Re: The Supreme Court and Obamacare

Yea, you can do just about anything and hide it behind General
Welfare. Rather than the article, I should have just cited the
clause, as Bela Pelosi did.

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several
States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Does regulate now mean force?

On Oct 12, 9:51 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> an argument could be made that it provides for the general Welfare of
> the people of the United States.
>
> imo, the government shouldn't be in the healthcare business as it's
> overwhelmed with bureaucracy and too wasteful
> there's also the issue of providing healthcare to those who don't pay
> into the system ... bleeding heart politicians can't say no
>
> On Oct 12, 8:27 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ok, any ideas on how Article 1, section 8 gives the government the
> > power to force particiption in interstate commerce?
>
> > Keep in mind, Obama has said over and over again, the penalty is not a
> > tax.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.