Monday, October 10, 2011

Employers not hiring the unemployed - here's what to do about it

The latest scam is a Bill to Congress by Obama that would supposedly
stop discrimination by employers not hiring anyone out of work.

#1. It would never pass in a Republican held Congress.
#2. Employers are never going to state that's the reason they won't
hire you.
#3. They won't catch anyone, and is another wasteful spending measure.

It's all politically motivated with no basis in logic.
i.e. I've been out of work for 6 years now; I applied for a job that
wanted 5 months experience and wrote them I had 35 times that
experience and (knowing they wouldn't hire me) would consider dumbing
myself down for the position.

So what unemployed people need to do (and feel free to pass this on),
is create their own "current" work history.

i.e. I made my g/f (wife, mother, sister, friend, who ever can help
you with this) assistant human resource manager for a known small
legitimate company. Chances are the potential employer will have no
idea who the Human Resources Manger is there.
If any employers want to call her (some may, some won't), she will
verify I am indeed gainfully employed by her company with no issues.

In this time of political lies and deception by both major political
parties, you have to do what they do; fabricate and lie.

Obama knew *exactly* what the unemployment situation was when he came
into office.
But what did he do?
Instead of address the problem from the start, he gave Health Care
plan the priority (a plan that doesn't kick in for another 3 years
anyway!), because when people are employed, they don't need his health
care plan.
So he waited, and waited, and waited to address employment... now
making it a campaign issue, and not an actual job creating plan.
All the while neither major political parties had zero plans to
stimulate the real economy and create jobs.

Why do you think Bush Jr. came up with a $700 billion bailout for Wall
Street? And Obama continued the bailouts with half the money Bush Jr.
didn't spend on them?
Because both major political parties love the huge amounts of money
that gets kicked back to them in the form of political campaign
donations.
Wall Street simply asks the politicians; which political party will
give me the best deal for my donations?

And you wonder why your bank fees go up?
Don't be so ignorant.

Wall Street kick-back donations far out-weigh donations given to them
by all grass-roots ordinary people.
Combine that with unions, big oil, telecoms, law firms, and other big
business interests... and the common people have zero chance of having
any of their real concerns addressed.

By the people, for the people?
If by "people" you mean "big business", then yes.
Otherwise it's just meaningless words on a very old wrinkly piece of
paper.
Remember; the Supreme Court validated that money donated by big
business is speech.
That simply means anything you have to say about anything is
worthless.

And all of this because "the people" can't hold the leaders
accountable for what a average 3rd grader is expected to accomplish in
math class.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment