900 bases in over 130 countries... just what description do you place
on that. (those numbers do NOT count embassy and consular staffs and
protective details)
On Nov 20, 3:41 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Bruce,
>
> Dr. Paul said it, during one of the debates, (I think the third debate)
>
> I don't necessarily agree with most of what Mark just wrote, although I
> think it simplifies the status of the United States' Middle Eastern Foreign
> Policy. I reject the notion that the United States is some type of an
> interventionist war mongering Nation. That's simply not true.
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I doubt he said that
>
> > On Sunday, November 20, 2011, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > That's funny. I could have sworn some raghead Jihadists destroyed a
> > > marine> barracks, two US Embassies in Africa, and almost sunk a
> > > warship in the> 1990′s and ended up killing 3,000 Americans on our own
> > > soil in a few> minute's time one fine September morning.
>
> > > Lets see..... the present course of action has seen the USA help in
> > > the FOUNDING of at least two firmly entrenched radical Islam/anti-
> > > America governments, third out of four has point blank said that if
> > > there was a choice between helping an Islamic country or the USA they
> > > would help the Islamic state. The fourth, the one the USA has NO
> > > interest in, now or ever, is the only one that will come out of recent
> > > conflict as moderate and progressive.
>
> > > Given the constant state of "alerts" in the USA the wars have done
> > > NOTHING to make you more secure... other than to be secure in the loss
> > > of basic rights.
>
> > > Just exactly what is wrong with the "rule of law"? Just what do you
> > > have against the constitution that is forcing you into the the "war
> > > powers" and "(un)patriot act" corner?
>
> > > The standing army is not a good idea... A well armed ...in every way..
> > > defense force is. Had the Air Force done its duty on 9-11 no planes
> > > would have hit the towers... had the ships watch done its duty the
> > > Cole would not have been harmed... etc. etc. etc. NONE of the
> > > protocol was followed in any of these cases.. this resulted in the
> > > successful attacks.
>
> > > I have "0" problem with not allowing a plane, ship, or automobile that
> > > carries a Muslim to enter US space. Just quit playing politics with
> > > the world, bomb Irans nuke plant, cut off aid to Muslim countries etc.
> > > But don't play with boots on the ground.. it has not worked in over 50
> > > years.
>
> > > On Nov 20, 9:26 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Ron Paul said today that he could see no possible reason to ever launch
> > >> military action or initiate a war.
>
> > >> I'm convinced now, that Ron Paul has become a complete buffoonish
> > nitwit,
> > >> either hopelessly naive, or plain stupid. I'd like to hope it's the
> > former,
> > >> but as the days wear on and I listen to his insane anti-war rantings,
> > I'm
> > >> not so sure anymore.
>
> > >> How can anyone even consider this 'Feel-The-Love' Libertarian for the
> > helm
> > >> of Commander-In-Chief?
>
> > >> Jihadists all over the world are vowing our destuction. Ahmadinejad of
> > Iran
> > >> is vowing to wipe out "The Great Satan" and usher in the Islamic
> > Messiah.
> > >> Nukes are being sought by Al Qaeda and being developed by Jihad states.
> > >> Plans for mass death and mayhem in American neighborhoods and schools
> > have
> > >> been recovered from Jihad base camps.
>
> > >> Ron Paul says he sees no possible reason to EVER launch military action
> > or
> > >> go to war.
>
> > >> The guy is on some serious LSD, or he has a hippie Love Fest hangover
> > with
> > >> his pals at moveon.org and other Left-wing Anti-war groups of mostly
> > 60′s
> > >> anti-war retreads.
>
> > >> No possible reason to EVER launch military action???
> > >> Hey Paulie Girl! Remember this???
>
> > >> *(Picture of the WTC)*
>
> > >> Or do you think some 17th Century letter of Marque and Reprisal would
> > >> better deal with the global beast that is militant Islam? But then, if
> > >> Jihad homicide bombers kill themselves by killing Americans then the
> > idea
> > >> of letters of marque are a bit stupid are they not?? The perps are
> > already
> > >> DEAD.
>
> > >> Of course some Libertarians not smoking a bong would think that Letters
> > of
> > >> Marque and Reprisal is a workable option – except they be hypocrites
> > >> considering they are the loudest voices of opposition to Blackwater USA,
> > >> which is essentially the posse a Letter of Reprisal would merit.
>
> > >> Yes, methinks Ron Paul has had too many tokes from the doobie or a major
> > >> contact high from his hippie fans piled in the Ron Paul '08 VW Van
> > >> considering his foray into an alternate reality where giving peace a
> > chance
> > >> defeats Jihadists hell bent on world domination.
>
> > >> But let's take a look at Ron Paul's latest Blame America Pacifistic
> > >> sonata<
> >http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR200...>
> > >> .
>
> > >> In an interview with Washingtonpost.com's PostTalk program, the Texas
> > >> congressman said he could see "no reason" to justify military action if
> > he
> > >> were elected president. He compared the United States to a schoolyard
> > bully
> > >> and said the country has no reason to flex its muscles overseas.
>
> > >> 3,000 dead Americans whose blood cries out to us disagree with you Mr.
> > >> Paul. Of course you are of the Osama Bin Laden opinion that America
> > >> deserved 9-11, due our presence in the Middle East and the world.
>
> > >> "There's nobody in this world that could possibly attack us today," he
> > said
> > >> in the interview.
>
> > >> That's funny. I could have sworn some raghead Jihadists destroyed a
> > marine
> > >> barracks, two US Embassies in Africa, and almost sunk a warship in the
> > >> 1990′s and ended up killing 3,000 Americans on our own soil in a few
> > >> minute's time one fine September morning.
>
> > >> "I mean, we could defend this country with a few good submarines. If
> > >> anybody dared touch us we could wipe any country off of the face of the
> > >> earth within hours.
>
> > >> Oh really? And what nation should we have wiped off the earth after
> > 9-11?
> > >> Afghanistan? Saudi Arabia? Yemen? Egypt? All four?
>
> > >> You bother to READ Islamic prophecy and what both Bin laden and
> > Ahmadinejad
> > >> WANT Mr. Paul?
>
> > >> Of course not.
>
> > >> Otherwise you would not be an appeasement stooge for them, playing into
> > >> their foremost desires to martyr entire Muslim nations before the final
> > >> great battle they promise will destroy the West.
>
> > >> And here we are, so intimidated and so insecure and we're acting like
> > such
> > >> bullies that we have to attack third-world nations that have no military
> > >> and have no weapon."
>
> > >> It was amazing what their trained warrior Jihadists were able to
> > accomplish
> > >> with just a few boxcutters and some training on U.S. soil thanks to our
> > >> Immigration policies.
>
> > >> 3,000 American dead. Billions in destruction.
>
> > >> Wonder what the same kind of barbarians would be able to accomplish WITH
> > >> substantive weapons and the willpower to use them to kill us all Mr.
> > Paul?
>
> > >> Nah, your feeble mind refused to grasp reality and the concept the 9-11
> > >> reality woke us up to.
>
> > >> Ron Paul, you are become a disgrace. An embarrassment. Just like the
> > >> hippies of old – you are high and you stink.
>
> > >> If we keep listening to this foreign policy idiot, we're going to need
> > some
> > >> heavy ludes to calm us down, but Ron Paul is already there on the mellow
> > >> yellow submarine of psychedelic pacifism. Pass the 'shrooms and get
> > ready
> > >> to go far out man, all the way back to the 1700′s when men wore wigs and
> > >> the biggest weapon was a ten pound cannonball. Yup, those days of Marque
> > >> and Reprisal are sure to put a stop to Al Qaeda today. Of course there's
> > >> this little problem with the fact Congress passed a law forbidding the
> > >> assassination of any foreign leaders or rogues – but hey – whose
> > counting
> > >> facts? Let's wrap ourselves in the parchment of the Constitution and
> > >> pretend the real world melts in it's presence.
>
> > >> Kindof how our faces seem to melt with the heavy drugs Ron Paul must be
> > >> freebasing.
>
> > >> Someone wake up Ronnie there – before some Jihadist hands him a hooka
> > next
> > >> and he smokes some more appeasement propaganda.
>
> > >>http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/ron-paul-is-hopelessl.
> > ..
>
> > >> 9-11.jpg
> > >> 112KViewDownload
>
> > >> Paul2012..jpg
> > >> 185KViewDownload
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment