in
> > > > > > > Hawaii
> > > > > > > > too, and I can tell you that as a student in Hawaiian schools you
> > > > > weren't
> > > > > > > > exactly saturated with American culture and history. Hawaiian
> > > > > history?
> > > > > > > > Sure. And that's understandable. Hawaiians are very proud of
> > > their
> > > > > > > > heritage. But U.S. history? Only what the schools absolutely had
> > > to
> > > > > > > > include. And that private school, Punahou, that Obama went to in
> > > > > > > Honolulu?
> > > > > > > > Here's another "guess what?" My sister taught there; right
> > > around the
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > that Barry was a student. Again – not a place where you're going
> > > to
> > > > > learn
> > > > > > > > what a blessing it is to be an American and a citizen of the
> > > greatest
> > > > > > > > nation on earth … ever.
>
> > > > > > > > Our president thinks that American greatness comes from
> > > government.
> > > > > He
> > > > > > > > believes that free enterprise is inherently evil. He is robbing
> > > us
> > > > > of our
> > > > > > > > economic liberty as he institutes a command economy. He believes
> > > in
> > > > > using
> > > > > > > > tax policy for income redistribution rather than raising the
> > > revenue
> > > > > > > needed
> > > > > > > > to pay for the basic (Constitutional) functions of government. He
> > > > > said he
> > > > > > > > was going to fundamentally transform the United States of
> > > America,
> > > > > and we
> > > > > > > > stupidly didn't ask him just how he planned to do that. Now we
> > > know.
> > > > > And
> > > > > > > > now we know that for our children to have half a chance of
> > > improving
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > standard of living that we have enjoyed – or even living as well
> > > as
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > -- this man has to be sent back to a community organizing office
> > > > > behind a
> > > > > > > > dry cleaner on the South Side of Chicago … STAT.
>
> > > > > > > > That brings us to Newt Gingrich and this little puddin' storm
> > > over
> > > > > his
> > > > > > > > comments on immigration. Newt suggested that we might not want
> > > to be
> > > > > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though
> > > illegally
> > > > > –
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > > > > businesses,
> > > > > > > > paid taxes and helped drive our economy; and ship them back to
> > > > > Mexico. As
> > > > > > > > soon as those words were out of his mouth Michelle Bachmann –
> > > > > desperate
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > a way to ignite voters – started screeching about "amnesty." In
> > > no
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > had the ObamaMedia falling over itself to parrot the "amnesty"
> > > line
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > call Gingrich out on strikes.
>
> > > > > > > > Let the progs and libs play this thing any way they want … but
> > > you
> > > > > > > > Replublicans; you GOPers … could you make a special effort and
> > > try
> > > > > to get
> > > > > > > > serious here for a minute or two? Think! I've done it on
> > > occasion,
> > > > > and I
> > > > > > > > can promise it's not painful.
>
> > > > > > > > Do we need to enforce our immigration laws? Absolutely! Does the
> > > > > border
> > > > > > > > with Mexico need to be secured? No doubt. And Gingrich has said
> > > he
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > just that. But a bit of realism needs to creep into this
> > > > > conversation.
>
> > > > > > > > I love analogies, so try this one: You come home from work to
> > > find a
> > > > > pipe
> > > > > > > > has broken. Your home is flooded. What is the FIRST thing you
> > > do? Do
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > sit there and argue with people about how you're going to get all
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > water out of your home? No. The FIRST thing you do is shut off
> > > the
> > > > > water.
> > > > > > > > The same logic applies to our immigration problem. The first
> > > thing
> > > > > we do
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > secure our borders. Gingrich says he will shut them down.
>
> > > > > > > > OK … so the flood has stopped. NOW you start to clean up the
> > > mess.
>
> > > > > > > > Republican voters need to mature a bit on this issue …. Not one
> > > of
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > candidates has actually articulated a plan deport all illegals.
> > > Not
> > > > > one.
> > > > > > > > And do you know just why that is? Because every single GOP
> > > candidate,
> > > > > > > > including Bachmann, knows full well that there is no way in the
> > > world
> > > > > > > we're
> > > > > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them
> > > south.
>
> > > > > > > > Try to imagine what the world will think of us (and it does
> > > matter)
> > > > > if we
> > > > > > > > suddenly start looking for people who entered this country
> > > illegally
> > > > > 25
> > > > > > > > years ago; people who then married an American citizen, started a
> > > > > > > business,
> > > > > > > > raised several children – all citizens – and who is now a vital
> > > and
> > > > > > > > integral part of the American economy and his community, not to
> > > > > mention a
> > > > > > > > husband, father and grandfather. So we find these people, and
> > > start
> > > > > > > > shipping them back to Mexico. Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > > Oh, I
> > > > > > > > know. In reality we would just be expelling law-breakers … but
> > > you
> > > > > try to
> > > > > > > > tell that to people we want to like and admire us that when
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: War on drugs revealed as total hoax

The New York Times (NYT) reported that the brother of current Afghan
President Hamid Karzai had actually been on the payroll of the CIA for
at least eight years prior to this information going public in 2009.
Ahmed Wali Karzai was a crucial player in reinstating the country's
opium drug trade, known as Golden Crescent, and the CIA had been
financing the endeavor behind the scenes
-----
Col. North's handwritten notebooks and memoranda show that North and
other U.S. officials were repeatedly informed that the Contras' ties
to trafficking of drugs from Latin America into the United States and
that airplanes from the U.S. used to supply arms to the Contras were
being flown back with Contras personnel aboard carrying cocaine into
the United States.

On Dec 1, 10:57 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Wednesday, November 16, 2011War on drugs revealed as total hoaxUS military admits to guarding, assisting lucrative opium trade in Afghanistanby: Ethan A. Huff
> Afghanistan is, by far, the largest grower and exporter of opium in the world today, cultivating a 92 percent market share of the global opium trade. But what may shock many is the fact that the US military has been specifically tasked with guarding Afghan poppy fields, from which opium is derived, in order to protect this multibillion dollar industry that enriches Wall Street, the CIA, MI6, and various other groups that profit big time from this illicit drug trade scheme.
> Prior to the tragic events of September 11, 2001, Afghanistan was hardly even a world player in growing poppy, which is used to produce both illegal heroin and pharmaceutical-grade morphine. In fact, the Taliban had been actively destroying poppy fields as part of an effort to rid the country of this harmful plant, as was reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on February 16, 2001, in a piece entitled Nation's opium production virtually wiped out (http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...).
> But after 9/11, the US military-industrial complex quickly invaded Afghanistan and began facilitating the reinstatement of the country's poppy industry. According to the United Nations Drug Control Program (UNDCP), opium cultivation increased by 657 percent in 2002 after the US military invaded the country under the direction of then-President George W. Bush (http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-ma...).
> CIA responsible for reinstating opium industry in Afghanistan after 9/11
> More recently, The New York Times (NYT) reported that the brother of current Afghan President Hamid Karzai had actually been on the payroll of the CIA for at least eight years prior to this information going public in 2009. Ahmed Wali Karzai was a crucial player in reinstating the country's opium drug trade, known as Golden Crescent, and the CIA had been financing the endeavor behind the scenes (http://www.infowars.com/ny-times-af...).
> "The Golden Crescent drug trade, launched by the CIA in the early 1980s, continues to be protected by US intelligence, in liaison with NATO occupation forces and the British military," wrote Prof. Michel Chossudovsky in a 2007 report, before it was revealed that Ahmed Wali Karzai was on the CIA payroll. "The proceeds of this lucrative multibillion dollar contraband are deposited in Western banks. Almost the totality of revenues accrue to corporate interests and criminal syndicates outside Afghanistan" (http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/A...).
> But the mainstream media has been peddling a different story to the American public. FOX News, for instance, aired a propaganda piece back in 2010 claiming that military personnel are having to protect the Afghan poppy fields, rather than destroy them, in order to keep the locals happy and to avoid a potential "security risk" -- and FOX News reporter Geraldo Rivera can be heard blatantly lying about poppy farmers being financially supported by the Taliban, rather than the CIA and other foreign interests.
> You can watch that clip here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj-b3pB6M7sSo while tens of thousands of Americans continue to be harmed or killed every year by overdoses from drugs originating from this illicit opium trade, and while cultivation of innocuous crops like marijuana and hemp remains illegal in the US, the American military is actively guarding the very poppy fields in Afghanistan that fuel the global drug trade. Something is terribly wrong with this picture.http://bit.ly/s6vCzl

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Boortz: Newt On Immigration

He was a warmonger led by zionists, flat out lied to Americans about
negotiating with and funding terrorists, gave illegals amnesty for
their crimes, and denied the jewish holocaust.

the worms ate his sorry ass long ago

On Dec 1, 12:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Absolutely!   Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in the 20th Century,
> and you are either a Moonbat or a Crackpot if you cannot understand that.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > a great American!
> > ---
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIqRnLQ2GCY
>
> > On Nov 30, 4:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > At least I don't cut and paste hatcet job articles, omitting pertinent
> > > facts in order to smear a great American!
>
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:47 PM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > bs
>
> > > > are you trying to defend these criminals?
>
> > > > oh, isn't that what you do ... defend criminals?
>
> > > > On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Some do......All of them who hold legitmate jobs, and who have fake
> > > > social
> > > > > security cards do....
>
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, plainolamerican
> > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though
> > illegally –
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > > > businesses,
> > > > > > paid taxes
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > hold it right there .... illegals do not pay income taxes
>
> > > > > > Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > hogwash ... it's upholding necessary immigration laws
>
> > > > > > there is no way in the world we're
> > > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > we're doing it everyday and should continue to.
> > > > > > they only reason we haven't already deported millions is because of
> > > > > > those in our nation who protect them, namely the catholic and
> > > > > > protestant churches, the jews, hispanics and civil rights
> > > > > > organizations.
>
> > > > > > On Nov 29, 5:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Great Article!
>
> > > > > > > *Newt on Immigration*
> > > > > > > *Neal Boortz*
> > > > > > > **
> > > >http://townhall.com/columnists/nealboortz/2011/11/29/newt_on_immigrat.
> > > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > OK, Republicans. Since you're so religious and all – it's time
> > for a
> > > > > > little
> > > > > > > "come to Jesus meetin'<
> > > > > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=come%20to%20jesus>".
> > > > > > > If you're not familiar with the term, click on the link. It's
> > time
> > > > for a
> > > > > > > little harsh dressing down.
>
> > > > > > > Do you realize what we have at stake in this election next year?
> > This
> > > > > > isn't
> > > > > > > just about taxes, pork spending, social security benefits and
> > > > repairing
> > > > > > > bridges. This is about saving our Republic. Do you know we're
> > already
> > > > > > past
> > > > > > > our life expectancy? Economies and societies built on the rule of
> > > > law,
> > > > > > > liberty and economic freedom have this troubling tendency to
> > destroy
> > > > > > > themselves at around the 200 year mark. This happens when people
> > > > figure
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > > they can use the ballot box to get their hands on someone else's
> > > > stuff.
>
> > > > > > > Well guess what, folks? We're there. We're past there. We're on
> > the
> > > > > > ropes.
> > > > > > > We're old – and durned near on our deathbed.
>
> > > > > > > We have a president who was not raised as an American. Oh, I
> > know.
> > > > He's a
> > > > > > > citizen and all that … but he was not infused during his
> > formative
> > > > years
> > > > > > > with how fortunate he was to have been born in this country and
> > what
> > > > it
> > > > > > > means to be an American. He lived in Indonesia, for crying out
> > loud,
> > > > for
> > > > > > > much of his childhood; that and Hawaii. Well guess what? I lived
> > in
> > > > > > Hawaii
> > > > > > > too, and I can tell you that as a student in Hawaiian schools you
> > > > weren't
> > > > > > > exactly saturated with American culture and history. Hawaiian
> > > > history?
> > > > > > > Sure. And that's understandable. Hawaiians are very proud of
> > their
> > > > > > > heritage. But U.S. history? Only what the schools absolutely had
> > to
> > > > > > > include. And that private school, Punahou, that Obama went to in
> > > > > > Honolulu?
> > > > > > > Here's another "guess what?" My sister taught there; right
> > around the
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > that Barry was a student. Again – not a place where you're going
> > to
> > > > learn
> > > > > > > what a blessing it is to be an American and a citizen of the
> > greatest
> > > > > > > nation on earth … ever.
>
> > > > > > > Our president thinks that American greatness comes from
> > government.
> > > > He
> > > > > > > believes that free enterprise is inherently evil. He is robbing
> > us
> > > > of our
> > > > > > > economic liberty as he institutes a command economy. He believes
> > in
> > > > using
> > > > > > > tax policy for income redistribution rather than raising the
> > revenue
> > > > > > needed
> > > > > > > to pay for the basic (Constitutional) functions of government. He
> > > > said he
> > > > > > > was going to fundamentally transform the United States of
> > America,
> > > > and we
> > > > > > > stupidly didn't ask him just how he planned to do that. Now we
> > know.
> > > > And
> > > > > > > now we know that for our children to have half a chance of
> > improving
> > > > on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > standard of living that we have enjoyed – or even living as well
> > as
> > > > we
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > -- this man has to be sent back to a community organizing office
> > > > behind a
> > > > > > > dry cleaner on the South Side of Chicago … STAT.
>
> > > > > > > That brings us to Newt Gingrich and this little puddin' storm
> > over
> > > > his
> > > > > > > comments on immigration. Newt suggested that we might not want
> > to be
> > > > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though
> > illegally
> > > > –
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > > > businesses,
> > > > > > > paid taxes and helped drive our economy; and ship them back to
> > > > Mexico. As
> > > > > > > soon as those words were out of his mouth Michelle Bachmann –
> > > > desperate
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > a way to ignite voters – started screeching about "amnesty." In
> > no
> > > > time
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > had the ObamaMedia falling over itself to parrot the "amnesty"
> > line
> > > > and
> > > > > > > call Gingrich out on strikes.
>
> > > > > > > Let the progs and libs play this thing any way they want … but
> > you
> > > > > > > Replublicans; you GOPers … could you make a special effort and
> > try
> > > > to get
> > > > > > > serious here for a minute or two? Think! I've done it on
> > occasion,
> > > > and I
> > > > > > > can promise it's not painful.
>
> > > > > > > Do we need to enforce our immigration laws? Absolutely! Does the
> > > > border
> > > > > > > with Mexico need to be secured? No doubt. And Gingrich has said
> > he
> > > > would
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > just that. But a bit of realism needs to creep into this
> > > > conversation.
>
> > > > > > > I love analogies, so try this one: You come home from work to
> > find a
> > > > pipe
> > > > > > > has broken. Your home is flooded. What is the FIRST thing you
> > do? Do
> > > > you
> > > > > > > sit there and argue with people about how you're going to get all
> > > > that
> > > > > > > water out of your home? No. The FIRST thing you do is shut off
> > the
> > > > water.
> > > > > > > The same logic applies to our immigration problem. The first
> > thing
> > > > we do
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > secure our borders. Gingrich says he will shut them down.
>
> > > > > > > OK … so the flood has stopped. NOW you start to clean up the
> > mess.
>
> > > > > > > Republican voters need to mature a bit on this issue …. Not one
> > of
> > > > your
> > > > > > > candidates has actually articulated a plan deport all illegals.
> > Not
> > > > one.
> > > > > > > And do you know just why that is? Because every single GOP
> > candidate,
> > > > > > > including Bachmann, knows full well that there is no way in the
> > world
> > > > > > we're
> > > > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them
> > south.
>
> > > > > > > Try to imagine what the world will think of us (and it does
> > matter)
> > > > if we
> > > > > > > suddenly start looking for people who entered this country
> > illegally
> > > > 25
> > > > > > > years ago; people who then married an American citizen, started a
> > > > > > business,
> > > > > > > raised several children – all citizens – and who is now a vital
> > and
> > > > > > > integral part of the American economy and his community, not to
> > > > mention a
> > > > > > > husband, father and grandfather. So we find these people, and
> > start
> > > > > > > shipping them back to Mexico. Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > Oh, I
> > > > > > > know. In reality we would just be expelling law-breakers … but
> > you
> > > > try to
> > > > > > > tell that to people we want to like and admire us that when they
> > see
> > > > that
> > > > > > > most of the people on the green busses have brown skin and dark
> > hair.
>
> > > > > > > I'm particularly amused by Bachmann's (and other's) claim that
> > > > letting
> > > > > > > these people go through a process to gain legal residency status
> > in
> > > > > > America
> > > > > > > would be a "magnet" for more illegal immigration. Earth to
> > Michelle.
> > > > Our
> > > > > > > country is a magnet. Our way of life, our freedoms, our
> > > > opportunities …
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > a magnet; a magnet much more powerful than giving some long-time
> > > > illegal
> > > > > > > (but otherwise law-abiding) residents a break. What is Bachmann's
> > > > > > solution?
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Boortz: Newt On Immigration

Absolutely!   Ronald Reagan was the greatest President in the 20th Century, and you are either a Moonbat or a Crackpot if you cannot understand that.
 


 
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
a great American!
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIqRnLQ2GCY


On Nov 30, 4:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At least I don't cut and paste hatcet job articles, omitting pertinent
> facts in order to smear a great American!
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:47 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > bs
>
> > are you trying to defend these criminals?
>
> > oh, isn't that what you do ... defend criminals?
>
> > On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Some do......All of them who hold legitmate jobs, and who have fake
> > social
> > > security cards do....
>
> > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though illegally –
> > > > for
> > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > businesses,
> > > > paid taxes
> > > > ---
> > > > hold it right there .... illegals do not pay income taxes
>
> > > > Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > ---
> > > > hogwash ... it's upholding necessary immigration laws
>
> > > > there is no way in the world we're
> > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south
> > > > ---
> > > > we're doing it everyday and should continue to.
> > > > they only reason we haven't already deported millions is because of
> > > > those in our nation who protect them, namely the catholic and
> > > > protestant churches, the jews, hispanics and civil rights
> > > > organizations.
>
> > > > On Nov 29, 5:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Great Article!
>
> > > > > *Newt on Immigration*
> > > > > *Neal Boortz*
> > > > > **
> >http://townhall.com/columnists/nealboortz/2011/11/29/newt_on_immigrat.
> > > > ..
>
> > > > > OK, Republicans. Since you're so religious and all – it's time for a
> > > > little
> > > > > "come to Jesus meetin'<
> > > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=come%20to%20jesus>".
> > > > > If you're not familiar with the term, click on the link. It's time
> > for a
> > > > > little harsh dressing down.
>
> > > > > Do you realize what we have at stake in this election next year? This
> > > > isn't
> > > > > just about taxes, pork spending, social security benefits and
> > repairing
> > > > > bridges. This is about saving our Republic. Do you know we're already
> > > > past
> > > > > our life expectancy? Economies and societies built on the rule of
> > law,
> > > > > liberty and economic freedom have this troubling tendency to destroy
> > > > > themselves at around the 200 year mark. This happens when people
> > figure
> > > > out
> > > > > they can use the ballot box to get their hands on someone else's
> > stuff.
>
> > > > > Well guess what, folks? We're there. We're past there. We're on the
> > > > ropes.
> > > > > We're old – and durned near on our deathbed.
>
> > > > > We have a president who was not raised as an American. Oh, I know.
> > He's a
> > > > > citizen and all that … but he was not infused during his formative
> > years
> > > > > with how fortunate he was to have been born in this country and what
> > it
> > > > > means to be an American. He lived in Indonesia, for crying out loud,
> > for
> > > > > much of his childhood; that and Hawaii. Well guess what? I lived in
> > > > Hawaii
> > > > > too, and I can tell you that as a student in Hawaiian schools you
> > weren't
> > > > > exactly saturated with American culture and history. Hawaiian
> > history?
> > > > > Sure. And that's understandable. Hawaiians are very proud of their
> > > > > heritage. But U.S. history? Only what the schools absolutely had to
> > > > > include. And that private school, Punahou, that Obama went to in
> > > > Honolulu?
> > > > > Here's another "guess what?" My sister taught there; right around the
> > > > time
> > > > > that Barry was a student. Again – not a place where you're going to
> > learn
> > > > > what a blessing it is to be an American and a citizen of the greatest
> > > > > nation on earth … ever.
>
> > > > > Our president thinks that American greatness comes from government.
> > He
> > > > > believes that free enterprise is inherently evil. He is robbing us
> > of our
> > > > > economic liberty as he institutes a command economy. He believes in
> > using
> > > > > tax policy for income redistribution rather than raising the revenue
> > > > needed
> > > > > to pay for the basic (Constitutional) functions of government. He
> > said he
> > > > > was going to fundamentally transform the United States of America,
> > and we
> > > > > stupidly didn't ask him just how he planned to do that. Now we know.
> > And
> > > > > now we know that for our children to have half a chance of improving
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > standard of living that we have enjoyed – or even living as well as
> > we
> > > > have
> > > > > -- this man has to be sent back to a community organizing office
> > behind a
> > > > > dry cleaner on the South Side of Chicago … STAT.
>
> > > > > That brings us to Newt Gingrich and this little puddin' storm over
> > his
> > > > > comments on immigration. Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though illegally
> > –
> > > > for
> > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > businesses,
> > > > > paid taxes and helped drive our economy; and ship them back to
> > Mexico. As
> > > > > soon as those words were out of his mouth Michelle Bachmann –
> > desperate
> > > > for
> > > > > a way to ignite voters – started screeching about "amnesty." In no
> > time
> > > > we
> > > > > had the ObamaMedia falling over itself to parrot the "amnesty" line
> > and
> > > > > call Gingrich out on strikes.
>
> > > > > Let the progs and libs play this thing any way they want … but you
> > > > > Replublicans; you GOPers … could you make a special effort and try
> > to get
> > > > > serious here for a minute or two? Think! I've done it on occasion,
> > and I
> > > > > can promise it's not painful.
>
> > > > > Do we need to enforce our immigration laws? Absolutely! Does the
> > border
> > > > > with Mexico need to be secured? No doubt. And Gingrich has said he
> > would
> > > > do
> > > > > just that. But a bit of realism needs to creep into this
> > conversation.
>
> > > > > I love analogies, so try this one: You come home from work to find a
> > pipe
> > > > > has broken. Your home is flooded. What is the FIRST thing you do? Do
> > you
> > > > > sit there and argue with people about how you're going to get all
> > that
> > > > > water out of your home? No. The FIRST thing you do is shut off the
> > water.
> > > > > The same logic applies to our immigration problem. The first thing
> > we do
> > > > is
> > > > > secure our borders. Gingrich says he will shut them down.
>
> > > > > OK … so the flood has stopped. NOW you start to clean up the mess.
>
> > > > > Republican voters need to mature a bit on this issue …. Not one of
> > your
> > > > > candidates has actually articulated a plan deport all illegals. Not
> > one.
> > > > > And do you know just why that is? Because every single GOP candidate,
> > > > > including Bachmann, knows full well that there is no way in the world
> > > > we're
> > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south.
>
> > > > > Try to imagine what the world will think of us (and it does matter)
> > if we
> > > > > suddenly start looking for people who entered this country illegally
> > 25
> > > > > years ago; people who then married an American citizen, started a
> > > > business,
> > > > > raised several children – all citizens – and who is now a vital and
> > > > > integral part of the American economy and his community, not to
> > mention a
> > > > > husband, father and grandfather. So we find these people, and start
> > > > > shipping them back to Mexico. Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > Oh, I
> > > > > know. In reality we would just be expelling law-breakers … but you
> > try to
> > > > > tell that to people we want to like and admire us that when they see
> > that
> > > > > most of the people on the green busses have brown skin and dark hair.
>
> > > > > I'm particularly amused by Bachmann's (and other's) claim that
> > letting
> > > > > these people go through a process to gain legal residency status in
> > > > America
> > > > > would be a "magnet" for more illegal immigration. Earth to Michelle.
> > Our
> > > > > country is a magnet. Our way of life, our freedoms, our
> > opportunities …
> > > > all
> > > > > a magnet; a magnet much more powerful than giving some long-time
> > illegal
> > > > > (but otherwise law-abiding) residents a break. What is Bachmann's
> > > > solution?
> > > > > Are we going to combat illegal immigration by making the United
> > States a
> > > > > country to which nobody wants to emigrate? Seal the borders! Take the
> > > > same
> > > > > actions to protect our borders that Mexico takes to protect theirs!
>
> > > > > There's a lot of anger on this issue. Understandable anger. We've
> > had a
> > > > > succession of politicians and leaders who have steadfastly refused
> > to do
> > > > > anything about what I call the Mexican invasion. And when a state
> > (like
> > > > > Arizona) does try to address the situation, our federal government
> > sides
> > > > > with the Mexican officials to go to court to get the enforcement
> > actions
> > > > > stopped!
>
> > > > > If it were not for the 17th Amendment to our Constitution, this story
> > > > would
> > > > > read completely different .. but that's another column.
>
> > > > > So, Republicans --- instead of insisting that your candidate seek
> > revenge
> > > > > on people who sought freedom and opportunity many, many years ago;
> > try
> > > > > demanding that your candidate promise to do something to stem the
> > tide as
> > > > > soon as he's sworn in. Shut off the water. Close the borders. Once
> > that's
> > > > > been done we'll seek out the illegals that pose a threat to our
> > society
> > > > and
> > > > > greet them with a clenched fist. Those
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** "BEHTAR"

Zindagi Tab "BEHTAR" Hoti Hay, Jab Aap KHUSH Hote Hain

Lekin,

Zindagi Tab "BEHTAREEN" Hoti Hay Jab Apki Wajah Se koi dosra KHUSH Hota Hay.


*** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink ***

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Obama did more for Israel's security than previous administrations

Obama to N.Y. Jews: No ally is more important than Israel
Speaking at N.Y. meeting of campaign donors, U.S. president says did
more for Israel's security than previous administrations.
By Reuters Tags: Barack Obama US Jews

President Barack Obama defended his policy toward Israel at a
political fundraiser on Wednesday, saying that Israel was the U.S.'s
most important ally.

Obama, who has been criticized by some of Israel's U.S. supporters for
being tough on a close ally and has had strained ties with Israeli
Prime Benjamin Netanyahu, offered strong assurances of his commitment
to Israel's security.

"I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration
has done more for the security of the state of Israel than any
previous administration," Obama said. "We don't compromise when it
comes to Israel's security ... and that will continue."

The president was speaking to campaign donors at the Manhattan home of
Jack Rosen, chairman of the American Jewish Congress, who said "it
would be remiss for me not to say there are many in the Jewish
community who are concerned" about the relationship between Israel and
the United States.

Rosen added, however, that "America has never been as supportive of
the state of Israel as President Obama and his administration."

The White House wants to shore up support among Jewish voters for
Obama's 2012 re-election bid. He won nearly eight of every 10 Jewish
voters in 2008, but a slip would jeopardize his re-election drive in
battleground states like Florida and Pennsylvania, where they are an
important swing bloc.

Obama faced criticism from some Jewish leaders earlier this year when
he insisted that any negotiations on the borders of a future
Palestinian state begin on the basis of lines that existed before
Israel captured the West Bank and Gaza Strip in a 1967 war. His Middle
East peace efforts have mostly stalled.

But Obama won praise from Israel and its backers for his opposition to
a Palestinian push beginning in September to win U.N. statehood
recognition, and he has also been credited for taking a tough line
with Iran, Israel's arch-enemy.

"No ally is more important than the state of Israel," Obama said at
the fundraiser, which collected at least $300,000 from wealthy donors
for his re-election bid and other Democratic campaigns.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

War on drugs revealed as total hoax


Wednesday, November 16, 2011
War on drugs revealed as total hoax
US military admits to guarding, assisting lucrative opium trade in Afghanistan
by: Ethan A. Huff

Afghanistan is, by far, the largest grower and exporter of opium in the world today, cultivating a 92 percent market share of the global opium trade. But what may shock many is the fact that the US military has been specifically tasked with guarding Afghan poppy fields, from which opium is derived, in order to protect this multibillion dollar industry that enriches Wall Street, the CIA, MI6, and various other groups that profit big time from this illicit drug trade scheme.

Prior to the tragic events of September 11, 2001, Afghanistan was hardly even a world player in growing poppy, which is used to produce both illegal heroin and pharmaceutical-grade morphine. In fact, the Taliban had been actively destroying poppy fields as part of an effort to rid the country of this harmful plant, as was reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on February 16, 2001, in a piece entitled Nation's opium production virtually wiped out ( http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...).

But after 9/11, the US military-industrial complex quickly invaded Afghanistan and began facilitating the reinstatement of the country's poppy industry. According to the United Nations Drug Control Program (UNDCP), opium cultivation increased by 657 percent in 2002 after the US military invaded the country under the direction of then-President George W. Bush ( http://www.infowars.com/fox-news-ma...).

CIA responsible for reinstating opium industry in Afghanistan after 9/11

More recently, The New York Times (NYT) reported that the brother of current Afghan President Hamid Karzai had actually been on the payroll of the CIA for at least eight years prior to this information going public in 2009. Ahmed Wali Karzai was a crucial player in reinstating the country's opium drug trade, known as Golden Crescent, and the CIA had been financing the endeavor behind the scenes ( http://www.infowars.com/ny-times-af...).

"The Golden Crescent drug trade, launched by the CIA in the early 1980s, continues to be protected by US intelligence, in liaison with NATO occupation forces and the British military," wrote Prof. Michel Chossudovsky in a 2007 report, before it was revealed that Ahmed Wali Karzai was on the CIA payroll. "The proceeds of this lucrative multibillion dollar contraband are deposited in Western banks. Almost the totality of revenues accrue to corporate interests and criminal syndicates outside Afghanistan" ( http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/A...).

But the mainstream media has been peddling a different story to the American public. FOX News, for instance, aired a propaganda piece back in 2010 claiming that military personnel are having to protect the Afghan poppy fields, rather than destroy them, in order to keep the locals happy and to avoid a potential "security risk" -- and FOX News reporter Geraldo Rivera can be heard blatantly lying about poppy farmers being financially supported by the Taliban, rather than the CIA and other foreign interests.

You can watch that clip here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj-b3pB6M7s

So while tens of thousands of Americans continue to be harmed or killed every year by overdoses from drugs originating from this illicit opium trade, and while cultivation of innocuous crops like marijuana and hemp remains illegal in the US, the American military is actively guarding the very poppy fields in Afghanistan that fuel the global drug trade. Something is terribly wrong with this picture.

http://bit.ly/s6vCzl

Re: Boortz: Newt On Immigration

a great American!
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIqRnLQ2GCY


On Nov 30, 4:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At least I don't cut and paste hatcet job articles, omitting pertinent
> facts in order to smear a great American!
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:47 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > bs
>
> > are you trying to defend these criminals?
>
> > oh, isn't that what you do ... defend criminals?
>
> > On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Some do......All of them who hold legitmate jobs, and who have fake
> > social
> > > security cards do....
>
> > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though illegally –
> > > > for
> > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > businesses,
> > > > paid taxes
> > > > ---
> > > > hold it right there .... illegals do not pay income taxes
>
> > > > Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > > > ---
> > > > hogwash ... it's upholding necessary immigration laws
>
> > > > there is no way in the world we're
> > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south
> > > > ---
> > > > we're doing it everyday and should continue to.
> > > > they only reason we haven't already deported millions is because of
> > > > those in our nation who protect them, namely the catholic and
> > > > protestant churches, the jews, hispanics and civil rights
> > > > organizations.
>
> > > > On Nov 29, 5:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Great Article!
>
> > > > > *Newt on Immigration*
> > > > > *Neal Boortz*
> > > > > **
> >http://townhall.com/columnists/nealboortz/2011/11/29/newt_on_immigrat.
> > > > ..
>
> > > > > OK, Republicans. Since you're so religious and all – it's time for a
> > > > little
> > > > > "come to Jesus meetin'<
> > > >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=come%20to%20jesus>".
> > > > > If you're not familiar with the term, click on the link. It's time
> > for a
> > > > > little harsh dressing down.
>
> > > > > Do you realize what we have at stake in this election next year? This
> > > > isn't
> > > > > just about taxes, pork spending, social security benefits and
> > repairing
> > > > > bridges. This is about saving our Republic. Do you know we're already
> > > > past
> > > > > our life expectancy? Economies and societies built on the rule of
> > law,
> > > > > liberty and economic freedom have this troubling tendency to destroy
> > > > > themselves at around the 200 year mark. This happens when people
> > figure
> > > > out
> > > > > they can use the ballot box to get their hands on someone else's
> > stuff.
>
> > > > > Well guess what, folks? We're there. We're past there. We're on the
> > > > ropes.
> > > > > We're old – and durned near on our deathbed.
>
> > > > > We have a president who was not raised as an American. Oh, I know.
> > He's a
> > > > > citizen and all that … but he was not infused during his formative
> > years
> > > > > with how fortunate he was to have been born in this country and what
> > it
> > > > > means to be an American. He lived in Indonesia, for crying out loud,
> > for
> > > > > much of his childhood; that and Hawaii. Well guess what? I lived in
> > > > Hawaii
> > > > > too, and I can tell you that as a student in Hawaiian schools you
> > weren't
> > > > > exactly saturated with American culture and history. Hawaiian
> > history?
> > > > > Sure. And that's understandable. Hawaiians are very proud of their
> > > > > heritage. But U.S. history? Only what the schools absolutely had to
> > > > > include. And that private school, Punahou, that Obama went to in
> > > > Honolulu?
> > > > > Here's another "guess what?" My sister taught there; right around the
> > > > time
> > > > > that Barry was a student. Again – not a place where you're going to
> > learn
> > > > > what a blessing it is to be an American and a citizen of the greatest
> > > > > nation on earth … ever.
>
> > > > > Our president thinks that American greatness comes from government.
> > He
> > > > > believes that free enterprise is inherently evil. He is robbing us
> > of our
> > > > > economic liberty as he institutes a command economy. He believes in
> > using
> > > > > tax policy for income redistribution rather than raising the revenue
> > > > needed
> > > > > to pay for the basic (Constitutional) functions of government. He
> > said he
> > > > > was going to fundamentally transform the United States of America,
> > and we
> > > > > stupidly didn't ask him just how he planned to do that. Now we know.
> > And
> > > > > now we know that for our children to have half a chance of improving
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > standard of living that we have enjoyed – or even living as well as
> > we
> > > > have
> > > > > -- this man has to be sent back to a community organizing office
> > behind a
> > > > > dry cleaner on the South Side of Chicago … STAT.
>
> > > > > That brings us to Newt Gingrich and this little puddin' storm over
> > his
> > > > > comments on immigration. Newt suggested that we might not want to be
> > > > > rounding up people who have lived in this country – though illegally
> > –
> > > > for
> > > > > 25 years or so; during which time they raised families, started
> > > > businesses,
> > > > > paid taxes and helped drive our economy; and ship them back to
> > Mexico. As
> > > > > soon as those words were out of his mouth Michelle Bachmann –
> > desperate
> > > > for
> > > > > a way to ignite voters – started screeching about "amnesty." In no
> > time
> > > > we
> > > > > had the ObamaMedia falling over itself to parrot the "amnesty" line
> > and
> > > > > call Gingrich out on strikes.
>
> > > > > Let the progs and libs play this thing any way they want … but you
> > > > > Replublicans; you GOPers … could you make a special effort and try
> > to get
> > > > > serious here for a minute or two? Think! I've done it on occasion,
> > and I
> > > > > can promise it's not painful.
>
> > > > > Do we need to enforce our immigration laws? Absolutely! Does the
> > border
> > > > > with Mexico need to be secured? No doubt. And Gingrich has said he
> > would
> > > > do
> > > > > just that. But a bit of realism needs to creep into this
> > conversation.
>
> > > > > I love analogies, so try this one: You come home from work to find a
> > pipe
> > > > > has broken. Your home is flooded. What is the FIRST thing you do? Do
> > you
> > > > > sit there and argue with people about how you're going to get all
> > that
> > > > > water out of your home? No. The FIRST thing you do is shut off the
> > water.
> > > > > The same logic applies to our immigration problem. The first thing
> > we do
> > > > is
> > > > > secure our borders. Gingrich says he will shut them down.
>
> > > > > OK … so the flood has stopped. NOW you start to clean up the mess.
>
> > > > > Republican voters need to mature a bit on this issue …. Not one of
> > your
> > > > > candidates has actually articulated a plan deport all illegals. Not
> > one.
> > > > > And do you know just why that is? Because every single GOP candidate,
> > > > > including Bachmann, knows full well that there is no way in the world
> > > > we're
> > > > > going to round up every illegal in this country and send them south.
>
> > > > > Try to imagine what the world will think of us (and it does matter)
> > if we
> > > > > suddenly start looking for people who entered this country illegally
> > 25
> > > > > years ago; people who then married an American citizen, started a
> > > > business,
> > > > > raised several children – all citizens – and who is now a vital and
> > > > > integral part of the American economy and his community, not to
> > mention a
> > > > > husband, father and grandfather. So we find these people, and start
> > > > > shipping them back to Mexico. Can you hear the screams from the
> > > > > international community? Try these two words: "Ethnic cleansing."
> > Oh, I
> > > > > know. In reality we would just be expelling law-breakers … but you
> > try to
> > > > > tell that to people we want to like and admire us that when they see
> > that
> > > > > most of the people on the green busses have brown skin and dark hair.
>
> > > > > I'm particularly amused by Bachmann's (and other's) claim that
> > letting
> > > > > these people go through a process to gain legal residency status in
> > > > America
> > > > > would be a "magnet" for more illegal immigration. Earth to Michelle.
> > Our
> > > > > country is a magnet. Our way of life, our freedoms, our
> > opportunities …
> > > > all
> > > > > a magnet; a magnet much more powerful than giving some long-time
> > illegal
> > > > > (but otherwise law-abiding) residents a break. What is Bachmann's
> > > > solution?
> > > > > Are we going to combat illegal immigration by making the United
> > States a
> > > > > country to which nobody wants to emigrate? Seal the borders! Take the
> > > > same
> > > > > actions to protect our borders that Mexico takes to protect theirs!
>
> > > > > There's a lot of anger on this issue. Understandable anger. We've
> > had a
> > > > > succession of politicians and leaders who have steadfastly refused
> > to do
> > > > > anything about what I call the Mexican invasion. And when a state
> > (like
> > > > > Arizona) does try to address the situation, our federal government
> > sides
> > > > > with the Mexican officials to go to court to get the enforcement
> > actions
> > > > > stopped!
>
> > > > > If it were not for the 17th Amendment to our Constitution, this story
> > > > would
> > > > > read completely different .. but that's another column.
>
> > > > > So, Republicans --- instead of insisting that your candidate seek
> > revenge
> > > > > on people who sought freedom and opportunity many, many years ago;
> > try
> > > > > demanding that your candidate promise to do something to stem the
> > tide as
> > > > > soon as he's sworn in. Shut off the water. Close the borders. Once
> > that's
> > > > > been done we'll seek out the illegals that pose a threat to our
> > society
> > > > and
> > > > > greet them with a clenched fist. Those
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Newt’s Neocon Army

warmonger

On Nov 30, 4:14 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Here's a taste of World Team Gingrich:
> > ----
> > yes, all are warmongering neocons who should be removed from our
> > government forever
>
> > they call all go home to israel and join Larry Franklin, Richard
> > Pearle, Douglas Feith, and Paul Wolfowitz as hero spies who used the
> > USA like a two bit whore
>
> > On Nov 29, 6:23 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > TPM2012Newt's Neocon ArmyBenjy Sarlin & Evan McMorris-Santoro November
> > 29, 2011, 6:00 AM 5288 54
> > > When it comes to foreign policy, the Republican frontrunner likes it
> > old-school. Neo-old school.
> > > We've had two foreign policy themed debates in the GOP primary now,
> > which have provided ample opportunity to see what a Republican foreign
> > policy would look like in 2013. And in the case of Newt Gingrich, it would
> > probably look like a kind of neocon fantasy land.Foreign Policypublished
> > anexcellent rundownof Gingrich's foreign policy advising team, most of whom
> > "have known Newt for decades, and see themselves as helping a candidate who
> > already boasts a long track record and well-formed intellectual identity
> > when it comes to foreign policy."
> > > Here's a taste of World Team Gingrich:David Wurmser: Gingrich's Middle
> > East policy adviser was a notorious member of Vice President Cheney's inner
> > circle that pushed the U.S. into war in Iraq. Once he wasquestioned during
> > an espionage probewhile in the vice president's office, and he was one of
> > the names driving the initial support for the later disgraced Ahmed
> > Chalabi. Asked bytheDaily Telegraphin 2007if he was a neocon, he offered
> > this: "There's nothing 'neo' about me. I'm a very medieval sort of
> > guy."James Woosley: A former director of the CIA, Woolsey recently spoke at
> > a panel hosted by the founder of Judicial Watch focused on President
> > Obama's "political jihadpromoting Islam around the world." Woolsey is a
> > serious Iran hawk, warning that the way the West is dealing with the nation
> > at the moment "rhymes with what was taking place in the 1930s [with Nazi
> > Germany]". Woolsey is a Democrat (of the Lieberman school) but he's helped
> > Republicans running for president before. In 2008, headvisedJohn
> > McCain.Stephen Yates: Another ex-Cheney national security team member,
> > Yates is known among other things for his work on China. Oneformer U.S.
> > ambassadorto China familiar with Yates says he views "China as the solution
> > to 'enemy deprivation syndrome.'" AsCounterpunchexplained the theory, "You
> > need some unifying enemy after the collapse of the Soviet Union." Not
> > exactly the most productive way to view one of America's most important
> > trading partner, perhaps.
> > > It's not just Gingrich who's dipping in the neocon well to form a
> > national security strategy. Rick Perry, who was once the frontrunner before
> > descending out of view like so many before him, leaned on former Donald
> > Rumsfeld deputyDoug Feith, best known for pushing the Al queda-Iraq
> > connection in the run up to the Iraq War and being called by former Gen.
> > Tommy Franks "thef***ing stupidest guyon the face of the earth."
> > > But no one can top Michele Bachmann when it comes to extremist foreign
> > policy advisers. No less than Islamic fearmonger-in-chiefFrank Gaffney
> > himselfhas been a foreign policy adviser to her campaign.
> > > Foreign policy is a favorite topic inside the beltway, though with the
> > down economy (and a Democratic president in office who never met a
> > missile-laden drone he didn't like) it's not clear how much of a role
> > arguments over international affairs will have on the presidential
> > campaign. Republicans certainly like to ding President Obama over Israel
> > and Iran, but it's hard to predict how important those fights will be down
> > the line. Still, the willingness of Republicans to embrace the Bush foreign
> > policy team which in the end were among the least popular of his
> > administration is maybe telling.
> >http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/newt-gingrichs-neocon-army....
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
>  Moonbat2..jpg
> 30KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.